Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/01/2004 03:32 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 431
An Act relating to the municipal dividend program; and
providing for an effective date.
ADAM BERG, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE MOSES, spoke in support of
HB 431, which will establish the municipal dividend fund.
The bill proposes to give every incorporated municipality a
set amount of money based on population. It would also
empower local officials by allowing them to decide where
that money would be best spent in their local communities.
The amount would be $250 dollars per person to each
municipality and would pay a dividend to the boroughs. The
formula is determined by the total population of the borough
minus the total population of the incorporated
municipalities within that borough. The appropriation would
come from the Earnings Reserve Account after dividends and
inflation proofing had been accounted for. In the event
that there is not enough money remaining in the Earnings
Reserve Account, municipal dividends would be reduced on a
prorated basis.
Mr. Berg referenced the "2004 - Survey of Municipal Fiscal
Conditions" provided by the Alaska Municipal League. (Copy
on File).
JON BOLLING, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE), CITY
ADMINISTRATOR, CITY OF CRAIG, testified in support of HB
431. He identified the hardships that the loss of municipal
assistance and revenue sharing has caused many of the
communities in Alaska. He urged the adoption of a mechanism
that will provide annual funding.
KEVIN RITCHIE, ALASKA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, JUNEAU, testified in
support of the legislation. He stressed that municipalities
across the State are suffering from financial loss and that
bill proposes a municipal dividend. The public does
understand the concept, as it essentially would be a
permanent fund dividend for communities, resulting in leaner
State government as municipalities take on more issues. The
cost would be approximately $157 million dollars. If the
previous revenue sharing programs had been maintained, the
cost would have been well over $200 million.
Representative Stoltze questioned if unorganized areas had
been included in the concept. Mr. Ritchie did not think
unorganized communities were included.
Representative Joule questioned how many unorganized
communities would be left out. Mr. Ritchie did not know.
Mr. Berg interjected that there are between 70 & 80
unincorporated communities excluded. In response to a
question by Representative Croft, Mr. Berg noted that under
the previous program, unincorporated communities each
received $10 thousand dollars.
Co-Chair Williams stated that HB 431 would be HELD in
Committee for further consideration.
#
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 4:51 P.M.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|