Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
04/14/2022 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB349 | |
| HB411 | |
| HB402 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 402 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 411 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 411-MUNICIPAL TAX EXEMPTIONS/DEFERRALS
8:53:23 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 411, "An Act relating to municipal tax
exemptions and deferrals on economic development property."
8:53:39 AM
RYAN JOHNSTON, Staff, Representative Calvin Schrage, Alaska
State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Schrage, prime
sponsor, noted those who would give invited testimony during the
hearing on HB 411.
8:54:14 AM
MIKE EDGINGTON, representing self, noted that he is the co-chair
of the Girdwood Board of Supervisors, which had not developed a
position on HB 411; therefore, he is speaking on his own behalf.
He said under current law, some communities are unable to make
full use of municipal tax exemptions [related to economic
development property]. He said although Girdwood is a separate
community in terms of government, it is within the Unified
Municipality of Anchorage. Girdwood addresses this by having
its own service area, including police, fire, roads and
drainage, and parks and recreation. He said about 40 percent of
Girdwood's taxes fund these services, and the rest go to
schools. He reviewed that in 2007, the legislature expanded the
ability of municipalities to provide tax incentives for local
economic development but excluded service areas run by an
elected board. He noted that Girdwood is affected by the high
cost and low availability of housing. He stated that he is
asking for a small, targeted change [to statute] so that
Girdwood can qualify to offer the tax exemptions. He pointed
out that there are a number of other communities across the
state that would also benefit from this change.
8:58:20 AM
MR. EDGINGTON, in response to a question from Representative
McCarty, explained that the Girdwood Board gives a
recommendation for the tax level to the Municipality of
Anchorage, which then approves it. He said his recollection is
that the Municipality of Anchorage has never disapproved a tax
submitted by Girdwood. In response to a follow-up question, he
said the Municipality of Anchorage is bound by state statute,
and it has taken the language of the statute to apply the
restrictions on taxes being imposed in service areas.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY expressed concern that a service area
will come to the state because it does not like the decision of
the local home-rule [municipality].
MR. EDGINGTON clarified that the situation at hand is that both
the service area of Girdwood and the Municipality of Anchorage
are in agreement but cannot do anything about it because of
statute.
9:03:02 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN noted there was a lawyer on line to testify.
9:03:24 AM
MR. EDGINGTON, in response to Representative Prax, confirmed
that a service area cannot exempt general taxation. In response
to a follow-up question, he maintained his understanding that
the assembly has veto power over a service area's desire for a
tax exemption.
9:06:14 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE clarified the issue is that even if a
municipality wishes to allow the tax exemption to the service
area, it is prohibited from doing so by statute.
9:06:46 AM
MR. EDGINGTON, in response to Representative Drummond, confirmed
there is not a current project being considered for tax
exemption, but if there were, both the Girdwood Board and the
Municipality of Anchorage would have to approve it for it to be
allowed, provided HB 411 is passed in order to change the
statute.
9:07:46 AM
MR. EDGINGTON, in response to Representative McCarty, clarified
that the limitation is on elected boards; there are other
service areas in Anchorage that do not have elected boards, and
the restriction on tax exemption does not apply to them.
9:09:09 AM
WILLIAM "BILL" FALSEY, representing self, stated that he is a
private practice attorney testifying today in his personal
capacity. He specified that the limitation being discussed is
found in AS 29.45.50(m). He noted that service areas are a
concept authorized by Article 10, Section 5, of the Constitution
of the State of Alaska, and they are common. He confirmed the
information about the board operated service areas and the
exclusion added in 2017 and the concern behind it. He said HB
411 is particularly meaningful in places like Girdwood; it would
allow the Girdwood Board to opt out by passing a resolution of
objection no later than 30 days after the local ordinance. He
emphasized the 30-day window would come after all public notice
requirements were made. He expressed his strong support of the
proposed legislation.
9:14:59 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE noted that at the last committee hearing, there
had been discussion about the notice requirement. He asked
whether there would be a problem if the notice were changed to
60 days.
MR. FALSEY described the process to illustrate the ample public
notice that would occur prior to the 30-day window. That said,
he remarked that he did not see any reason to oppose a 60-day
notice.
9:17:00 AM
MR. FALSEY, in response to a question from Representative
McCarty as to whether there are things that state law should
preclude local governments from doing in terms of taxation and
exemption, said philosophically he is "more in the camp of
trusting the local elected officials." He said he thinks if
there were no state restrictions, then the local governments
would work those issues out appropriately.
9:19:07 AM
MR. FALSEY, in response to a question from Representative
Drummond regarding other service areas, explained the
differences between Girdwood's board-operated service area and
others in terms of tax exemptions.
9:22:39 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN opened public testimony on HB 411. After
ascertaining no one wished to testify, she closed public
testimony.
9:23:52 AM
MR. JOHNSTON, in response to Co-Chair Hannan, concluded, "As the
municipality might have a veto, the service area boards also
still retain the ability to opt out, and we think that addresses
the issue of the 2017 concerns."
9:24:18 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN expressed her understanding of Juneau's
government, saying that she does not think there are elected
boards in any of the borough's service areas.
9:25:45 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN announced that HB 411 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 411 Back up Service Area Statute.pdf |
HCRA 4/14/2022 8:00:00 AM |
HB 411 |
| HB 349 Sectional analysis.pdf |
HCRA 4/14/2022 8:00:00 AM |
HB 349 |
| HB 349 Supporting Document - Image.pdf |
HCRA 4/14/2022 8:00:00 AM HRES 4/27/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 349 |
| HB 349 Examples of well spacing issues 4.14.22.pdf |
HCRA 4/14/2022 8:00:00 AM |
HB 349 |