Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/06/2000 01:50 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 372
An Act relating to criminal sentencing and restitution.
Co-Chair Therriault MOVED to adopt Amendment #1. [Copy on
File]. The amendment would provide oversight to the Court
System and would exempt out arson if a person had been put
at risk. There being NO OBJECTION, it was adopted.
Co-Chair Therriault suggested that with current language,
the Court would be able to define what "community" is.
Representative J. Davies noted that he wanted to preclude
any argument over that concern by including a definition.
He reiterated that it is important that it is clarified.
Representative J. Davies MOVED a change to Page 1, Line 13,
adding, "In this section, community should be defined by the
Court."
REPRESENTATIVE FRED DYSON agreed that the Court would be
able to define who is a "community" which would allow both
sides, the perpetrator and the victim, the opportunity for
input regarding the definition of community. That action
would place the Court in the approving role.
Co-Chair Therriault asked if there would be an expense
incurred with the inclusion of "approved". Representative
J. Davies acknowledged that both sides would have to agree
to the process in order to move forward.
Discussion followed among Committee members regarding the
definition of what "community". there being NO further
OBJECTION, Amendment #2 was adopted.
Representative Foster MOVED to report CS HB 372 (FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CS HB 372 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with a fiscal note by Department of
Corrections dated 3/30/00.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|