Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/08/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB359 | |
| HB387 | |
| HB349 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 359 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 388 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 387 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE
March 8, 2024
1:08 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Tom McKay, Chair
Representative Kevin McCabe
Representative Dan Saddler
Representative Donna Mears
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative George Rauscher, Vice Chair
Representative Thomas Baker
Representative Stanley Wright
Representative Jennie Armstrong
Representative Maxine Dibert
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 359
"An Act relating to the permanent fund dividend and a one-
time permanent fund dividend payment and land voucher; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 387
"An Act relating to a tax credit for certain oil and gas
equipment in the Cook Inlet sedimentary basin; and
providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 349
"An Act relating to leases of public land for renewable
energy projects; and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 388
"An Act relating to state loans for oil and gas projects
in the Cook Inlet sedimentary basin; relating to the
Alaska Energy Authority; relating to the Alaska Industrial
Development and Export Authority; and providing for an
effective date."
- BILL HEARING CANCELED
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 359
SHORT TITLE: ONE-TIME PFD PAYMENT
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) CRONK
02/20/24 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/20/24 (H) RES, FIN
03/01/24 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
03/01/24 (H) Heard & Held
03/01/24 (H) MINUTE(RES)
03/08/24 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
BILL: HB 387
SHORT TITLE: OIL & GAS TAX CREDIT: JACK-UP RIG
SPONSOR(s): RESOURCES
02/26/24 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/26/24 (H) RES, FIN
03/06/24 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
03/06/24 (H) Heard & Held
03/06/24 (H) MINUTE(RES)
03/08/24 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
BILL: HB 349
SHORT TITLE: RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT LEASES
SPONSOR(s): GROH
02/20/24 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/20/24 (H) RES, ENE, FIN
03/08/24 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
JAMES SQUYRES, representing self
Deltana, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in opposition to HB 359.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CRONK
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, gave introductory
remarks and answered questions on HB 359.
DAVE STANCLIFF, Staff
Representative Mike Cronk
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions on HB 359, on
behalf of Representative Cronk, prime sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE CLIFF GROH
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, introduced HB 349
and co-presented a PowerPoint presentation.
CAMERON EBERSBOLD, Staff
Representative Cliff Groh
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Co-presented a PowerPoint
presentation on HB 349 on behalf of Representative Groh,
prime sponsor.
CHRISTY COLLES, Director
Division of Mining, Land, and Water
Department of Natural Resources
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions regarding HB 349.
MATTHEW PERKINS, CEO
Alaska Renewables
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Addressed concerns and answered
questions about renewable energy in Alaska during the
hearing on HB 349.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:08:42 PM
CHAIR MCKAY called the House Resources Standing Committee
meeting to order at 1:08 p.m. Representatives Mears,
McCabe, Saddler, and McKay were present at the call to
order.
HB 359-ONE-TIME PFD PAYMENT
1:09:49 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that the first order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 359, "An Act relating to the
permanent fund dividend and a one-time permanent fund
dividend payment and land voucher; and providing for an
effective date."
1:10:09 PM
CHAIR MCKAY opened public testimony on HB 359.
1:10:31 PM
JAMES SQUYRES, representing self, opined that the bill is
poorly thought out and needs to be sent back to the
drawing board. He compared the outcome of the bill's
provisions to a game of musical chairs where the last
participant will be left out, and future generations are
penalized. He discussed market value, prorations, the
earnings reserve, dedicated funds, and statutory
requirements.
1:13:27 PM
CHAIR MCKAY, after ascertaining that no one else wished to
testify, closed testimony on HB 359.
1:14:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CRONK, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, expressed appreciation for the questions
and the testimony on HB 359.
1:15:00 PM
DAVE STANCLIFF, Staff, Representative Mike Cronk, Alaska
State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Cronk,
prime sponsor, explained that the sponsor and staff were
working with Legislative Legal Services and the House
Resources Standing Committee on a number of issues such as
appropriations, remainder dividends, felons and
relocators, questions regarding Pick Click Give, jury
lists, eligibility for other programs, minors, and
"incapacitated" [individuals]. The sponsor and staff were
in discussion regarding people who come to Alaska for a
year and leave with a "wallet full of money." The
distribution could be over three or five years. He
referred to the work of Cody Rice in the Speaker's Office
and explained that Mr. Rice would be presenting to the
committee regarding the possibilities for metrics such as
a three-year or five-year distribution and the amount.
Questions regarding the land credit are being considered.
He said these matters would be thoroughly discussed before
the bill comes before the committee again.
1:16:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to Section 3, lines 5-8,
on page 2 of the bill and asked whether a person would
have to apply for a dividend every year after 2026 to
maintain their residency.
1:17:08 PM
MR. STANCLIFF acknowledged that was one of the issues they
are dealing with. He gave the example of a person who
cashed out, taking the dividend over a three- or five-year
period, and how that person would have to re-apply for the
dividend each year. He said it will be necessary to
resolve questions about programs that springboard off the
dividend language and dividend statistics.
1:17:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS pointed out that constituents are
raising many questions and requested that Legislative
Legal Services be on the line at future hearings to answer
those concerns.
1:18:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK stated that all questions and
comments are valuable and said his office will be working
to address those concerns.
1:18:55 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that HB 359 would be held over.
HB 387-OIL & GAS TAX CREDIT: JACK-UP RIG
1:19:05 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 387, "An Act relating to a tax
credit for certain oil and gas equipment in the Cook Inlet
sedimentary basin; and providing for an effective date."
1:19:19 PM
CHAIR MCKAY opened public testimony on HB 387. After
ascertaining there was no one who wished to testify, he
closed public testimony.
1:19:54 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced HB 387 would be held over.
HB 349-RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT LEASES
1:19:59 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 349, "An Act relating to leases of
public land for renewable energy projects; and providing
for an effective date."
1:20:17 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:20 p.m. to 1:24 p.m.
1:24:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLIFF GROH, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, explained the purpose of the bill was to
create more energy options for Alaska and aid investors to
bring more energy to Alaskans. It would create standards
for leasing of state land for renewable energy projects,
creating the same framework as for oil and gas projects.
In this way, there would be a level playing field for
investors. The state needs energy of all types including
oil and gas and renewables. He explained that Governor
Dunlevy has stated that Alaska needs a uniform framework
for all types of energy.
1:26:00 PM
CAMERON EBERSBOLD, Staff, Representative Cliff Groh,
Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Representative
Groh, prime sponsor, introduced the PowerPoint
presentation on HB 349 [hard copy included in the
committee packet], entitled, "HOUSE BILL 349, Leasing
State Land for Renewable Energy Projects, Representative
Cliff Groh, HD 18."
REPRESENTATIVE GROH brought attention to slide 2, which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
CURRENT PROBLEM
• Alaska has a looming energy shortage
• Alaska is largely dependent on a single energy
source
• We need to encourage all types of energy
development in our state
Renewable Energy projects are held to
different standards, discouraging investment
• Each project must be handled on a case-by-case
basis by the state
REPRESENTATIVE GROH reiterated and expanded on the points
summarized on slide 2, pointing out that renewable energy
is an additive approach. Currently, renewable energy
projects are handled differently than oil and gas
projects. The case-by-case basis discourages investors,
he said.
1:26:53 PM
MR. EBERSBOLD moved to slide 3, the sectional analysis for
HB 349, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section 1: AS 38.05.075(a) states the
commissioner of the department of natural
resources may, after a public auction or sealed
bid, enter the State into a lease agreement when
they have demonstrated there is a competitive
interest in the land and it is in state's best
interest. This section adds AS 38.05.084 to this
list of statutes that contain exceptions to
this.
Section 2: Amends AS 38.05 to add a new section
38.05.084, which:
(a) Enables the commissioner of natural
resources to lease state land for renewable
energy projects.
(b) Requires a person seeking this lease to
submit an application to the department
including the specifics of the parcel of land
they are seeking to lease, a detailed summary of
the proposal for the how the land will be used,
and additional information and requirements
established by department regulations.
(c) Requires the department to solicit
competitive interest by issuing public notice.
(d) Creates requirements for the department to
act if there are multiple applications for the
same piece of land.
(e) Creates an initial lease term of 10 years to
determine feasibility and research. Following
this 10-year period, the lease is valid for the
duration of commercial production of the
renewable energy project. 20 years after
commercial production begins and at 10-year
intervals after, the commissioner may
renegotiate the rentals and royalties due on the
renewable energy project lease.
(f) Requires the lessee to make progress toward
developing or maintenance of the leased land to
meet the renewable energy project purpose. The
commissioner may terminate the lease if
(1) The leased land is not being used for the
energy project,
(2) The lessee fails to meet the requirements of
the lease.
(g) Specifies that the lessee is not entitled to
a preference right to purchase the leased land.
(h) States that compensation for the lease:
(1) Shall maximize return to the state,
(2) Shall be separately accounted for,
(3) May be appropriated by the legislature
(i) States that the AS 38.05.070 and 38.05.095
concerning subleasing apply in this section.
(j) Requires the director, before entering into
the lease, to
(1) Evaluate information received during the
solicitation of the competitive bid and
(2) Find whether the proposal is in the best
interest of the state, including
(A) Reasonably foreseeable effects on the state
or local economy, including other resource
utilization,
(B) Anticipated revenue to the state from the
lease,
(C) Assessment of known mineral potential, Page
2
(D) Potential monetary value to the state
including other revenue to the state,
(E) A summary of public comments received.
(k) If practical, requires state land leased for
a renewable energy project to remain open for
(1) access to hunting, fishing and other allowed
public uses,
(2) resource development, including mining.
(l) So long as it does not interfere with the
renewable project, the state land must remain
open to mineral exploration and development.
(m) By February 1st of each year, the
commissioner must prepare a report on lease
agreements entered into and transmit that report
to each body of the legislature. The report must
contain
(1) The number of leases
(2) A complete list of lease information
including
(A) General description of the location of the
lease;
(B) The date the lease was executed;
(C) Identity of each person on the lease;
(D) A summary of the project;
(E) Current status of the project;
(F) A summery of the compensation for the lease
and an explanation of how that amount was
determined;
(G) The identity of each individual having an
ownership interest in an entity on the lease;
(3) A complete list of leases that expired or
were terminated during the current or preceding
fiscal year; and
(4) A description of the cumulative revenue
received by the state from leases in the current
year and previous year, and anticipated revenue
in the next fiscal year.
(n) The commission shall conduct research to
identify state land suitable for renewable
projects.
Section 3: Adds AS 38.05.084 to the exceptions
for lessee preference.
Section 4: Amends AS 38.05.945(a) to include the
new section of 38.05.84(c) in requiring notice
to be given by the department for the
solicitation of competitive interest.
Section 5: Amends uncodified law to so the
sections of AS 38.05.075(a), AS 38.05.084(b), AS
38.05.102 and AS 38.05.945(a) amended by the
bill apply to leases on or after the effective
date.
Section 6: Provides for an immediate effective
date.
1:31:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE referred to the sectional analysis
and asked for clarification regarding the words "if
practical" [in Section 2, subsection (k)].
REPRESENTATIVE GROH referred the question to Christy
Colles.
1:32:44 PM
CHRISTY COLLES, Director, Division of Mining, Land, and
Water, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), responded
with an example of the land around a wind tower possibly
needing to be closed to public use.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH added that the language would allow a
variety of uses that could be compatible on the same land.
1:34:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE followed up with a question about
slide 1, which read that Alaska is largely dependent on a
single source of energy. He asked what type of energy is
being referenced.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH responded that it was oil and gas.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE questioned whether coal or biomass
or other types of energy were included.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH reiterated that oil and gas have been
heavily used in Alaska for a long time but explained that
Alaska would need energy of all types, including renewable
energy ("renewables"), to deal with the energy problems.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked for a definition of
renewables.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH responded that there is a current
definition in Title 42, Public Utilities and Carriers and
Energy Programs. However, an amendment to the bill would
more completely define renewable energy resources under
Title 38, Public Lands.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE asked whether hydroelectric power is
considered one of the "single energy sources" or whether
it is a renewable.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH explained that under Title 42 [AS
42.45.045 (2)(A)], hydroelectric is referred to as a
renewable energy source and it would be included under the
new law.
1:36:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked Ms. Colles whether the
proposed legislation would create a level playing field
for renewables compared to oil and gas and whether the
leasing agreements would, in fact, be equitable.
MS. COLLES responded that she had not done a full analysis
yet. Notwithstanding that, she remarked that an initial
look seems to show that oil and gas licenses apparently
provide more "tools in their toolbox" for exploration.
1:38:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referenced a 10-year period for
renewable energy investors to do research and feasibility
studies and questioned whether oil and gas explorations
were given the same allowances. He also pointed to a
provision in the bill where in issuing the renewables
lease, the commissioner would evaluate some specific
details about the project which may not be available at
the "front end of the lease." He suggested it was not a
feasible provision.
1:39:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH finished his presentation with slide
5, "HB 349: An "All-Of-The Above" Approach To Energy,"
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
• Statutory certainty is attractive to private
investment
• More players in the market means more energy
and lower rates
• A uniform policy environment for renewables
and extractives enables market to allocate state
land to most productive type of energy
REPRESENTATIVE GROH explained that this legislation would
help move to a more stable framework for energy
development.
1:40:54 PM
MR. EBERSBOLD addressed questions from Representative
Saddler regarding the time requirements, explaining that
the goal was to identify sections of statutes elsewhere
that specified requirements and tried to replicate or find
applicable parallel structure for parity.
1:41:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked what "parity" means in this
instance.
1:41:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH responded that it would be a set of
statutes that would create an equal playing field to oil
and gas leasing on state lands. Currently, DNR makes
decisions for renewables applications on a case-by-case
basis when they get applications for leases for a new
energy project. The legislation would create a more
predictable framework, a structure under which investors
could operate and feel more confident in the leasing
process.
1:42:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER expressed concern about lessees
basically squatting on state lands for 10 years while
thinking about developing a project. He referred to
language in the bill which lacked the specificity to
create sideboards for lessees. He additionally questioned
whether the timelines equated to 10 years to think about
the project and 20 years to lease the land after the
project is developed.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH acknowledged that is a legitimate
concern.
1:44:03 PM
MR. EBERSBOLD directed the committee's attention to
Section 2, subsection (f) which outlines requirements the
lessee would have to fulfil. If they do not make progress
toward development or maintenance of the leased land, then
the commissioner would be able to terminate the lease.
This provision is similar to the oil and gas lease
requirements.
1:44:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE inquired about Section 2,
specifically the term "practical". He questioned what
types of activities would be compatible with renewables,
using the example of solar arrays. He then followed his
earlier line of questions regarding hydroelectric as a
renewable resource.
1:46:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH responded to the comments about
hunting and what was taken into consideration during the
development of the legislation. He explained the intent
was to accommodate various uses, referring specifically to
Representative McCabe's example of moose hunting near
solar arrays.
1:47:18 PM
MR. EBERSBOLD returned to Representative McCabe's
questions about hydroelectric power, explaining that
weighing the pros and cons of a specific project and how
it would interact with other uses would be better answered
by DNR.
1:47:54 PM
MS. COLLES responded to Representative McCabe's question
about generating hydroelectric power on leased state land.
She referred to factors that needed to be weighed when
making a decision regarding specific projects such as
public use, traditional use, and area use. All projects
are evaluated and go through a rigorous public process and
agency review before a decision is made. She pointed out
that those decisions are appealable.
1:48:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE commented that it was not clear in
the proposed legislation whether hydro would be considered
a renewable. Returning to the subject of solar energy, he
expressed concern regarding whether Lower 48 solar
companies would take farming land. He referred to best
use practices and the need to retain farming land for food
security. He suggested the best use concept needed to be
more specifically defined under the proposed legislation.
1:50:24 PM
MR. EBERSBOLD described how best use would be considered
in the application process. The availability of farmland
or other practical purposes is very much part of the
intent of HB 349.
1:51:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS commented that energy is a high
priority and pointed out that the committee has looked at
a number of bills that free up state land for a variety of
purposes. She referenced work being done in the Lower 48
exploring types of compatibility with agriculture and
solar farms.
1:51:59 PM
CHAIR MCKAY questioned the steps required in starting a
solar or wind farm. He then referenced how oil and gas
royalties go into the Alaska Permanent Fund and inquired
whether any part of the revenue stream of a wind or solar
farm would go into the fund.
1:53:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH responded that the state does get
revenues from renewable energy through corporate income
taxes.
1:53:43 PM
MR. EBERSBOLD explained his understanding of the section
of the Constitution of the State of Alaska that applies to
the fund which specifies royalties from mineral leases.
He pointed out that wind and solar energy would not fall
under the category of mineral leases.
1:54:13 PM
CHAIR MCKAY commented that wind and solar would not
apparently contribute to the fund. He then inquired about
how much employment a solar farm would provide after it is
up and running.
1:55:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH said there would be construction jobs
and operating jobs. He observed that there were a lot
more people who built the Trans-Alaska Pipeline than those
who operate it.
CHAIR MCKAY stated that Alaska does not have hazardous
disposal plants and that solar panels contain toxic
substances as do parts of wind towers and storage
batteries. He asked what happens to that equipment when
it wears out, who is going to pay for it, and whether
someone would be bonded so the public is protected from
worn out equipment being discarded and toxic materials
getting into the water and air.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH acknowledged Chair McKay's concerns
and said he would like to work with him on these issues.
1:58:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER expressed interest in the genesis
of HB 349, particularly the leasing requirements. He
asked whether any renewable projects have been denied
under the current statutes.
REPRESENTATIVE GROH responded that as a legislator, he has
been interested in doing what he could to help promote
energy development and economic activity in Alaska.
1:59:06 PM
MS. COLLES said the Division of Mining, Land, and Water
("the division") can currently issue authorizations for
renewable projects. She pointed out there are a number of
wind farms in Alaska on state land that were authorized
under the current leasing plan. However, some companies
do not feel they can invest in Alaska until the process
provides more surety as they are doing research on a
specific piece of land.
2:00:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH noted that the oil and gas industry
has a procedure called "DR&R," which stands for
"dismantle, remove, and restore," and the renewables would
have a similar process.
2:01:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER restated his earlier question about
whether any renewable project tried to lease state land
and was subsequently denied under current rules and
procedures outlined by state law.
2:01:41 PM
MS. COLLES was unaware of any company being denied a lease
based on the framework they were looking for.
2:01:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER directed the same question to the
sponsor of the bill, asking Representative Groh whether he
was aware of any company being denied a lease based on the
current statute.
2:02:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH responded that he was not aware of a
lease being denied under these circumstances. He deferred
this question to Mr. Perkins of Alaska Renewables.
2:02:57 PM
MATTHEW PERKINS, CEO, Alaska Renewables, responded to
Representative Saddler's question, explaining that under
the current process his company has not been denied the
entry authorizations and subsequent leases for three
separate assets they are pursuing with the department. He
noted that they were still in the process of working with
Director Colles and her team.
2:04:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GROH explained that Mr. Perkins is the CEO
of a company that is developing Little Mount Susitna and
Shovel Creek wind projects and is working on a third. He
asked Mr. Perkins for his thoughts regarding HB 349.
2:04:47 PM
MR. PERKINS provided some background regarding Alaska
Renewables. He explained that his company is an Alaska
based powerplant developer working with three of the four
Railbelt utilities to solve the energy security crisis.
The team has a background in coal, gas, solar, wind, and
energy storage over the past two decades. They are
specifically focused on what the capital market will
finance today according to three tenets: reliability,
constructability, and competitiveness. Alaska Renewables
is working with companies to engineer, finance and
construct the cheapest, most reliable power possible. He
referred to a recent Anchorage Daily News article
regarding an analysis by Chugach Electricity and third-
party engineers which showed that one of their projects,
the Little Mount Susitna Wind Farm, would have provided
twenty percent of South Central's energy needs during the
recent cold snap crisis. He explained that one of the
criticisms regarding renewables is the investment
structure is entirely different from oil and gas
investment. He encouraged the committee to focus less on
comparing these technologies.
2:06:59 PM
MR. PERKINS echoed the comments of Representative Groh
that regulatory certainty is critical for prudent
financial investing. He emphasized that the product his
company sells is an anti-volatility product. The upfront
cost is known. In addition, remediation and reclamation
is already in state statute that the leasehold must be
restored to a good and marketable condition within less
than a year after termination of the lease. Wind turbine
blades are highly recyclable, and one company is making
cement from recycled turbine blades although this is not
currently available in Alaska.
MR. PERKINS recommended language that allows a feasibility
lease to transfer a little more quickly to generation of
electricity. A ten-year period for research is
unnecessarily long. Regarding the topic of royalties, he
pointed out that electricity is not a product that is
exported out of Alaska. One hundred percent of the power
goes to not-for-profit electric cooperatives, so the
financial metric is to provide the lowest power cost
possible to Alaskans in addition to providing energy
security. Lastly, he explained that Alaska Renewables
already competitively bids for state assets, so the state
can make the best decision about the use of land. He
further emphasized the emerging business models that
combine agriculture on wind farms and agrivoltaics which
combine agriculture and solar energy generation. Finally,
an earlier effective date than that proposed under the
current bill would be advisable.
2:11:01 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that HB 349 was held over.
2:12:06 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the
House Resources Standing Committee meeting was adjourned
at 2:12 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB349.Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 3/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 349 |
| HB0349A.pdf |
HRES 3/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 349 |
| HB349.HRES.Sectional.pdf |
HRES 3/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 349 |
| HB349.HRES-Hearing Presentation.pdf |
HRES 3/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 349 |