Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/28/1998 09:15 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 370
"An Act making an appropriation for relief of the 1997
fishery disaster in Bristol Bay and on the Kuskokwim
River; and providing for an effective date."
Senator Pearce MOVED SCS CSHB 370(FIN) version "Q". Senator
Adams OBJECTED for discussion purposes. He felt it should
be explained how the funding mechanism would work, including
Federal funds and matching State general funds and how the
actual monies would get out to the fishermen and local
individuals.
Co-chair Sharp asked that Lamar Cotton, Deputy Commissioner,
Department of Community and Regional Affairs work closely
with the committee to insure correct structuring language in
the CS so they would be able to capture maximum Federal
dollars and to apply those dollars in areas most beneficial.
Representative Ivan Ivan was invited to join the committee.
He briefly said this bill was introduced as a result of the
disaster that occurred. He said the bottom line of his
intent was to get maximum Federal funds to the disaster
areas and affected individuals. He said that Mr. Cotton
could comment to concerns that had been brought up.
LAMAR COTTON, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Community
and Regional Affairs was invited to join the committee. He
said the key distinction, as noted by Representative Ivan,
was that there was no general fund in the bill. He said
this was to have been used as a match to trigger a release
of Federal funds. He said following discussions with Co-
chair Sharp and his staff, a way had been found to achieve
the goal of releasing the Federal funds. The method was
described in section three (1) and (2) of the bill. He
briefly explained that the funding source would be from
community or agency matching funds, goods and services that
were compliant with the requirements of the Magnussen and
Stevens Act. That meant, for example, the community grants
program would have to come up with some non-Federal funds,
which could also include capital matching grant funds. It
could also come from revenue sharing. The actual trick
would be to work closely with the Federal Department of
Commerce to insure the expenditures did comply with their
grant program.
Senator Phillips asked how many communities were affected.
Mr. Cotton said there were fifty-two communities total.
Senator Phillips further asked what were the mechanics for
the local communities to participate? Mr. Cotton said a
good example would be for a community to take a portion or
all of this year's or next year's capital matching program
and apply it for matching funds. They could also use
revenue sharing or municipal assistance. Further, another
State grant or raw fish tax could be used.
Representative Ivan said this plan was put together
enlisting the help of everyone. He also said there were
approximately fifty-two communities participating. In
response to a question from Senator Phillips he said he did
have commitments from all the communities. He felt the
relief set out in the bill would work.
Senator Torgerson asked about agency matching funds and was
the department anticipating changing any of their programs
to supplement funds for this relief? Mr. Cotton said the
department was not. Senator Torgerson asked if in acquiring
Federal funds this was an "all or none" deal as far as the
Federal funding was concerned? Mr. Cotton said he did not
know exactly. They were still in negotiation processes but
the Federal government had been fairly reasonable
considering the possible different mechanical changes.
Senator Torgerson commended the efforts of Representative
Ivan and Mr. Cotton in putting the bill together.
Co-chair Sharp said a lot of shopping had been done with the
departments and Mr. Cotton was the only one who had put in
so much effort. He noted the main concern was to capture
maximum Federal funds and put it out immediately to the
affected areas.
Senator Phillips asked if there was a deadline for community
contributions? Mr. Cotton said there had not been one set
because the desire to get the project underway will compel
many to move quickly.
JIM SANDERS, Supervisor, Southcentral Regional Office,
Division of Municipal and Regional Assistance, Department of
Community and Regional Affairs said he was available via
teleconference to assist Mr. Cotton in answering any of the
committee's questions.
Senator Torgerson noted that the CS had not been adopted and
therefore, notwithstanding the departure of Senator Adams,
WITHOUT OBJECTION the new CS was ADOPTED as a working
document before the committee.
Senator Torgerson MOVED SCS CSHB 370(FIN) and WITHOUT
OBJECTION it was REPORTED OUT with individual
recommendations and no accompanying fiscal notes.
There followed a brief at ease at approximately 9:45 a.m.
Co-chair Sharp called SB 350.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|