Legislature(2005 - 2006)BUTROVICH 205
04/06/2006 08:30 AM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB318 | |
| HB400 | |
| HB272 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 272 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | HB 318 | ||
| = | HB 400 | ||
HB 400-CONFISCATION OF FIREARMS
9:35:54 AM
CHAIR RALPH SEEKINS announced CSHB 400(FIN) to be up for
consideration.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHN COGHILL informed the committee that he
addressed the concerns of the committee in the previous bill
hearing of how to handle people in governmental positions who
violated an oath of office. He deferred to Mr. Guaneli to
explain an amendment that he was prepared to offer.
DEAN GUANELI, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Department of
Law (DOL), advised the committee that he checked on the various
public officials that could be subject to the provision and
crafted a mechanism for achieving the removal of office. The
primary people who would be subject to the provision are police
officers who would use their authority to confiscate firearms.
Potentially the governor or the mayor could come under the
provision but it would be unlikely.
9:39:15 AM
MR. GUANELI proposed the amendment and said it basically said
that a person convicted under the crime of confiscating firearms
under disaster circumstances would be subject to revocation of
the person's police officer certificate. Subsections (2) and (3)
address elected public officials. This doesn't eliminate the
possibility of a lawsuit but it does say that a person convicted
would be subject to impeachment. Subsection (3) outlines the
removal of elected officials. The proposed amendment would use
existing statutory mechanisms to provide for the removal of a
person from office.
9:42:28 AM
SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS asked Mr. Guaneli whether there were
public safety officials that wouldn't fall under the provision.
MR. GUANELI replied that Village Public Safety Officers (VPSOs)
fall under the authority of the Alaska State Troopers and it is
a very loose administrative approval process so that presents a
problem.
CHAIR SEEKINS noted they wouldn't have a certification to lose,
although they would lose their position.
9:44:56 AM
SENATOR GUESS asked whether a VPSO would get an exemption if
they were directed by a trooper to confiscate firearms.
MR. GUANELI said the intent is that they would not fall under
the exemption but by law they have peace officer authority.
SENATOR GENE THERRIAULT moved Amendment 1.
24-LS1543\X.1
Luckhaupt
A M E N D M E N T 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE
TO: CSHB 400(FIN)
Page 1, line 7, through page 2, line 1:
Delete all material and insert:
"Sec. 26.23.205. Confiscation of firearms. (a) A
person convicted of official misconduct under AS 11.56.850,
or interference with constitutional rights under
AS 11.76.110, as a result of confiscating, attempting to
confiscate, or ordering the confiscations of a firearm,
under color of law, during a disaster emergency,
(1) forfeits any appointed government position
and, if under the jurisdiction of the Alaska Police
Standards Council, is subject to revocation of the person's
police certification;
(2) is subject to impeachment under art. II,
sec. 20, Constitution of the State of Alaska; or
(3) is subject to having the person's elected
municipal office declared vacant under AS 29.20.170 or
29.20.280.
(b) This section does not apply if the person is
acting as a private citizen who has been directed to
confiscate a firearm by another whom the person reasonably
believes to be a peace officer or active member of the
armed forces or militia.
(c) A conviction described in (a) of this section is
an offense involving a violation of the oath of office for
purposes of AS 29.20.170 or 29.20.280."
Hearing no objections, the committee adopted the Amendment 1.
SENATOR THERRIAULT asked for clarification whether there was a
clear definition of confiscation. He posed a hypothetical
situation of a person stealing his neighbor's firearm in a
disaster situation in order to protect himself.
MR. GUANELI responded that was discussed in other committees and
everyone recognized that the taking of a weapon in order to
protect the public would not be something the DOL would
prosecute.
9:48:15 AM
SENATOR GUESS said a police officer that suspects that a person
intends to harm another would have the duty and the right to
confiscate that weapon.
MR. GUANELI added that HB 400 is not intended to prevent police
officers from stopping criminal activity.
SENATOR CHARLIE HUGGINS moved SCS CSHB 400(JUD) from committee
with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes.
Hearing no objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|