Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/15/2010 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB350 | |
| HB413 | |
| HB393 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 413 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 393 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 350 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 413-YOUTH ACADEMY FUNDING/REPORT
8:28:34 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 413, "An Act relating to the Alaska Challenge
Youth Academy."
8:28:49 AM
KATIE KOESTER, Staff, Representative Paul Seaton, Alaska State
Legislature, paraphrasing from a prepared sponsor statement,
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
The Alaska Challenge Youth Academy is a residential
high school for students who have dropped out of
regular school. The Academy is highly successful with
a 70% graduation rate and works closely with the
National Guard following a strict model that gives
students structure, challenge, and discipline. The
Academy is located in Anchorage and has two sessions a
year where students live on campus for 5 months while
going through the rigorous program. After they
graduate from the program, staff continues to track
their behavior through a mentorship program. Students
are considered a success if a year after graduation
they are enrolled in a postsecondary program, the
military, or in full time employment.
Funding for the Academy is based the following
formula: 7 times the Base Student Allocation (BSA)
times all residential students plus .6 times the BSA
times all non-residential students. When this formula
was constructed in 2002 it reflected the dollars they
needed to operate. However, as the BSA has grown over
the years to cover retirement costs and other
increases in education this has resulted in a windfall
and is no longer reflective of the true cost of the
program.
HB 413 would set a per child amount for state dollars
in statute, $11,990 and multiply that by the number of
residential and non-residential students enrolled.
The Academy and the Department of Education and Early
Development both agree this would give them sufficient
dollars to run the program. Under HB 413 the
projected total state dollars they would receive in
fiscal year 2011 would be approximately $5.2 million,
within $300 of the amount they would get under the
current formula. Alaska Military Youth Academy also
receives separate federal funds that supplement this
amount ($2.7 million for FY2011).
The Academy is a valuable alternative that requires
higher funding as a residential program for at-risk
youth than other boarding schools. HB 413 identifies
an appropriate and transparent way to fund this
important educational institution.
8:30:37 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the allocation for the Alaska
Military Youth Academy (Academy) would be adjusted if the BSA is
adjusted in the future.
MS. KOESTER answered that the legislature would need to change
statute if the BSA rate is adjusted.
8:31:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER recalled the legislature has been trying
to avoid "locking in" rates in other bills and works to allow
flexibility for funding changes. She asked how the figure of
$11,990 was determined.
MS. KOESTER responded that the figure was based on seven times
the BSA for FY 11 and divided by the number of students at the
Academy.
8:32:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ for the reason that statute change is
necessary if the $11,990 is close to the BSA amount.
MS. KOESTER replied that establishing a fixed number is statute
is more reflective of the actual services received, but
maintains the allocation through the foundation formula, which
allows for automatic contributions from the department.
8:33:25 AM
CHAIR SEATON added that the question which has arisen is that
the base student allocation increases and the academy receives a
seven times multiplier to calculate the state's contribution.
Additionally, the program receives a substantial amount of
federal funding. He explained the desire to keep the program in
the realm of education instead of moving it to the Department of
Military & Veterans' Affairs. This maintains the program in the
Department of Education and Early Development.
8:35:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH asked how many times funding adjustments
have been requested for this program.
MS. KOESTER answered that since the inception of the program in
2002, that this is the first request for a funding adjustment to
the program.
8:36:14 AM
CHAIR SEATON opened public testimony on HB 413.
8:36:20 AM
MCHUGH PIERRE, Deputy Commissioner, Chief of Staff, Office of
the Commissioner/Adjutant General, Department of Military &
Veterans' Affairs (DMVA), said HB 413 is a priority of the DMVA
and the department supports this bill. The AMYA was established
in 1996 and the formula for the current funding structure, seven
times the BSA, was established in 2002. He reported that
previously 40 to 50 cadets graduated per class and with the
funding formula increase the number of cadets increased to about
100 cadets per class. Due to the $2500 increase in the BSA the
DMVA received a substantial increase and it has become evident
that the amount received from the state was in excess of the
need. He stated the department supports the change the bill
makes. The bill would "freeze" the $11,990 per student figure.
He offered his belief that if the AMYA needs additional funding
the legislature will respond appropriately. He stated that the
BSA was increased to cover some of the Teacher Retirement System
(TRS) obligation. The DMVA decided to offset some of the Public
Employee Retirement System (PERS) costs. While the DMVA has
used the funding appropriately, sufficient funding has been
received to meet cadet needs. He explained that the federal
funding is provided based on benchmarks. He anticipated federal
funding will continue to increase as the program expands. He
reported that the AMYA is one of the best programs in the
nation, in part, due to the state contributions to the program.
8:39:29 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH asked for the number of times between 1996
and 2002 that the DMVA has asked for funding increases for the
AMYA.
MR. PIERRE indicated that he was not certain. He stated that
any department requests for additional funding have been made
based on an increase the number of cadets in the program.
MR. JEANS clarified that HB 413 would remove the direct link to
the BSA and place a "per student" amount in statute in the
amount of $11,990. He said that the AMYA will need to justify
further increase requests.
8:41:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked how the funding for the AMYA compares
to other residential programs, such as Mount Edgecumbe High
School.
MR. JEANS responded that it is comparable overall. He offered
that the AMYA has a component that other residential programs do
not currently have, which is the "student tracking" for an
additional year.
CHAIR SEATON asked whether he was indicating the state funding
or the federal funding for the AMYA.
MR. JEANS clarified that the state funding is comparable to what
is provided for Mt. Edgecumbe, Nenana Academy of Higher Learning
(NAHL) and Galena Interior Learning Academy (GILA).
8:42:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER asked for clarification on whether Nenana
and Galena also receive federal funding.
MR. JEANS answered no, they do not. He explained that Nenana's
NAHL and Galena's GILA obtain their educational funding from the
foundation program. Several years ago, the legislature passed
"boarding school funding" so the schools receive some
residential funding. Mt. Edgecumbe High School is operated by
the state and receives instructional funding through the
foundation program and their residential component is within the
Department of Education and Early Development (DEED).
8:42:52 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER asked for the rationale for funding the
AMYA differently than the other programs in the state.
MR. JEANS explained that the AMYA is not part of the public
school system, but is operated by the DMVA. In 2002, the DMVA
asked for a funding formula to support them in a fashion similar
to public schools, including the residential facilities. At
that time the DEED developed the formula and increases to the
BSA were targeted for specific reasons. The big increases came
from the increases to the PERS and Teachers Retirement System
(TRS) contributions. The TRS increased at a rate much higher
than the PERS rate. Thus, increases in the BSA were made to
help districts offset the additional costs. The DMVA employees
are PERS employees so their rate of contribution was increasing
at a smaller rate. This did not necessarily equate to needing
seven times BSA multiplier each time the BSA was increased.. He
noted that the AMYA funding has been highlighted for a number of
years during the budget process and the funding for the program
contained in HB 413 is a "little simpler" method.
8:44:46 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH inquired as to whether the tracking
mechanism of students is a useful tool for the DMVA.
MR. JEANS answered yes.
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH related that post-graduation information has
been identified as valuable information. He asked whether the
legislature might consider expanding the tracking to other
student programs in the future.
8:45:38 AM
MR. JEANS stated that the unique student identifier in K-12
education will become a means for tracking throughout a
student's career, including trend analysis. He stated that it
may also apply to pre-Kindergarten programs, as well.
8:46:42 AM
CHAIR SEATON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 413.
8:47:00 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ moved to report HB 413 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, HB 413 was reported from the
House Education Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 393 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/24/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/31/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| HB 393 Charter School statutes.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/24/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| back up AMYA.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 413 |
| HB413-EED-ESS-3-10-10.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 413 |
| sponsor statment HB413.docx |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 413 |
| HB 393 Charter School Background.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/24/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Support ltr fed dir.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Per pupil fac aid.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Fed Funding.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Discret Grants.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| AK Grade 10.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Support public.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/31/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| FY02-11LocalEffortAssessed&educationWithMills-2Pager_10-22-09.xlsx |
HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| HB350-EED-ESS-2-18-10.pdf |
HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| current program flow chart.docx |
HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| Sponsor Statement HB 350.doc |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |