Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/29/2010 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB209 | |
| HB206 | |
| HB393 | |
| HB206 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 209 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 206 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 393 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 393-CHARTER/ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL FUNDING
CHAIR SEATON announced the next order of business would be HOUSE
BILL NO. 393, "An Act relating to charter school approval and
funding."
8:16:14 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER expressed his interest in a "recap" of [HB
393]. He related that supporters of the bill are disappointed
in its progress, and asked about the possibility looking at
charter school issues, one by one, next session.
8:17:28 AM
CHAIR SEATON replied that the bill has not been rescheduled for
hearing as further information was needed. He reviewed some of
the unanswered questions regarding provisions of the bill.
8:18:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER clarified that a charter school is a
public school, thus it is housed in a building owned by the
school district. The bill calls for additional funding in the
amount of $1,000, or up to $1 per participating student, into a
program that will allow any charter school to request a federal
grant. This is necessary because one of the scoring criteria of
a federal grant is whether the state is supportive for charter
school facilities; therefore, the intent of the bill was to
"just get that grant in place." However, EED advised the cost
of administering and distributing the funding would be high.
Representative Keller opined this issue does not have to do with
the ownership of the building, although charter schools can meet
in private buildings.
8:19:59 AM
CHAIR SEATON observed that the main aspect of the bill included
a reimbursement schedule that would raise costs for school
districts in five years. Furthermore, the bill mandated a
financial commitment from schools districts and EED for matching
grants, without a clearly designated source of funding. Also,
because the grants were going to the charter schools, the
question of the ownership and liability of the building was
raised. Additional hearings on HB 393 were not scheduled,
awaiting a response to the questions from Representative
Keller's staff.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER stated he will provide answers to Chair
Seaton's questions from the drafter of the bill, and further
information on the intent of the bill from its original sponsor.
8:23:52 AM
CHAIR SEATON concluded that federal funding for charter schools
may be limited, "since they've committed all of their money to
two states for five years." In addition, states are required to
participate in the federal Race to the Top grant program, but
Alaska is not participating. On the other hand, he surmised the
elimination of the "60 cap" was not influencing any member of
the committee.
[HB 393 was held over.]
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH acknowledged the gallery and suggested the
participants may wish to address the committee.
8:24:08 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CS HB 206 (EDC) April 22 workdraft.pdf |
HEDC 1/20/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/31/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 206 |
| HB 393 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/24/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/31/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| AK Grade 10.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Response_HouseEd (2).docx |
HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM |