Legislature(2007 - 2008)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/17/2008 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB417 || HB417 | |
| HB348 || HB348 | |
| HB364 || HB364 | |
| HB236 | |
| HB406 |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 236 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 255 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 406 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 364 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 348 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 417 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 417
An Act relating to the compensation for certain public
officials, officers, and employees not covered by
collective bargaining agreements; relating to pay
increments for longevity in state service; and
providing for an effective date.
Co-Chair Meyer reminded the Committee of the status of the
bill and described the fiscal notes.
Representative Gara recapped previous questions regarding
employee shortages the State is facing due to the salary
schedule and salary review system. He had asked Commissioner
Kreitzer the conditions under which it would possible to go
from step A to F in order to hire someone.
2:25:36 PM
KEVIN BROOKS, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION (DOA), replied that currently there is not a
mechanism for granting advanced steps based on a shortage in
a job classification.
Representative Gara thought the system was arcane. He
thought HB 417 should be able to do something about the
situation. He wanted a provision saying an employer can go
between steps if needed to fill a position. Co-Chair Meyer
was not sure HB 417 was the right bill for the change.
Representative Gara thought the bill was the right place to
change the hiring system to allow a department to exercise
discretion rather than having the Legislature telling them
what to pay people.
Mr. Brooks acknowledged Representative Gara's point, which
addressed the primary reasons for the creation of the
Administrative Workgroup on Recruitment and Retention. The
Department of Administration has found different impediments
in the hiring system in different departments. The goal is
to look at the entire system, including geographical
differences, the classification system, and the pay system.
The situation is complex, but the Department is committed to
working through the problems.
2:29:11 PM
Mr. Brooks added that there is some flexibility through
using the criteria of recruitment difficulty, exceptional
qualifications, or both. Recruitment difficulty is the
factor that addresses shortages. Some departments are
limiting themselves by doing State-only recruitments, and he
worried that that limited candidate pools.
Representative Gara stated that sometimes the problem is
that the salary offered is inadequate, regardless of other
criteria. He wanted to address the issue of the ability to
pay more in those situations.
Mr. Brooks promised that DOA is looking at where there is a
shortage of workers, and said in those cases there is some
ability to offer a higher step.
2:33:34 PM
Representative Joule thought there might be two different
discussions. Mr. Brooks said similar issues do exist for
both union and non-union groups, but the bill addresses non-
covered employees. In many cases the solutions will be the
same, including adjusting pay.
Co-Chair Meyer asked if there were classifications with
flexibility to go above the normal grade range. Mr. Brooks
replied that there were fully exempt classifications, oil
and gas positions specifically, paid on salary overrides;
they get paid what the market will bear. Co-Chair Meyer
wondered if similar strategy could be used in the
departments. Mr. Brooks replied that would mean moving
classified employees to the exempt service, from union
representation to non-union representation, with
accompanying challenges and issues.
Representative Gara turned the discussion to the non-union
employee issue. He said there are still shortages. He
thought a provision could be put into the bill along the
lines of: "The commissioner of an agency may offer any of
these step ranges if needed to fill an open position." He
wanted give the agency commissioner the authority to make
the decision as needed. Mr. Brooks believed that the
authority already exists for non-classified, non-union,
fully or partially exempt employees, where there are
shortages.
2:37:54 PM
Representative Gara asked if the agency could offer up to an
F step if needed to fill a shortage. Mr. Brooks responded
that there is nothing that simple. Criteria are set to try
and maintain consistency in the pay system. The typical
criteria used are recruitment difficulty, as demonstrated by
a lack of qualified candidates, or exceptional
qualifications, or both.
Representative Kelly commented that the difficulty with
making it too easy to go to an F step is that supervisors
can do it for the wrong reasons and throw the whole system
off. He thought it would be difficult to make such a complex
change with an amendment.
Co-Chair Meyer pointed out that there was not an amendment
yet.
2:40:34 PM
Representative Gara asked if the ability to move from an A
to an F because of a shortage applied to union employees.
Mr. Brooks answered that an agency can and does offer up to
an F, using the same criteria.
Co-Chair Chenault MOVED to REPORT CSHB 417(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and attached new
fiscal note by the Alaska Court System, new fiscal note by
the Legislative Affairs Agency, and new fiscal note by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Representative Gara OBJECTED for discussion. He stated that
there are major shortages and that he was very dissatisfied
with the Administration's answers. He thought the attempt to
keep the budget down resulted in a refusal to address the
reality that many people are being underpaid. The bill will
help non-union employees get pay increases as they get older
and their expenses go up. The bill will not help union
people if the union isn't powerful enough to get the same
thing into a labor contract. He did not agree that people
should be treated differently because of being union or non-
union. A human being should not be left at the same salary
level, especially taking into consideration cost of living
changes.
Representative Gara WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB 417(FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with "no
recommendation" and attached new fiscal note by the Alaska
Court System, new fiscal note by the Legislative Affairs
Agency, and new fiscal note by the Office of Management and
Budget.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|