Legislature(2003 - 2004)
05/04/2004 09:07 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 533(JUD)
"An Act relating to the state's administrative procedures and
to judicial oversight of administrative matters."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Wilken stated that this bill, which is sponsored by the
House State Affairs Committee, would allow a person who is unable
to acquire a final administrative decision from a State agency to
request assistance from the State Superior Court. He noted that
Version 23-LS1833\I is before the Committee for consideration.
REPRESENTATIVE BRUCE WEYHRAUCH, Chair, House State Affairs
Committee which sponsors this bill, explained that the intent of
this bill is to provide a person the ability to "dynamite a case"
being reviewed by an administrative agency from that agency and
place it with the Superior Court in order to obtain "a more
expeditious decision."
Senator Olson asked how frequently these situations occur.
Representative Weyhrauch clarified that the Superior Court
jurisdictional review process is currently unavailable. He
explained that, even were this legislation adopted, the proposed
process would not be implemented without a "showing of unreasonable
delay," and, in addition, the administrative agency would be
provided an opportunity to provide a rational reason as to why a
decision had not be made. He also pointed out that in some
instances, a delay in a determination might benefit an individual
as exampled by a situation in which, during the review process, the
Department of Fish and Game might issue an interim fishing permit
to a person who might have some issues that might negatively affect
their application. On the other hand, he stated, were a
determination regarding an appeal of a person's business license
delayed, the person's livelihood could be jeopardized. This
legislation, he attested, would enable a person to request that the
agency "move quickly provide" to expedite the decision.
Co-Chair Green moved to adopt Version "I" as the working document.
There being no objection, Version "I" was adopted as the working
document.
Senator Bunde asked regarding Fiscal Note #4 from the Department of
Law.
Representative Weyhrauch responded that this fiscal note would
address attorney expenses incurred to the Department when it
represents an agency in litigation based on unreasonable agency
delay.
Senator Bunde observed that this is "when we sue ourselves again."
DAVE STANCLIFF, Staff, Administrative Regulatory Review Committee
and Staff to Senate President Gene Therriault, informed the
Committee that, since 1980, in excess of 8,500 administrative
agency determinations took longer than one year to be completed.
Continuing, he noted that "what is not reflected" in the fiscal
notes are the savings resulting from "less State time and less
State dollars" that would result were decisions made more
expediently. He stated that quicker determinations would also
positively impact the private sector.
Senator Bunde concurred. However, he noted that while this bill
would encourage more agency efficiency, that efficiency requirement
could provide the opportunity for State agencies to be sued.
DOUG WOOLIVER, Administrative Attorney, Office of the
Administrative Director, Alaska Court System, noted that, even
though many people might believe that their delay is unreasonable,
the Court System does not believe it would be "flooded" with cases
as, he opined, the possibility that a case might be moved to the
Superior Court would serve to motivate agency determinations to be
conducted within a reasonable amount of time. He noted that this
process could also be enhanced as a result of measures included in
other legislation that is being introduced. However, he stated that
were thousands of yearlong determination delays to occur, the
Department would require additional funding.
Representative Weyhrauch informed the Committee that, at one point,
language had been made entertained that would have served to
withhold payment to Superior Court justices were a ruling not
forthcoming within six months after referral. He noted that this
language, while not adopted, could also have applied to agency
hearing officers.
Co-Chair Green moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, SCS CS HB 533(FIN) was REPORTED from
Committee with indeterminate fiscal note #1, dated March 18, 2004
from the Alaska Court System; indeterminate fiscal note #2, dated
March 23, 2004 from the Department of Fish and Game; zero fiscal
note #3, dated March 23, 2004 from the Department of Health and
Social Services; and $84,300 fiscal note #4, dated March 26, 2004
from the Department of Law.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|