Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/11/1996 02:55 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 480 PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS
REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT, sponsor, said this legislation clarified
the process that is currently in place for granting a physician
assistant the authority to practice in the State and to prohibit
unfair insurance discrimination against them.
JACK HEESCH, Alaska Academy of Physician Assistants, said it is his
understanding from the Division of Insurance that inclusion of the
physician assistants on the nondiscrimination list does not
guarantee anybody a billing rate. He explained that insurance
companies pay what is usual and customary. People who work for a
doctor in a clinic and bill for physician services include the
physician, a physician assistant, an advanced nurse practitioner,
a physical therapist, an occupational therapist, an audiologist,
and a speech pathologist. These bill at what is called a physician
service rate.
The truth of the matter, he said, is that some physician assistants
who see a patient in a doctors office bill as a physician provided
service at the same rate the doctor does. In other cases they bill
at a lesser rate and in many cases at a substantially lesser rate.
The bottom line is AS21.36.090 (d) has nothing to do with what
anyone bills. It says that if a patient walks into a doctors
office, he doesn't have to be concerned if his insurance covers
seeing a physician assistant. It doesn't dictate the rate which is
up to the insurance companies to figure out.
SENATOR KELLY asked if anyone in the room objected to that
statement.
Number 165
JERRY REINWAND, Blue Cross, said the problem is that no one can
really explain what the antidiscrimination statute really does.
It's working because the Division has an interpretation that it
will work in a certain direction. If this interpretation is
correct, Mr. Heesch might be correct. No one knows. Their concern
is with what the statute really does and what does adding physician
assistants do, what are the cost and policy implications. He
thought it was a better idea to back off on this bill and let them
work with the Division of Insurance over the interim to define what
it really does before they add more to it.
Number 225
KATIE CAMPBELL, Division of Insurance, said they have historically
supported this section of the bill. She said the interpretation
they have given this discrimination section allows for payment of
a service if a provider is licensed to provide a service under our
statutes. Whoever is on that list can't be discriminated for a
service. It's not their interpretation that this is setting a fee.
The question has never come up, there are no court cases, there
have been no questions to the Division regarding that portion of
the bill.
MR. HEESCH said they would like the committee to add physician
assistants language that was found in SB 100.
SENATOR TORGERSON moved to add that language. There was discussion
and SENATOR KELLY said they would hold the bill until Tuesday and
directed staff to add the physician assistant language and the
intent to not set fees.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|