Legislature(2003 - 2004)
05/01/2004 04:14 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SJR 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SCR 25 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 379 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 366 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 490 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 309 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 351 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 405 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 373 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 373-STATE TREASURY WARRANTS
CHAIR GARY STEVENS announced HB 373 to be the final order of
business. He then called a brief at ease from 5:00 to 5:05 p.m.
TAPE 04-31, SIDE A
5:05 p.m.
REPRESENTATIVE MAX GRUENBERG, as a member of the House State
Affairs Committee, explained that HB 373 cures a long-standing
problem between commercial banks and the State of Alaska
relating to a policy the State had of dishonoring their own
warrants without any notification. The issue was litigated and
the Alaska Supreme Court held that state treasure warrants were
negotiable instruments under the Uniform Commercial Code and
were therefore subject to the "holder in due course" defense.
Although the State amended its business practices to comply with
the ruling, the statutes have never been amended.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked him to define the term negotiable
instrument.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said negotiable instrument means that
it's a piece of paper that says, "Pay somebody some thing."
According to the Uniform Commercial Code, the instrument must be
honored unless the drawer has gone through the specific and
formal process indicating that the instrument should be
dishonored. This protects the banking community and it protects
commerce, he said.
There were no questions.
SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS motioned to report HB 373 and attached
fiscal notes from committee with individual recommendations.
There being no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|