Legislature(2005 - 2006)BELTZ 211
04/27/2006 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Regulatory Commission of Alaska | |
| Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board | |
| HB122 | |
| HB389 | |
| HB409 | |
| HB377 | |
| HB150 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 409 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 389 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 377 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 150 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CSHB 377(L&C) am -EXEMPTION: RES. BLDG. DRAWINGS & SPECS
CHAIR CON BUNDE announced CSHB 377(L&C) am to be up for
consideration.
MIKE PAWLOWSKI, staff to Representative Kevin Meyer, sponsor of
HB 377, said that the people who the sponsor asked to testify on
this bill couldn't make it to today's meeting and they were
asked to submit their letters in writing. He advised that Colony
Builders submitted the letter that best summarized the issues.
MR. PAWLOWSKI summarized that the point is that state statute
conflicts with building code in its requirement of a design
professional. Building code says a two family home is up to
three stories; state statue says a four-family home is two
stories. In between those two definitions, home owners or people
building a home get saddled with extra costs for performing
residential seismic and wind design characteristics in a market
that is already tight for engineers and architects, who are
generally not all that interested because the job is too small.
HB 377 attempts to clean up that discrepancy between what
building codes ask for and what the state law says.
2:05:18 PM
He said the sponsor had worked back and forth with the Board of
Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors and they had come up
with an amendment for clarification.
2:05:54 PM at ease 2:06:12 PM
CHAIR BUNDE moved to adopt Amendment 1 and objected for an
explanation.
24-LS1471\FA.1
Bannister
A M E N D M E N T 1
OFFERED IN THE SENATE
TO: CSHB 377(L&C) am
Page 2, lines 23 - 24:
Delete all material.
Insert "is located in a municipality that has adopted a
building or residential code that applies to the building and if
the building complies with the building or residential code;"
MR. PAWLOWSKI explained that Amendment 1 clears up the fact that
the building must be located in a municipality that contains a
building code. Without the building code, the issues of public
safety are actually out there. If there is a building code and a
department to submit a plan to, all of the issues are covered by
the plan review process.
CHAIR BUNDE asked if someone wants to build on a remote site in
an unorganized area, would he need the architectural review.
MR. PAWLOWSKI replied yes - if the structure is up to three
stories - with an exception for owner-builders.
CHAIR BUNDE removed his objection and Amendment 1 was adopted.
No one else wanted to testify on this bill and public testimony
was closed.
2:07:37 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved to report SCS CSHB 377(L&C) am from
committee with individual recommendations and zero fiscal note.
Senators Ben Stevens, Davis, Seekins, Ellis and Chair Bunde
voted yea; so SCS CSHB 377(L&C) am moved from committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|