03/17/2022 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s):|| Department of Administration, Commissioner|| Confirmation Hearing(s): | |
| SB7|| HB255 | |
| HB271 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 396 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | SB 7 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 255 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE STATE AFFAIRS STANDING COMMITTEE
March 17, 2022
3:06 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Chair
Representative Matt Claman, Vice Chair
Representative Geran Tarr
Representative Andi Story
Representative Sarah Vance
Representative James Kaufman
Representative David Eastman
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
- HEARD
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(JUD)
"An Act requiring the Department of Public Safety to publish
certain policies and procedures on the department's Internet
website."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 255
"An Act requiring the Department of Public Safety to publish
certain policies and procedures on the department's Internet
website."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 271
"An Act relating to the Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority; and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 396
"An Act restricting certain investments of state funds in
certain Russian entities; and providing for an effective date."
- BILL HEARING CANCELED
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SB 7
SHORT TITLE: STATE TROOPER POLICIES: PUBLIC ACCESS
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) GRAY-JACKSON
01/22/21 (S) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
01/22/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/22/21 (S) STA, JUD
03/04/21 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/04/21 (S) Heard & Held
03/04/21 (S) MINUTE(STA)
03/11/21 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
03/11/21 (S) Heard & Held
03/11/21 (S) MINUTE(STA)
04/22/21 (S) STA AT 3:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
04/22/21 (S) Moved SB 7 Out of Committee
04/22/21 (S) MINUTE(STA)
04/23/21 (S) STA RPT 3NR 1AM
04/23/21 (S) NR: SHOWER, HOLLAND, COSTELLO
04/23/21 (S) AM: KAWASAKI
05/10/21 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
05/10/21 (S) Heard & Held
05/10/21 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
02/16/22 (S) JUD AT 1:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
02/16/22 (S) Moved CSSB 7(JUD) Out of Committee
02/16/22 (S) MINUTE(JUD)
02/18/22 (S) JUD RPT CS 1AM 2DP 2NR SAME TITLE
02/18/22 (S) AM: HOLLAND
02/18/22 (S) DP: MYERS, KIEHL
02/18/22 (S) NR: HUGHES, SHOWER
03/08/22 (S) TRANSMITTED TO (H)
03/08/22 (S) VERSION: CSSB 7(JUD)
03/09/22 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
03/09/22 (H) STA, JUD
03/17/22 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 255
SHORT TITLE: STATE TROOPER POLICIES: PUBLIC ACCESS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) TARR
01/18/22 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/7/22
01/18/22 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/18/22 (H) STA, FIN
03/17/22 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 271
SHORT TITLE: AIDEA: MEMBERSHIP; RESPONSIBILITIES
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) JOSEPHSON
01/18/22 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/14/22
01/18/22 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/18/22 (H) STA, FIN
03/17/22 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
PAULA VRANA, Commissioner Designee
Department of Administration
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as commissioner designee of the
Department of Administration.
SENATOR ELVI GRAY-JACKSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Introduced CSSB 7(JUD), as the prime
sponsor.
KEITH BAUGUESS, Staff
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided a sectional analysis of SB 7, on
behalf of Senator Gray-Jackson, prime sponsor.
LIEUTENANT ERIC OLSEN
Alaska State Troopers
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions during the hearing on
CSSB 7(JUD) and HB 255.
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Introduced HB 271, as the prime sponsor.
ELISE SORUM-BIRK, Staff
Representative Andy Josephson
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions and provided a
PowerPoint presentation during the hearing on HB 271, on behalf
of Representative Josephson, prime sponsor.
ACTION NARRATIVE
3:06:42 PM
CHAIR JONATHAN KREISS-TOMKINS called the House State Affairs
Standing Committee meeting to order at 3:06 p.m.
Representatives Vance, Kaufman, Tarr, Story, and Kreiss-Tomkins
were present at the call to order. Representatives Claman and
Eastman arrived as the meeting was in progress.
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
^Department of Administration, Commissioner
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
Department of Administration, Commissioner
3:08:45 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the first order of business
would be a confirmation hearing for Commissioner Designee Paula
Vrana, Department of Administration (DOA).
3:09:11 PM
PAULA VRANA, Commissioner Designee, DOA, summarized her work
experience and career history. She recounted her three-year
tenure at DOA serving as the deputy commissioner, noting that
the experience gave her a deep understanding of the department.
She concluded by sharing more about her personal history.
3:14:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE inquired about Commissioner Designee
Vrana's goals for the department.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA listed the following goals for DOA:
complete the consolidation of human resources, the Office of
Information Technology, the Shared Services of Alaska, and the
Office of Procurement and Property Management. She projected
that the consolidation initiatives could be completed by the end
of 2022. She spoke of her commitment to serving the other
departments and the people of Alaska with the best customer
service possible.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked what the commissioner designee's
priorities would be after the consolidation was completed.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA said the next step would be to
stabilize and assess the efficiencies gained from consolidation.
3:17:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN referenced the sizeable appropriation
request from the Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS)
for the recent data breach. He asked for an assessment of DOA's
cyber security.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA said cyber security was a top
priority for DOA. She believed that the state's cyber security
posture was healthy; however, constant reassessment,
improvement, and modernization was required.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked about the department's ability to
receive feedback regarding cyber security and react to it in a
timely manner.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA said employees were trained on
reporting concerns through the proper avenues.
3:21:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY noted the large number of employees working
in the Division of Personnel, DOA. She asked about staff morale
throughout the consolidation process and asked what steps would
be taken to assess employee morale and make adjustments.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA opined that the State of Alaska
(SOA) employees were the state's greatest resource; further, she
believed in always staying in touch with staff morale. She
addressed "change fatigue," which DOA staff had experienced at
times, she shared.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY sought to understand a specific situation
in which 44 positions were transferred and then recalled.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA explained that a number of positions
moved to the Office of Procurement and Property Management, DOA,
in July 2021; however, the decision was made to pause that
consolidation due to considerations around the IRIS upgrade.
Because of that, those positions were rerouted to their initial
home in the Office of Procurement and Property Management.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether DOA required a strong
rationale for transferring or consolidating positions.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA said typically, the consideration of
a duty station or a position location was taken on a case-by-
case basis.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY inquired about the process by which a
position's location was assessed.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA shared her understanding that the
decision on where to recruit for a position belonged to DOA;
however, a change in duty position ultimately resided with the
Office of Management & Budget (OMB).
3:27:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked whether Commissioner Designee Vrana
was still an active member of the Alaska Bar Association.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA answered yes.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN returned to the topic of cyber security.
He inquired about the department's capacity to respond to a
cyber security attack and whether there were enough personnel.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA pointed out that DOA housed the
State Security Office, which was entirely dedicated to cyber
security matters. She believed that the dedicated team in the
State Security Office had enough resources in the event of a
cyber security attack.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN contended that the commissioner designee
was talking about prevention, as opposed to response. He
considered a scenario in which a data breach occurred in the
Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and asked whether the
department could respond in an effective way.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA stated that the department had
planned its response in the event of a cyber security attack.
Further, she recalled that when an incidence had occurred, DOA's
daily work was not negatively impacted.
3:32:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN shared some specific complaints made by
constituents; one involved an individual who needed to modify
his retirement plan, which required a form that was approved by
DOA. The citizen in question reported that it took over a month
for the department to respond. He asked whether Commissioner
Designee Vrana had heard of similar problems.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA said she would have to look into
that situation, adding that it was concerning to hear. She said
she had not heard of the Division of Retirement and Benefits
falling behind or dealing with a backlog.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN requested that Commissioner Designee Vrana
follow up with more information. Additionally, he recounted a
constituent's complaint regarding a delay in death benefits. He
surmised that the department lacked sufficient personnel to
accomplish its work.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA pointed out that the delay may have
been in the Vital Statistic Department, DHSS, which was outside
the control of the Division of Retirement and Benefits. She
offered to follow up on that situation.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN reiterated his concern about essential
service delays due to a shortage of staff in state departments.
3:36:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inquired about the current policy on
communication between legislators and department employees.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA explained that communication between
legislators and state employees in their official capacity must
flow through the legislative liaison in both directions.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked what distinguished personal
capacity from official capacity.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA said it would be assessed on a case-
by-case basis.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether a department employee who
reported fraud, waste, or abuse to a legislator via the
legislative liaison would be penalized.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA said she would always encourage an
employee to report any instances fraud, waste, or abuse.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether there would be a penalty if
a department employee reported fraud, waste, or abuse to a
legislator without going through the liaison.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA was unsure of the answer. She
declined to speak on generalities.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inquired about the department's plans for
the use of the IP addresses managed by DOA.
COMMISSIONER DESIGNEE VRANA was unfamiliar with the IP addresses
referenced by Representative Eastman. She stated that during
the pandemic, SOA purchased many laptops to enable telework for
employees across the state; however, she was not familiar with
any concerns regarding IP addresses since the distribution of
those laptops.
3:42:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR noted that the Public Defender Agency and
the Office of Public Advocacy were among the myriad of
responsibilities headed by the department. She expressed her
hope that both would be prioritized.
3:43:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN moved to advance the confirmation of Paula
Vrana, commissioner designee for the Department of
Administration, to the joint session of the House and Senate for
consideration. He reminded members that signing the reports
regarding appointment to boards and commissions in no way
reflected individual members' approval or disapproval of the
appointees, and that the nominations were merely forwarded to
the full legislature for confirmation or rejection. There being
no objection, the confirmation was advanced.
SB 7-STATE TROOPER POLICIES: PUBLIC ACCESS
HB 255-STATE TROOPER POLICIES: PUBLIC ACCESS
3:43:59 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the next order of business
would be a combined hearing of CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 7(JUD),
"An Act requiring the Department of Public Safety to publish
certain policies and procedures on the department's Internet
website" and HOUSE BILL NO. 255, "An Act requiring the
Department of Public Safety to publish certain policies and
procedures on the department's Internet website."
3:44:38 PM
SENATOR ELVI GRAY-JACKSON, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, introduced CSSB 7(JUD). She paraphrased the sponsor
statement [included in the committee packet], which read as
follows [original punctuation provided]:
This bill would require that the Department of Public
Safety publish on their website the department's
current policies and procedures related to the conduct
of peace officers employed or regulated by the
department. The duty of the Department of Public
Safety is to ensure public safety within our
communities and, as such, the public must be able to
easily access the current policies and procedures that
requires peace officers regulated by the department to
adhere to.
3:46:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR, prime sponsor of HB 255, provided brief
introductory remarks. She noted that HB 255 did not include the
same amendments as its companion bill, CSSB 7(JUD), which were
adopted during the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee (SJUD).
3:46:51 PM
KEITH BAUGUESS, Staff, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of
Senator Gray-Jackson, prime sponsor, presented a sectional
analysis of SB 7 [included in the committee packet], which read
as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Section 1: Amends AS 44.441.020 to add the Department
of Public Safety shall publish on their website the
current policies and procedures related to the conduct
of peace officers employed or regulated by the
department.
3:47:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked what inspired the sponsor to draft
this bill.
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON remarked, "I was inspired to bring this
bill forward."
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked what inspired her.
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON said she was inspired by recent events,
such as the death of George Floyd and others. She referenced
[similar] incidents in the Municipality of Anchorage in 2019.
3:48:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether the changes made in SJUD
added the Village Public Safety Officers provision.
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON answered yes. She explained that a second
amendment was also adopted in SJUD, which clarified that any
confidential information that disclosed the techniques and
procedures for enforcement investigations would not be provided;
further, that any guidelines for law enforcement investigations
and prosecutions would be excluded as well.
3:49:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether a member of the public who
was using the website would be able to see what information was
excluded.
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON deferred the question to Lieutenant Olsen.
3:51:09 PM
LIEUTENANT ERIC OLSEN, Alaska State Troopers (AST), said the
website noted that any redactions had been limited to those that
were applicable to AS 40.25.120(a)(6)(E)-(G).
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked, "Are those roughly similar to the
exemptions listed in this statute or is there a way of tying
those two things together?"
LIEUTENANT OLSEN asked Representative Eastman to clarify the
question.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked if the bill were to pass, whether
the department would reference, on the website, the exemptions
in this bill.
LIEUTENANT OLSEN said the department would have to consult with
the commissioner's office. He offered to follow up with the
requested information.
3:53:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked how many pages of policy currently
existed.
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON said she had no idea.
LIEUTENANT OLSEN answered hundreds of pages.
3:54:22 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that CSSB 7(JUD) and HB 255 were
held over.
HB 271-AIDEA: MEMBERSHIP; RESPONSIBILITIES
3:54:57 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 271, "An Act relating to the Alaska
Industrial Development and Export Authority; and providing for
an effective date."
3:55:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, introduced HB 271. He paraphrased the sponsor
statement [included in the committee packet], which read in its
entirety as follows [original punctuation provided]:
HB 271 aims to improve upon the governance structures
of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority (AIDEA) and provides legal mechanisms for
additional transparency and oversight of this public
corporation.
Currently, AIDEA is under considerable scrutiny from
the public and the media. Concerns have been raised
about the integrity of decision-making processes used
by the authority and relating to personnel matters
within the authority. These concerns have been
aggravated by extensive use of executive sessions
during AIDEA board meetings, limited public engagement
on major development projects, a perceived lack of
responsiveness to public comments and little
transparency in AIDEA's business agreements.
First established in 1967, AIDEA has a long and
complex history. Over the years, the role AIDEA plays
in the economy of the state has shifted and its
financing programs have expanded markedly. AS 44.88,
the chapter of statute governing the authority, is a
hodgepodge of various funds, programs, and legal
requirements. There is little in statute to ensure
that AIDEA acts in the best interest of the public and
state economy when financing projects and little
required scrutiny. HB 271 would address these issues
by restructuring the AIDEA Board to be more diverse
and less susceptible to political whims of any given
administration. It would also create a uniform set of
processes for approval of projects requiring $10
million in financing (or more) and would require the
authority to be forthright with the public about
business dealings and contracts.
Additionally, under the framework created by HB 271,
AIDEA would systematically analyze the impacts of
projects at all stages of development and outcomes
after completion to ensure that AIDEA is in fact
achieving the statutory directives of promoting
balanced growth of the economy, creating stable
employment opportunities in the state, and providing
state businesses with adequate financial and technical
assistance.
The need for AIDEA reform has been discussed
perennially and this reform is timely. HB 271 provides
the necessary framework for AIDEA to become a
transparent and trusted development finance
organization, work
4:05:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE thanked the bill sponsor for calling
attention to this issue of transparency and the Alaska
Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA's) tendency
to call sporadic executive sessions for lengthy amounts of time.
She asked how the bill would address that concern and provide
better interface with the public.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said Representative Vance had
highlighted one issue in the bill that needed further
development. He opined that there were times when executive
session makes sense, such as litigation; however, AIDEA {"the
authority") was in executive session "all the time." He
welcomed a friendly amendment on the matter.
4:07:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN observed that Section 6 updated the 15-
day requirement for notice of proposed action. He suggested
that notice should be posted on AIDEA's website and asked
whether that would be considered a friendly amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said, "Definitely."
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inquired about the legal implications of
removing the language "at the pleasure of the governor" [on page
1, line 14].
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON explained that his intention was to
depoliticize the provision, which dealt with public membership
of the authority. He added, "The part that our attorneys
would want to offer you advice on is less that concern than the
confirmation issue."
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked the bill sponsor to speak to the
"confirmation issue."
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON stated that AIDEA was not a regular
government department; therefore, the governor's absolute
appointing authority was in question.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN turned attention to Section 6, which
changed the allotted time for public testimony from "a total
period of at least one hour" to "not less than two minutes". He
asked whether that provision had been abused by AIDEA in the
past. Additionally, he asked whether the new language could
unintentionally limit public testimony.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON recounted receiving many complaints
from members of the public regarding AIDEA's long executive
sessions, insufficient notice, and the inability to participate
from 2019-2021.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed concern that the written
responses to public comment may necessitate a substantial amount
of additional work for the authority. He asked whether the bill
sponsor's intent was for AIDEA to send a general response.
Further, he expressed his hope that the authority would not be
required to respond to each individual comment if there were
thousands.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON directed attention to the language in
question on page 3, line 7, and acknowledged that it could use
some editing.
4:16:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether it was customary to delineate
a time limit on public testimony in statute.
4:17:34 PM
ELISE SORUM-BIRK, Staff, Representative Andy Josephson, Alaska
State Legislature, pointed out that the existing AIDEA statute
laid out a one-hour minimum for public testimony. In changing
that language, she said the bill sponsor's intent was to ensure
that every member of the public was heard.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE suggested that AIDEA should be required to
post public notice of the start time for public testimony so
that members of the public weren't missing their chance to call
in.
MS. SORUM-BIRK reiterated that the bill was a starting point.
4:20:03 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK introduced the PowerPoint presentation, titled
"HB 271; AIDEA Reform and Transparency" [hard copy included in
the committee packet]. She began on slide 2, which highlighted
media headlines concerning AIDEA.
4:21:10 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK outlined a sectional analysis of the proposed
legislation on slide 3, which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
? Sections 1 through 3 and 13- Board confirmation and
composition.
? Section 4- Executive Director confirmation and
personnel policies.
? Sections 5 and 6- Processes for adopting regulations
and receiving public input.
? Section 7- AIDEA dividend to state.
? Sections 8 and 9- Project oversight and approval
processes.
? Section 10- Prioritization of projects based on
furthering existing state policies.
? Section 11- Development of performance metrics
related to legislative intent.
? Section 12 - Public access to AIDEA records.
? Section 14- Transitional language.
? Section 15- Effective date.
4:26:23 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK skipped slides 4-5 and outlined transparency of
records and outcomes on slide 6, which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Current Law- AS 44.88.215
? HB 386 (ch 109 SLA 1998) first added the
confidentiality language to statute
? This language was further strengthened by HB 90
(ch 71 SLA 2010).
? Per legislative records- before 1998 loan applicants
had to fill out a waiver.
? Under the Alaska Public Records Act (AS 40.25)
exceptions already exist for financial information
required to be kept confidential under federal law.
4:28:34 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK skipped slide 7 and proceeded to outline
alignment with state policies and legislative intent on slide 8,
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
? State Energy Policy (AS 44.99.115)
? Coordinated and comprehensive approach to energy
efficiency and conservation
? Economic development through development of both
renewable and nonrenewable energy resources
? Supporting Applied Research to alternative and
emerging technologies
? State administrative centralization and coordination
with federal initiatives
? State Arctic Policy (AS 44.99.105)
? Development with lens of vibrant communities and
healthy environment
? Positive investment climate through strategic
infrastructure
? Safe and secure maritime transport
? Integration of Indigenous knowledge into
conventional research
? Legislative Intent for Creation of AIDEA
? Creation of year-round employment
? "Balanced growth of economy"
? Business benefiting through financial and technical
assistance
? Supporting/ creating exports
MS SORUM-BIRK concluded on slide 9, which questioned what
Alaskans and the legislature wanted AIDEA to be, whether it be a
development finance organization, a state funded bank, an
economic development authority for the state, an investor in
extraction industries, or a driver for green energy.
4:31:40 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the bill was held over.
4:32:49 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
State Affairs Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 4:32
p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Paula Vrana Resume 2022_Redacted.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
|
| SB 7 Explanation of Changes v. A to v. B.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Sponsor Statement v. B.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Version B.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Supporting Document - Letters Received by 4.12.2022.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7-Fiscal Note 1 DPS-AST-02-27-21.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7-Fiscal Note 2 DPS-DET-02-11-22.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Sectional Analysis v. B.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| SB 7 Supporting Document - APD and California Peace Officers Association Policies and Procedures 1.26.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/13/2022 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/25/2022 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
SB 7 |
| HB 271 Background- 2021 AIDEA Annual Report.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Background- Catsi- Economic Development Financing- 2015.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Background- Essayad and Gordon- ISER- Evaluation of Future Purposes- 1990.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Background- Fay- History of Megaprojects- 2003.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Hearing Request 2.24.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Presentation 3.16.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Sectional Analysis 3.15.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Sponsor Statement 2.24.22.pdf |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Version A.PDF |
HSTA 3/17/2022 3:00:00 PM |
HB 271 |