Legislature(2001 - 2002)
05/06/2002 05:15 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CSHB 382(FIN)-CLEANUP OF ILLEGAL DRUG SITES
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced CSHB 382(FIN) to be up for
consideration.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved to adopt Amendment 1, which reads as
follows.
22-LS1105\S.2
Lauterbach
1/10/03
A M E N D M E N T 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE
TO: SCS CSHB 382( ), Draft Version "S"
Page 2, line 4, following "made.":
Insert "The owner of the property may appeal the
determination to the superior court for review of whether the
determination was made in compliance with this subsection. In
the appeal, the burden of proving by a preponderance of the
evidence that the determination was made in compliance with this
subsection is on the law enforcement agency that employed the
officer who made the determination."
Page 2, line 6:
Delete "by certified mail, return receipt requested,"
Insert "given in a manner that is consistent with the rules
of civil procedure for the service of process in a civil action
in this state"
Page 5, line 29:
Delete "or"
Page 6, line 2, following "met":
Insert "; or
(3) a court has held that the determination that
the property was an illegal drug manufacturing site was not
made in compliance with AS 46.03.500(a)"
Page 6, line 30:
Delete "a reasonably clear possibility"
Insert "reasonable cause to suspect the existence"
Page 7, line 3:
Delete "occurs"
Insert "has occurred"
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON objected to the motion for the purpose of
hearing an explanation.
REPRESENTATIVE GUESS, sponsor of HB 382, said Amendment 1 makes
her bill a much better one. The first part of the amendment sets
up an appeal process available to the residential owner if a drug
lab is determined to be an illegal lab site. It also makes the
notification process consistent with the civil procedure for
service so that a person can also be physically served with
certified mail. Language on page 6, line 2, states that the
property can be fit for use if the court determines that it was
not an illegal lab site. Finally, it changes the phrase, "a
reasonably clear possibility," which is language used in another
state, to "reasonable cause to suspect," a phrase used in this
state.
SENATOR TAYLOR called for the question. There were no further
objections and Amendment 1 was adopted.
CHAIRMAN TORGERSON referred to language on page 3, lines 16 and
17, "occupy the property at any time after the fourth day
following the day that the property was posted" and asked if
committee members were comfortable with the four day provision.
REPRESENTATIVE GUESS indicated that was okay.
SENATOR TAYLOR explained that the time frame was shorter in some
states and longer in others.
SENATOR WILKEN moved to report SCS CSHB 382(RES) from committee
with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. There
were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|