Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/23/2002 01:39 PM House FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 399 An Act relating to the Uniform Mechanical Code and other safety codes; annulling certain regulations adopted by the Department of Community and Economic Development relating to the mechanical code that applies to certain construction contractors and mechanical administrators; and providing for an effective date. REPRESENTATIVE LESIL MCGUIRE, SPONSOR, spoke in support of the legislation. She observed that the Committee could adopt a proposed committee substitute, which would return the legislation to its original form or adopt the House Labor and Commerce version of the legislation. The House Labor and Commerce version is the product of a compromise. House Bill 399 was created to correct a separation of powers violation. She noted that as the chairman of the Administrative Regulation Review Committee she has reviewed at least 25 issues questioning if the regulations comport with the original intent of the legislation. She noted that HB 399 was the first bill that she has introduced to annul regulations. There are three statutes that reference the Uniform Mechanical Code, which is a trademark proprietary document. Representative McGuire referred to AS 8.40.270(3) governing the examination of a mechanical contractor applicant. Applicants must be familiar with the following codes: Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot Tub Code, and Uniform Solar Energy Code, and the Uniform Mechanical Code. There is a four-year code cycle. In September 2002, the Department of Public Safety made a move to adopt regulations that would implement the International Mechanical Code. She noted that the Division of Occupational Licensing intended to follow suit. Representative McGuire pointed out that when the legislature chooses a technical term, as they have with the Uniform Mechanical Code, that those terms are presumed to have the technical meaning. She maintained that a department has decided to make a policy issue based on the actions of another department, which is in violation of law. She pointed out that the Division of Occupational Licensing opted to change their regulations in direct violation to what the legislature placed in statute. She stressed that she indicated to the division that she was willing to work with them and cautioned that there would be an clear issue of the separation of powers and that any change should come through legislation. There are severe arguments regarding the merits of International Code versus Uniform Mechanical Code. She pointed out that people are going to be passionate about what they do and their livelihood. TAPE HFC 02 - 91, Side B Representative McGuire stressed that the legislature guides policy and maintained that the change is being spearheaded by one major urban area. The entire state is under the Uniform Mechanical Code. There are people in the business that know the code, which has been changed "overnight" through a regulation. Representative McGuire noted that the first version would repeal the regulations. She pointed out that the Municipality of Anchorage has postponed the adoption of the th International Mechanical Code until May 10. The second version recognizes that there may be a move to adopt the International Mechanical Code and would test under both. Representative McGuire discussed the Department of Community and Economic Development's fiscal note for $40 thousand dollars. The department noted in their proposed fiscal note that the state Fire Marshal currently uses the International Code, which would be superceded by the legislation and require new licensing tests that would need to be rewritten. She argued that the bill specifically allows the 1997 test to be given. Representative McGuire stressed that it would be a bad precedent to allow a department to adopt regulations on the basis of regulations adopted by another department, in direct contrast to statute adopted by the legislature. She maintained that the issue is black and white. There is a law on the books that specifies mechanical code that should not be changed until the legislature adopts a change. Representative Harris questioned which version of the legislation she supports. Representative McGuire responded that although there is a move to go to the International Mechanical Code, all the participants have not been at the table. She observed that the "little guys" weren't at the table. She supports continuation of the Uniform Mechanical Code until the process has been followed (House Finance Committee proposed committee substitute 22-LS1461\O). She observed that the O version carries no fiscal note. CATHERINE REARDON, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, spoke to the fiscal note. She explained that she submitted a zero fiscal note to the House Labor and Commerce [the fiscal note was not adopted by the House Labor and Commerce Committee]. HB 399 was heard and HELD in Committee for further consideration.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|