Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/17/2002 01:45 PM Senate CRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 455-MUNICIPAL TAXATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON stated this was a companion to Senator
Therriault's Senate bill that the committee heard the previous
week. Since the House bill came over it overcame the Senate bill.
PETER FELLMAN, staff to Representative John Harris, said HB 455
is the companion bill to SB 352, but there was a slight change
made by the House. They worked with the Office of the State
Assessor and changed some language on the last page of the bill.
They took out the word, "for farm use in accordance with this
section." and added, "based upon that restricted use." The
assessor thought the bill was acceptable to them with the change.
Alaska already recognizes there are agricultural restricted
lands, fee simple lands and agricultural lands that have a
covenant in this state. Under this legislation, it would free
farmers with agriculturally restricted land from having to apply
for the required annual exemption. They are trying to remove the
requirement because the land is already restricted in the state
and it is cumbersome to fill out an annual request to have the
land reassessed.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked for the approximate difference between the
current tax assessment and what it would be if this bill were
enacted.
MR. FELLMAN replied the assessment would still be made on the
value of the land. This will allow people with agricultural
restricted land to go to the borough assessor's office and make a
case for valuing their land on its agricultural use not on a fee
simple basis.
SENATOR LINCOLN said the bill was intended to reduce the
assessment on lands that are used for farms and that would reduce
the amount of money collected. She asked what the difference
would be because it could have an affect on the borough.
MR. FELLMAN said that would be between the assessor and the
people that own the agriculturally restricted land.
SENATOR AUSTERMAN asked for the assessed value of a piece of land
used for agricultural purposes if it were appraised [assessed] at
$100,000.00 as fee simple land.
MR. FELLMAN replied the law would stay the same for fee simple
land. It requires that if you are using fee simple land as
agricultural land, they you make an annual application and the
state assessor appraises what you are doing then makes a
determination. That wouldn't change under this legislation. This
bill would remove the requirement that agriculturally restricted
land be evaluated on an annual basis.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON asked Mr. Van Sant whether he had any
comments.
STEVE VAN SANT, State Assessor, explained this bill states that
those people with agriculturally restricted lands will no longer
have to go to the assessors office each year to fill out paper
work to remain in the agricultural tax deferment program.
Hypothetically, someone with agriculturally restricted land could
have some fee simple land that is worth between 3 thousand and 5
thousand dollars per acre. If that land owner is farming that
land and they apply to the assessor on an annual basis for the
deferment, it will be assessed in the neighborhood of 400 dollars
per acre and the remainder of that is being deferred out of the
program. Individuals who have those parcels are paying between
400 and 600 dollars per acre not the 4 thousand to 6 thousand
dollars per acre it might be assessed as fee simple.
SENATOR AUSTERMAN said that process is already going on. He
wanted assurance this bill only removes the requirement for the
annual deferment application.
MR. VAN SANT said that's what it does. Those people with the
agriculturally restricted lands wouldn't have to apply annually
and they would be assessed on the agriculturally restricted
value.
There were no further questions or testimony.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON asked for the will of the committee.
SENATOR AUSTERMAN made a motion to move HB 455 and attached
fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations.
There being no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|