Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/30/2002 03:08 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 489
"An Act relating to cruelty to animals."
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CHENAULT, SPONSOR, spoke in support of
the legislation. He pointed out that it is well documented
that animal abuse is a precursor to child abuse. Studies
suggest that if animal cruelty is identified and treated as
a juvenile problem that a great deal of adult domestic abuse
could be avoided. The legislation would allow a prosecutor
to charge a person with cruelty for each animal found to be
neglected or abused. The legislation encourages courts to
mandate behavioral counseling and makes it a duty to report
abuse to an authority, while holding harmless a person who
in good faith makes the report.
Representative Chenault noted that the legislation was
modified in previous committees. He expressed concern with
the Department of Corrections' indeterminate fiscal note. He
pointed out that cruelty to animals would remain a
misdemeanor and did not think that it would cost the
department to implement the policy.
SUE WRIGHT, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE CHENAULT, provided
information on the fiscal cost. She observed that there have
been no added costs that they could determine to the states
that have implemented similar policies. She noted that only
extreme cases would trigger the provision, such as the one
in Sterling, where a women had 64 dogs, many of which were
frozen to the ground. In that case, under the legislation,
she could be charged with 64 cases of animal cruelty. Under
the current law she could only be charged with a maximum of
eight counts of animal cruelty.
Vice-Chair Bunde questioned if the legislation would
negatively impact Alaskan kennels that operate under a
reasonable standard. Representative Chenault noted it was
not the intent of the legislation to interfere with dog-
mushing activities or farm practices. He explained that the
animal control staff would make the determination of
cruelty.
Representative Lancaster MOVED to report CSHB 489 (JUD) out
of Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being
NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB 489 (JUD) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with two previously published
fiscal notes: COR #1 and LAW #2.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|