Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/23/2002 01:39 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 399
An Act relating to the Uniform Mechanical Code and
other safety codes; annulling certain regulations
adopted by the Department of Community and Economic
Development relating to the mechanical code that
applies to certain construction contractors and
mechanical administrators; and providing for an
effective date.
REPRESENTATIVE LESIL MCGUIRE, SPONSOR, spoke in support of
the legislation. She observed that the Committee could
adopt a proposed committee substitute, which would return
the legislation to its original form or adopt the House
Labor and Commerce version of the legislation. The House
Labor and Commerce version is the product of a compromise.
House Bill 399 was created to correct a separation of
powers violation. She noted that as the chairman of the
Administrative Regulation Review Committee she has reviewed
at least 25 issues questioning if the regulations comport
with the original intent of the legislation. She noted that
HB 399 was the first bill that she has introduced to annul
regulations. There are three statutes that reference the
Uniform Mechanical Code, which is a trademark proprietary
document.
Representative McGuire referred to AS 8.40.270(3) governing
the examination of a mechanical contractor applicant.
Applicants must be familiar with the following codes:
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa, and Hot
Tub Code, and Uniform Solar Energy Code, and the Uniform
Mechanical Code. There is a four-year code cycle. In
September 2002, the Department of Public Safety made a move
to adopt regulations that would implement the International
Mechanical Code. She noted that the Division of
Occupational Licensing intended to follow suit.
Representative McGuire pointed out that when the
legislature chooses a technical term, as they have with the
Uniform Mechanical Code, that those terms are presumed to
have the technical meaning. She maintained that a
department has decided to make a policy issue based on the
actions of another department, which is in violation of
law. She pointed out that the Division of Occupational
Licensing opted to change their regulations in direct
violation to what the legislature placed in statute. She
stressed that she indicated to the division that she was
willing to work with them and cautioned that there would be
an clear issue of the separation of powers and that any
change should come through legislation. There are severe
arguments regarding the merits of International Code versus
Uniform Mechanical Code. She pointed out that people are
going to be passionate about what they do and their
livelihood.
TAPE HFC 02 - 91, Side B
Representative McGuire stressed that the legislature guides
policy and maintained that the change is being spearheaded
by one major urban area. The entire state is under the
Uniform Mechanical Code. There are people in the business
that know the code, which has been changed "overnight"
through a regulation.
Representative McGuire noted that the first version would
repeal the regulations. She pointed out that the
Municipality of Anchorage has postponed the adoption of the
th
International Mechanical Code until May 10. The second
version recognizes that there may be a move to adopt the
International Mechanical Code and would test under both.
Representative McGuire discussed the Department of
Community and Economic Development's fiscal note for $40
thousand dollars. The department noted in their proposed
fiscal note that the state Fire Marshal currently uses the
International Code, which would be superceded by the
legislation and require new licensing tests that would need
to be rewritten. She argued that the bill specifically
allows the 1997 test to be given.
Representative McGuire stressed that it would be a bad
precedent to allow a department to adopt regulations on the
basis of regulations adopted by another department, in
direct contrast to statute adopted by the legislature. She
maintained that the issue is black and white. There is a
law on the books that specifies mechanical code that should
not be changed until the legislature adopts a change.
Representative Harris questioned which version of the
legislation she supports. Representative McGuire responded
that although there is a move to go to the International
Mechanical Code, all the participants have not been at the
table. She observed that the "little guys" weren't at the
table. She supports continuation of the Uniform Mechanical
Code until the process has been followed (House Finance
Committee proposed committee substitute 22-LS1461\O). She
observed that the O version carries no fiscal note.
CATHERINE REARDON, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL
LICENSING, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT, spoke to the fiscal note. She explained that
she submitted a zero fiscal note to the House Labor and
Commerce [the fiscal note was not adopted by the House
Labor and Commerce Committee].
HB 399 was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|