Legislature(2009 - 2010)BARNES 124
03/16/2010 10:15 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB365 | |
| HB389 | |
| HB246 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 365 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 389 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 246 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 389-COMMERCIAL FISHING LOAN ACT
10:25:11 AM
CHAIR EDGMON announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 389, "An Act relating to loans made to commercial
fishermen under the Commercial Fishing Loan Act for energy
efficiency upgrades; and providing for an effective date."
10:25:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PAUL SEATON, Alaska State Legislature, sponsor,
introduced HB 389 as a bill that addresses investments that
encourage Alaska's workforce and the utilization of Alaskan
products. It allows for a lower loan rate on loans through the
Division of Investment, Department of Commerce, Community, &
Economic Development (DCCED) if the borrower uses products that
are manufactured in Alaska. A manufacturer of refrigeration
units for fishing vessels proposed the bill in order to provide
an incentive for the purchase of Alaskan products.
10:27:01 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to adopt CSHB 389 as the working
document. Hearing no objection, CSHB 389 was before the
committee.
10:27:24 AM
KATIE KOESTER, Staff to Representative Paul Seaton, Alaska State
Legislature, further explained the bill, paraphrasing from a
prepared statement [original punctuation provided]:
HB 389 allows the Department of Commerce, Community, &
Economic Development to give Commercial Fishing Loan
Fund borrowers a reduction in the interest rate on
their loan of up to 2 percent if 50 percent of their
loan is spent on a product produced or manufactured in
the State of Alaska.
MS. KOESTER continued to explain that the loan programs eligible
for this rate reduction are the Product Quality Enhancement and
Engine Efficiency Replacement programs, and include products
such as refrigeration units, ice machines, slush bags, and more
fuel efficient engines. She pointed out the legislation defines
"manufactured or produced" as processing, developing, or making
an item into a new item with a distinct character and use. Ms.
Koester noted that labor is often 30 percent of the cost of a
project and said that the sponsor wanted to emphasize that the
loan is focused on the product, not the labor. Furthermore,
this is voluntary to the department, and DCCED may choose when
to make the program available, depending on the prime interest
rate.
MS. KOESTER pointed out minor changes made by the committee
substitute (CS) including the addition of the Product Quality
Enhancement program, and language that requires the department
to offer the rate reduction to all applicants.
10:30:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH noted the committee packet does not contain
any comments on the bill.
10:31:00 AM
MS. KOESTER advised that Representative Seaton's office has not
received any objections to the program; if so, any written
objections would have been included in the committee packet.
10:31:02 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER requested a list of products manufactured
in Alaska that would qualify for a loan. He pointed out that
energy efficient engines are not manufactured locally.
10:31:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON stated that there are several
manufacturers of refrigeration units in Alaska, as well as
accessory refrigeration equipment and possibly ice machines.
Although there may not be engine manufacturers now, the purpose
of the bill is to encourage the production of engines, possibly
the newer, lighter-weight diesel engines, in Alaska. In
addition, as the energy efficiency money now available will spur
additional interest in local manufacturing of products such as
thermal pane windows, this type of legislation will provide an
incentive for investment in manufacturing in Alaska.
Representative Seaton further explained that this provision does
not affect the fishermen's loan fund, but only changes the
interest rate, and "will only be there when the Division of
Investments has interest loans that they can absorb this without
losing money on that loan for the services."
10:34:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER gave an example of a loan application for
an upgrade to a boat, and asked whether the loan amount would
only be for equipment, or if labor would be included.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON responded that at least 50 percent of the
loan proceeds used by the borrower must be for product quality
improvements. In fact, the manufactured equipment installed
must be 50 percent of the loan, not including labor, but the
total amount of the loan can include labor. He advised that the
Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development
(DCCED), Division of Investments, provided guidance on this
aspect of the legislation.
10:36:51 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER asked for clarification regarding the
possibility of obtaining a loan for a labor-intensive project.
10:37:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON deferred the question to a representative
from DCCED.
10:38:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT, reflecting on her experience as a fisher
from Bristol Bay, offered her support for the bill, especially
as it will provide for quality-of-fish upgrades for boats. She
reminded the committee that each fishery is trying to improve
the quality of its fish by adding refrigeration or slush bags,
and this is a valuable program for exported products.
10:39:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked for a description of a slush bag.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON described how a slush bag is installed in
each section of the hold of a boat, and how it works to reduce
the need for ice while improving the quality of fish products.
10:40:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI referred to the definition of
"manufactured or produced," and asked whether the construction
of a kit purchased elsewhere would qualify as a product made in
Alaska.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON advised that the construction of a
refrigeration system from materials would quality; however, the
installation of a product would not.
10:42:04 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI restated his question.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON recommended clarification from the
Division of Investments on this issue.
10:42:34 AM
CHAIR EDGMON referred to page 1, line 14, of the bill, and
suggested the addition of "in Alaska" after "new item."
10:42:58 AM
CHAIR SEATON pointed out that on page 1, line 10, the language
of the bill specifies "products manufactured or produced in the
state," and he expressed his belief that is sufficient.
10:44:00 AM
CATHY JEANS, Systems Branch Manager, Division of Investments,
Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development,
informed the committee that the Division of Investments is the
agency that administers several state loan programs, including
the commercial fishing revolving loan fund amended by this
legislation. She advised that the bill allows the agency to
reduce the interest rate if a borrower purchases an item
manufactured or produced in Alaska. Ms. Jeans called attention
to the zero fiscal note submitted with the bill.
10:44:56 AM
GEOFF WHISTLER, Lending Section Manager, Division of
Investments, Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic
Development, provided the example of an Alaska company that
ships in an engine and then adds a power generator. In that
case, he advised that the borrower should look at the value
added, and the cost of the addition, to measure the percentage
of the manufacture of the product in the state.
CHAIR EDGMON observed that is the interesting part of the bill.
In fact, the agency would need to determine regulations to carry
out the statute. He asked whether the language in the bill is
sufficient for the successful development of regulations.
10:46:27 AM
MS. JEANS advised her agency may need to confer with the
Department of Law (DOL).
10:46:57 AM
CHAIR EDGMON mentioned proposed legislation on an energy
efficiency loan program and asked whether the two bills
"overlap."
MS. JEANS said no, the bills will not jeopardize one another.
10:47:38 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH observed that installation labor costs can
amount to a large portion of the total cost of a project. He
asked how labor costs are handled through the loans.
10:48:36 AM
MR. WHISTLER agreed that installation, modification, and
fabrication can amount to 30-40 percent of costs. He advised
that HB 389 "would deal with just the equipment going in,
manufactured in the state for product quality improvement, it
would still qualify for the whole ... two points under prime
loan program. Those labor costs are inclusive."
10:49:19 AM
REPRESENTATIVE BUCH asked whether the cost of labor will be
separated in the application process.
10:49:50 AM
MR. WHISTLER stated the loan request asks for the total dollar
amount but, with the application, "quotes" are submitted that
break down each item.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER expressed his belief that the intent of
the bill is to provide an incentive to purchase products made in
Alaska, and he questioned whether the language in the bill was
sufficiently specific to fulfill the intent of the sponsor.
10:51:05 AM
CHAIR EDGMON stated that the bill would be held pending
responses to the questions posed, and for public testimony.
10:52:04 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 365-SE Revitalization Assn Ltr.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 365 |
| HB 389--Commercial Fishing Loan Fund Home Page.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 389 |
| HB 389--Committee Substitute LS1441 P 3.1.10.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 389 |
| HB 389--DCCED statistics for loan servicing.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 389 |
| HB 389--Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 389 |
| HB 389--CED-INV-3-12-10 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 389 |
| HB 246--Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 246 |
| HB 246--DFG-SFD-03-10-10 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 246 |
| HB 246--LICENSING BRIEF.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 246 |
| HB 246--Amendment 3 15 2010 H FISH.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 246 |
| HB 246--Amendment Rationale 3 15 2010 H FISH.pdf |
HFSH 3/16/2010 10:15:00 AM |
HB 246 |