Legislature(1997 - 1998)
05/01/1998 02:25 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 405
"An Act relating to failing to stop a vehicle when
directed to do so by a peace officer."
Co-Chair Therriault MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1 (copy on
file).
JAMES HORNADAY, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE KOTT stated that the
sponsor supports the amendment. He added that
representatives of the Anchorage Police Department and the
Department of Public Safety also support the amendment. He
explained that the amendment would add new language: "A
person commits the offense of failure to stop at the
direction of a peace officer in the first degree if the
person violates (b) of this section and during the
commission of that offense, the person violates a traffic
law or commits another crime." The amendment also provides
that "crime" has the meaning given in AS 11.81.900; and
"traffic law" has the meaning given in AS 28.15.261.
Co-Chair Therriault observed that there are approximately
330 of these types of violations on a yearly basis. The
Department of Law indicated that that they would try to
prosecute these offenses as felonies. He observed that the
Department of Law could prosecute with the use discretion in
order to reduce the fiscal impact. The Anchorage Police
Department supports full prosecution of violations.
CHRIS STOCKARD, CAPTAIN, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
explained that it is currently a class B misdemeanor to
elude a police officer. The legislation increases the
penalty and creates a new felony category for more serious
violations. There are approximately 20 states that have
made fleeing a police office a felony offense.
There being NO OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was adopted.
(Tape Change, HFC 98 - 140, Side 2)
In response to a question by Representative Grussendorf, Mr.
Stockard clarified that a person must knowingly elude a
police officer. The police officer's vehicle must be marked
appropriately so that a reasonable person would recognize it
as a law enforcement vehicle. If the officer is not
operating a vehicle they must be in a clearly recognizable
uniform.
Mr. Hornaday pointed out that there is a definition of
"knowingly" in AS 81.900.
Representative Mulder asked if the legislation would act as
a deterrent.
Mr. Stockard observed that the Anchorage Police Department
feels that it would be a deterrent. The Department of
Public Safety is less certain. He explained that officers
would include information about the law in their school
presentation.
Co-Chair Therriault asked if forfeiture of the vehicle was
considered as a deterrent. Mr. Hornaday stressed that
forfeiture is difficult to enforce.
Representative Davies asked if persons in an emergency
situation would be charged with eluding a police officer.
Mr. Stockard emphasized that generally persons in an
emergency situation will stop because they want the police
to assist them.
Representative Grussendorf spoke in support of the
legislation.
Representative Mulder MOVED to report CSHB 405 (FIN) out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal notes.
CSHB 405 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with "no
recommendation" and with four fiscal impact notes, one by
the Department of Corrections, one by the Alaska Court
System, one by the Department of Administration, and one by
the Department of Law dated 3/9/98.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|