Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/25/2002 02:35 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 443-TATTOOING AND BODY PIERCING
CHAIRMAN STEVENS announced HB 443 to be up for consideration.
MS. SHARON O'DELL, Chief of Staff for Representative Vic Kohring,
said in 2000 the legislature passed SB 34 to address safety and
health issues with the body piercing and tattoo industry by
bringing them under the licensing requirements of the Barbers and
Hairdressers Board. The qualifying application deadline was set
in statute, but didn't allow the department any kind of grace
period or an appeal process. Because of that there were qualified
practitioners who were already in business that will have to go
out of business because they missed that qualifying application
date. The practitioners they have talked to are in favor of the
regulations set forth in SB 34, but even though the department
did their best to notify everyone that would be affected by the
new regulations, some people just got left out. They are trying
to address that problem with those businesses that will have to
otherwise close. They would have to go through the process of
finding another practitioner who has gotten their license to get
them through the training period. It could be difficult to even
find someone in their area who is willing to take them on. This
is an unintentional result of the law that went into effect in
2000.
HB 443 does two things. It doesn't change any of the regulations
or the qualifying date set forth in SB 34. It extends the
transitional license application date to July 1, 2002 and extends
the license requirement date to December 1, 2000. There is a
fiscal note for the renotification because the DEC regulations
that have been adopted will go stale in October in this year
requiring renotification.
MS. GAIL MCCANN, Owner of the Electrolysis Clinic in Fairbanks,
supported HB 443. She is one of the individuals who would be
impacted by the bill not being passed. If it didn't pass, it
would definitely affect her livelihood and her ability to
continue offering her service. She uses a tattooing technique for
permanent and corrective cosmetics working with burn survivors,
as an example, who have gone as far as they can with
reconstructive surgery and want to take their improvement in
appearance a step farther. Many times a burn survivor will have
lost their facial hair - eyebrows and eyelashes and she can
tattoo those features. She said people with surgically corrected
cleft palates were another example of clients she served.
MR. JOE SCHOOLCRAFT, Two Moons Body Piercing and Tattooing, said
the tattooing community is small and he found it hard to believe
that some people didn't know about this. He thought if a person
missed the deadline that through the tattooing community they
could find someone who could reach out and help them. The test
has to do with sanitation and nothing with technique.
MR. TODD GIPSON, Two Moons Body Piercing and Tattooing, opposed
HB 443. He thought the interested parties should keep on top of
the laws and what's going on.
MR. JEFF MARTIN, Muttleys Tattoo Clinic, supported HB 443. He
said he is in transition and somehow missed the application time.
He has three employees who are affected as well.
MR. ANDY KOPCZENSKI, American Tattoo, said he had been in this
business for 22 years. He said he does the same thing that Ms.
McCann does about 10 times a week. He opposed this bill. The
fiscal note that goes with it comes out of the general fund,
which is his money. He didn't want to be charged for people "not
getting their homework done."
MR. KOPCZENSKI said, "This is another way to charge me for the
guy next door."
SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass CSHB 443(L&C) from committee with
individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was
so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|