Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/30/2002 03:08 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 370
"An Act relating to the issuance of state-guaranteed
revenue bonds by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
to finance mortgages for qualifying veterans; and
providing for an effective date."
JOHN BITNEY, LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE
CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, spoke in support of the
legislation. He explained that the legislation would provide
authorization on the general election ballot for $500
million dollars in mortgage-backed, guaranteed revenue bonds
through the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC).
Alaska is one of five states that are able to take advantage
of these tax-exempt bonds. The requirement for the state to
capture the tax exemption is that the bonds must have an
unconditional guarantee by the state in which the program is
administered. The state Constitution requires that a
guarantee of that nature have a vote of the people. The
bonds are structured to only relate to the mortgages that
the bond proceeds are used to purchase. The state's general
obligation capacity would not be affected. Congress
authorized the tax exemption in 1978 and 1979. Alaska was
one of five states that issued bonds when the program was
first made available. Congress subsequently closed the
window in the early 1980's; those states that were in the
program were grandfathered. The bond proceeds would be used
to fund the Veterans Mortgage Program. To qualify, veterans
would have to have been in active duty service prior to
January 1, 1977 and not been discharged more than 30 years
prior to the application date of their loan. There would be
a diminishing pool of qualified veterans. This would be the
fifth and last time that AHFC would anticipate coming before
the legislature for this type of bond authorization. He
pointed out that the bonds are well supported by the general
public.
Co-Chair Mulder questioned what would happen if the ballot
issue did not pass. Mr. Bitney explained that AHFC would
finish with the authorization from 1986, which is close to
$50 million dollars; this would allow them to finish out the
year.
Co-Chair Mulder questioned if they would need to be on a
statewide general election or could they be on a primary
election. Mr. Bitney did not know.
Co-Chair Mulder stressed that too many questions on the
ballot may lead to the downfall of one of the questions and
suggested that it may behooved the legislation to be on the
primary ballot. Mr. Bitney clarified that the authorization
is needed in the current year.
In response to a question by Representative Lancaster, Mr.
Bitney observed that there is a generous cap. He did not
think that all of the authorization beyond the 30-year
timeframe would be needed. There are bills pending in
Congress, which could require additional authorization if
passed.
Co-Chair Mulder stressed that the ballot issue should be on
the primary election where it would not be confused with any
other ballot question.
Representative Foster MOVED to report HB 370 out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 370 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with two previously published fiscal
notes: REV #1 and GOV #2.
RECESSED:
The Committee Recessed at 4:00 p.m.
TAPE HFC 02 - 99, Side A
RECONVENED:
The Committee Reconvened at 4:45 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|