Legislature(2011 - 2012)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/12/2012 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB302 | |
| HB366 | |
| HCR23 | |
| HB21 | |
| HB115 | |
| HB360 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 302 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 366 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HCR 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 360 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 366
"An Act establishing an Alaska intrastate mutual aid
system and relating to the duties of the Alaska
division of homeland security and emergency management
and the duties of the Alaska State Emergency Response
Commission."
9:10:45 AM
MICHAEL PASCHALL, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE ERIC FEIGE,
disclosed that Representative Feige was the Chief of the
Chickaloon Volunteer Fire Department. He added that he was
the Assistant Chief and board member of the Rural Deltana
Volunteer Fire Department and that he chaired the
Delta/Greely Local Emergency Planning Committee. He
furthered that he was a member of the State Inoperable
Communications Committee; all of the mentioned organizations
could be related to the legislation.
9:11:38 AM
Mr. Paschall explained that according to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mutual aid agreements and
systems agreements were agreements between agencies,
organizations, and jurisdictions that provided a mechanism
to quickly obtain emergency assistance in the form of
personnel equipment materials and other associated services.
The primary objective was to facilitate rapid, short-term
deployment of emergency support prior to, during, and after
an incident. He stated that through the Emergency Management
Assistance Compact (EMAC), all 50 states, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands had
an agreement that established guidelines across state
borders. He referred to the Sponsor Statement (copy on
file):
In 2004 the National Emergency Management Association
(NEMA) in conjunction with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and a host of emergency
response organizations, began developing and promoting
model legislation for an intrastate mutual aid system
(IMAS). The goal of IMAS is to provide a framework for
all political subdivisions within a state to receive
and render aid to other subdivisions within a state in
times of need.
HB 366 will implement this model legislation in a
manner that will be beneficial for Alaskan communities.
The system detailed in HB 366 will provide a framework
for mutual assistance among the participating political
subdivisions - regions, boroughs, municipalities, and
other local jurisdictions - in the prevention of,
response to, and recovery from any disaster that
results in a formal declaration of local disaster
emergency.
The employees and volunteers who serve in emergency
services recognize that emergencies transcend political
jurisdictional boundaries. They, and the local agencies
they serve, understand that intergovernmental
coordination is essential for the protection of lives
and property and for best use of available assets.
Currently, the Alaska Disaster Act does provide for
political subdivisions to create mutual aid agreements,
which, in practice, works well for neighboring entities
or service areas that have an established history of
providing mutual aid to one another. These local mutual
aid agreements vary widely in their scope and may not
all address key issues of liability and compensation.
Further, they may not encompass all emergency services.
Through HB 366, a statewide agreement would be
developed to supplement existing regional or local
agreements by establishing a comprehensive, integrated
system of mutual aid at a state level that will ensure
an efficient and effective response to all hazards and
disasters.
HB 366 would allow all political subdivisions to
automatically be included in the statewide mutual aid
system. A political subdivision may elect to withdraw
by enacting an appropriate resolution by its governing
body. This legislation would not prevent participating
entities from entering into supplementary agreements
with other political subdivisions or impact any
existing or future agreements. If a participating
entity cannot provide assistance to a requesting
entity, they are not obligated or bound to provide
assistance.
9:14:35 AM
Senator Thomas wondered if HB 366 participation in the
system was mandatory.
Mr. Paschall replied that the way the law was written all
political sub-divisions, which would include communities in
the state, were a part of the agreement. He added that any
community or municipality could vote to opt out of the
agreement. He noted that no one was required to participate
in the event of an emergency. He stressed that the bill
simply provided the mechanism for understanding where the
liability lands during an emergency situation.
9:16:20 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman noted the one previously published zero
fiscal note from the Department of Military and Veterans
Affairs.
Co-Chair Hoffman OPENED public testimony.
9:16:51 AM
BRYAN FISHER, CHIEF OF OPERATIONS, ALASKA DIVISION OF
HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF
MILITARY and VETERANS AFFAIRS, FORT RICHARDSON, ANCHORAGE,
(via teleconference), testified in support of HB 366. He
stated that interstate mutual aid was his agencies mission
and the standing mission of the State Emergency Response
Commission. He noted that his agency provided the direct
staff support to the commission already, hence the zero
fiscal note.
9:17:58 AM
DAVID GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS, FAIRBANKS
NORTH STAR BOROUGH (via teleconference), spoke in support of
HB 366. He added that interstate mutual aid legislation was
a legislative priority for the borough in 2010.He believed
that the bill was well crafted policy that provided a
framework for a consistent and integrated mutual aid system.
He shared that the myriad of issues with regard to
authorities, compensation, and liability affected the
ability to provide, and receive, timely assistance in times
of disaster.
9:19:05 AM
RICHARD ETHERIDGE, SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT, ALASKA FIRE CHIEFS
ASSOCIATION, JUNEAU, urged support for HB 366. He opined
that there currently were delays in responding to disasters
in outlaying communities. He felt that the bill would
streamline operations to provide for faster response.
Co-Chair Hoffman CLOSED public testimony.
HB 366 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSHB 21- Explanation of Changes.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| CSHB 21- Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| CSHB 21- Letter of Support- Douglas.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| CSHB 21- Letter of Support- SSPC.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| HB 21 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| CSHB 115(TRA) Explanation of Changes.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| CSHB 115(TRA) Google Map.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| CSHB 115(TRA) Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |
| CSHB 115(TRA) Support.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 115 |