Legislature(2005 - 2006)BELTZ 211
04/04/2006 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB311 | |
| SB312 | |
| SB272 | |
| HB393 | |
| HB394 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 394 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 311 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 312 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | SB 272 | ||
| += | HB 393 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CSHB 394(L&C)AM-INSURANCE POLICIES IN FOREIGN LANGUAGES
CHAIR CON BUNDE announced CSHB 394(L&C)AM to be up for
consideration.
MICHAEL PAWLOWSKI, staff to Representative Kevin Meyer, sponsor
of HB 394, said that according to the last census, more than
80,000 Alaskans speak a language other than English at home.
Even though they are still required to purchase
insurance, there is an obstacle in state law to a
company providing them with associated materials or
policies that are published in a foreign language. The
problem is that since the law is silent on which
version of policy, be it the non-English version or
the English version, is the official version. And
since insurance contracts and policies are interpreted
against the insurance company with all of the
associated materials brought in, and since no
translation is ever perfect and there can be plenty of
disagreement in court as to the nuances of a word,
companies are reluctant to publish policies, pamphlets
and materials in a language other than English. This
has led to a growing portion of our population not
being adequately served.
As the chairman said, insurance polices are hard
enough to understand in our own language. And to ask
someone to wade through the minutia of a contract
without supporting materials for informational
purposes is detrimental to them trying to conduct
regular business in the state of Alaska. So, the
sponsor introduced HB 394 to remove that obstacle from
statute, put adequate barriers in to prevent
misrepresentation of information and to clarify that
these are to be only for informational purposes. He
believes that this will lead to a freer market in the
state to conduct business and serve Alaskans that
truly need the service.
CHAIR BUNDE asked if it requires any one to try to provide
written information in any language.
MR. PAWLOWSKI replied no, it requires nothing of anyone. It only
removes an obstacle to allow people and companies to pursue a
business activity that they might want to.
2:09:31 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS asked about language on page 2, line 6, that
says an "insurer may not misrepresent information in an
insurance policy ....translated into a language other than
English" and asked if he could only misrepresent in English.
MR. PAWLOWSKI replied that was a good question, but that
language came from, AS 21.36.030 on misrepresentation and false
advertising. The actual activity in English is covered under a
separate statute.
2:10:28 PM
JEFFERY TROUTT, Deputy Director, Division of Insurance, said he
was here primarily to answer questions, but wanted to expound on
some of the issues raised. He recalled that the Division had
received two health policies in Spanish. An English translation
was sent along with it. Under that circumstance he said he would
consider the Spanish version as the operative version. However,
business phrases might mean one thing in Mexico and another in
Chile or El Salvador. He said, "It's good to have an anchor so
everybody knows what version you are working on."
MR. TROUTT said he viewed this as a consumer protection bill
that would encourage insurance companies to provide materials in
a form that people could understand and his Division supported
the legislation. He strongly supported Senator Seekins' point
about lying stating:
To me, I believe a lie is a lie whether it's in
English, Spanish, Tagalong or Mandarin. And I would
apply Section 21.36.120 and .140 against anybody, no
matter what language they were lying in. But even
though I believe those two statutes apply to
misrepresentation in a foreign language, as somebody
who works in enforcement, I don't mind you giving me a
little extra rope to hang the bad guys with.
2:13:11 PM
SHELDON WINTERS, State Farm Insurance, said that State Farm is
the largest insurer of homes and autos in the United States and
in Alaska. He supported CSHB 394(L&C) AM saying it would help
better serve State Farm's customers by providing more meaningful
information to them.
This bill is needed, first, because it deals with the actual
insurance policy forms that get filed with the Division.
Currently, if a non-English version is filed, there is no law as
to which version controls and he understands that the Division
has unofficially assumed that the non-English version
controlled. He suggested that two requirements be met - one,
that both versions are filed and, two, that both versions
provide notice to the consumer that this is for informational
purposes and the English version controls.
Secondly, Mr. Winters said that insurance companies provide
brochures describing coverage and other information to consumers
and that is impossible if the consumer doesn't speak English.
The problem is with court interpretation of such materials and
the inherent subtle differences between an English version and a
non-English version. Alaska's Supreme Court has ruled if there
is a dispute about what a policy provides, the court has to not
only look at the actual policy language, but at any other extra
evidence that the consumer may have looked at or relied upon.
That would include the advertising or the brochures the industry
provides to them.
Other jurisdictions that allow policies and advertising material
to be produced in a non-English version can produce a lot more
information and he used California as an example. Twelve other
states have laws that allow what is trying to be done here.
However, most other states don't require an English and non-
English version to be produced. Some don't even require the
notice that the English version controls, but he believed that
was good for the consumer.
CHAIR BUNDE remarked that this seems to be a relatively simple
and non-controversial bill.
2:18:15 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved to pass CSHB 394(L&C) am from committee
with individual recommendations and attached zero fiscal note.
Senators Davis, Ellis, Ben Stevens, Seekins and Chair Bunde
voted yea; and CSHB 394(L&C) am moved from committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|