Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/18/1996 02:20 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 405 BD OF OPTOMETRISTS; OPTICIANS
SENATOR KELLY announced HB 405 to be up for consideration.
ROGER POPPE, Staff to Representative Kott, sponsor, said HB 405
extended the Board to 2002, clears up a conflict between
optometrists and opticians, both of whom have assistants who assist
them in dispensing glasses and contact lenses. It's been the
opticians position that any dispensing would have to come under
their jurisdiction. So optician apprentices would have to be
qualified to this and that would include all assistants who are
working for optometrists and ophthalmologists. After much debate
a decision was made in favor of the optometrists. So people who
work for opthomologist or optometrists do not have to have their
assistants be licensed as optical assistants or optician
apprentices.
He explained that section 4 was a housekeeping provision. Section
5 eliminates statutory references one of which is the requirement
to have branch offices for the Board - no longer necessary in
Alaska. In addition there are some requirements that opticians
have to meet certain visual and health requirements. They are the
only Board that had this requirement so there was some concern that
this wasn't constitutional and might involve litigation under the
Americans With Disabilities Act. So the advice of Legislative
Budget and Audit was to eliminate the reference.
CATHERINE REARDON, Division of Occupational Licensing, supported HB
405.
RANDY WELKER, Legislative Auditor, said HB 405 addressed all their
audit's concerns.
LARRY HARPER, licensed optician, said he is currently serving on
the Board of Directors of the National Contact Lens Examiners which
is the nationally certified testing agency for contact lens
fitters. He said in the 1980 sunset review the legislature
intentionally removed the exemption that existed at that time for
optometrists and their employees. The reason then, as now, is if
opticians are licensed, they should be licensed regardless of where
they are employed.
People in the State of Alaska have a right to expect that opticians
are licensed regardless of where the purchase is made. They have
been licensed for 23 years and there is no reasonable way to
determine whether a person is qualified to perform their duties
except by licensure. Giving optometry this exemption effectively
creates a two tier level of competence within the field adding to
consumer confusion.
There is no way for an optometrist or a physician to adequately
supervise all that goes on in their office. In addition it would
create an unfair competitive advantage for optometrists and shows
a blatant disregard for the Alaskan public.
SENATOR KELLY said they would set HB 405 aside while the connection
with Fairbanks was reestablished.
SENATOR KELLY announced HB 405 to be up for consideration once
more.
MR. HARPER, testifying from Fairbanks, said the two people who were
going to testify from Fairbanks, James Rothmeyer and Pam Gajdos,
are associates of his and were going to testify along the same
lines as he did.
SENATOR TORGERSON moved to pass HB 405 from committee with
individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|