Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/15/2004 01:51 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 533
An Act relating to the state's administrative
procedures and to judicial oversight of administrative
matters.
LINDA SYLVESTER, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BRUCE WEYHRAUCH,
noted that Representative Weyhrauch was carrying the
proposed legislation for the House State Affairs Committee.
She commented that HB 533 was a part of a package put forth
by the Regulation Review Committee, Chaired by Senator
Therriault. The component is called Judicial extraction and
would address circumstances when there is an unreasonable
delay for an instate agency issue.
She stated that Representative Weyhrauch was interested in
carrying the bill, as it would address the impact of
unreasonable delays causing irreparable harm.
DAVE STANCLIFF, STAFF-REGULATION REVIEW COMMITTEE,
REPRESENTATIVE PETE KOTT, stated that HB 533 was the final
stage of a three-bill system, working through the
Legislature and providing a safety valve.
He referenced the data provided by Legislative Research. To
date, only half the agencies have reported in. It is worthy
to note for the record that since 1980, over 8,000
administrative cases have languished for more than a year.
That does not count the contract-hearing officers. Mr.
Stancliff commented it would be difficult to quantify how
that would affect State government knowing it is a huge
expense. The courts require that the administrative remedy
must be exhausted before they can be brought before the
court. He commented that the trick is to provide a safety
valve without providing too easy a way to opt out of
regulations. He noted that the sponsor had worked with the
Department of Law. By the time it makes it to court, the
court would have three options:
· Site the agency to speed the process up;
· Some type of alternate dispute resolution;
· Claim that it was out there long enough to
come to a resolution and in the matter of
public interest, the court would opt to
consider the case.
Mr. Stancliff pointed out that the theory is, once a safety
value is in place, on-going cases would become resolved.
The reform is not sweeping, but to the businesses and
citizens, it would be a sign that politicians understand
that there are cases, which have gone on too long, and that
there is an alternative option. It is anticipated that once
the Department of Environmental Conservation and the
Department of Education & Early Development weigh in with
the contract cases, there could be somewhere between 12,000
and 15,000 cases that have gone on for more than a year.
The cost is extraordinary.
Mr. Stancliff pointed out the indeterminate notes. The
intention is that once the cases are processed, the savings
would reduce that level by offsetting them. He offered to
answer questions of the Committee.
Representative Hawker asked about the fiscal note from the
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation. He pointed out that note
related to HB 553 (analysis) and should not be included in
the file for HB 533.
Representative Hawker noted that he was disappointed that
Representative Weyhrauch was not present. He asked if the
bill was a vehicle being considered as an administrative
relief language related to the expungement statute. Mr.
Stancliff replied that it had not been considered for that
reason. He discussed that they would respectfully request
that it remain "whole" as it is one part of a three-part
process. Ms. Sylvester interjected that Representative
Weyhrauch was very interested in expungement concept and had
investigated that.
Representative Foster MOVED to report CS HB 533 (JUD) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CS HB 533 (JUD) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with a new fiscal note by
Department of Law, indeterminate note #1 by the Alaska Court
System, indeterminate note #2 by the Commercial Fisheries
Entry Commission, and indeterminate note #3 by the
Department of Health & Social Services.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|