Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
04/12/2022 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB167 | |
| HB349 | |
| HB402 | |
| HB411 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 167 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 402 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 411 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 411-MUNICIPAL TAX EXEMPTIONS/DEFERRALS
9:14:34 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 411, "An Act relating to municipal tax
exemptions and deferrals on economic development property."
9:14:48 AM
RYAN JOHNSTON, Staff, Representative Calvin Schrage, Alaska
State Legislature, presented HB 411 on behalf of Representative
Schrage, prime sponsor. He said the bill seeks to allow
municipalities to offer tax exemptions and deferrals on economic
development property within service areas. The bill would amend
AS 29.45.050(m) to allow the exemptions and deferrals, but it
would provide a 30-day window for the service areas to concur or
disagree with the potential tax deferral.
9:16:33 AM
ROBERT PEARSON, Local Government Specialist V, Community Aid &
Accountability Section, Division of Community and Regional
Affairs, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic
Development, in response to a question from Representative
Drummond as to the definition of "special service area", offered
his understanding that the definition is in statute, but he did
not know it offhand.
9:18:57 AM
MR. JOHNSTON, in response to a concern from Representative Prax
that some service areas may not meet often enough to be able to
respond within 30 days, said that possibility has been
considered by the bill sponsor, and one idea would be to specify
30 days "from notice" to the service area. To a follow-up
question, he confirmed the bill sponsor's office has been in
contact with the Fairbanks North Star Borough.
9:21:03 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND said by-laws for meeting notification
may result in the need for the notice proposed under HB 411 to
be increase to 60 or 90 days. She said again she would like a
definition of service areas.
9:21:39 AM
MR. JOHNSTON, in response to Representative McCarty, gave
Girdwood as an example of service area governed by a board and a
place that cannot be offered economic development incentives by
the Municipality of Anchorage. In response to a follow-up
question, regarding why Girdwood would be approaching the state,
he offered his understanding that when the statute was first put
in place, there was concern that a municipality could "do
anything" without [consulting] with the service area. He said
he would seek a better answer for Representative McCarty.
9:24:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX said he thinks it is fair to say that
currently a second-class borough could grant tax exemption from
borough imposed taxes, but should not be allowed to require the
service area to agree to the tax exemption of the service area
tax. He offered his understanding that that could be done
today, and that is what HB 411 is trying to prevent.
9:25:06 AM
MR. PEARSON said he thinks Representative Prax is correct. He
said the makers of the existing statute were trying to avoid a
situation by disallowing it altogether; whereas HB 411 would
allow it with the approval of the service area.
9:26:21 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND noted the government structure of
Anchorage and how it is different from that in Girdwood.
9:27:04 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN asked Mr. Pearson for knowledge about what
statute allows for service areas within municipal governments
and how many of them there are.
MR. PEARSON estimated there are potentially hundreds of service
areas that could be affected by HB 411. In response to a
follow-up question, he said there are property taxes in various
sized city governances, but there are many jurisdictions without
property taxes.
9:29:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX surmised that citizens could establish a
service area which taxes itself in order to have police
protection, for example.
9:30:28 AM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND offered an example of expansion of a
police service area in Anchorage.
9:31:52 AM
MR. JOHNSTON, in response to a request from Representative Prax
for a definition of "economic development property", directed
attention to the definition on page 2, lines 8-24.
9:33:12 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN announced that HB 411 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB167 VerO.SupportingLetters2.4.11.22.pdf |
HCRA 4/12/2022 8:00:00 AM |
HB 167 |