Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
03/26/2014 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB250 | |
| HB362 | |
| HB315 | |
| SB64 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 362 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 64 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 315 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 250 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 362-SYNTHETIC DRUGS
1:26:17 PM
CHAIR KELLER announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 362, "An Act relating to a prohibition on the
offer, display, marketing, advertising for sale, or sale of
illicit synthetic drugs."
1:27:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MAX GRUENBERG moved to adopt HB 362, labeled
28LS1538\U, Strasbaugh, 3/18/14, as a working document.
CHAIR KELLER objected for discussion purposes.
1:28:44 PM
EDRA MORLEDGE, Staff, Senator Kevin Meyer, Alaska State
Legislature, said that Senator Meyer is carrying the Senate
Version (SB 173). She noted that he has previously sponsored
legislation to outlaw synthetic cannabinoids, and the bills have
passed. The cannabinoids go by various names, such as spice and
bath salt, and they are commonly used as alternatives to cocaine
and marijuana. The substance is sold by the gram in small
packets in convenience stores and smoke shops, and it is easily
accessible, she explained. Unfortunately, many people think
these drugs are safe, including parents, because they are so
readily available. "They're actually not safe; they cause many
psychotropic effects on users," she stated. The bill is an
attempt to stop the sale of these drugs by targeting the way
they are packaged, rather than the chemical compounds they are
made of. "What happens is, the manufacturers of these drugs,
who are often overseas, simply change the compounds that we
previously outlawed by a molecule or two, and all of a sudden,
they're not illegal anymore," she explained.
MS. MORLEDGE said that the Anchorage Assembly passed an
ordinance to ban the packaging of synthetic cannabinoids, and
the House and Senate bills are modeled after that ordinance, as
it has been very successful. "They virtually wiped it out of
all of the smokes shops and convenience stores," she stated.
She surmised that Alaska is the only state attempting this
approach-to target the packaging rather than the compound-and
"it hasn't really been challenged as ... a state law." She
noted that a similar ordinance was passed in Maine and there
have been no challenges.
1:31:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GABRIELLE LEDOUX asked if [the label] has to
include some or all of the following criteria: false and
misleading; does not specify the name of the synthetic drug;
does not specify the name and place of the manufacturer, packer,
or distributer; and all of [the criteria listed under paragraph
(2)].
1:32:11 PM
MS. MORLEDGE noted that her understanding is that the substance
would have to meet one criterion from [paragraph] (b)(1) and one
from [paragraph] (b)(2).
1:32:31 PM
KATHLEEN STRASBOUGH, Attorney, Legislative Legal Counsel,
Legislative Legal and Research Services, Legislative Affairs
Agency, said, yes, [the package] would have to have one from
(b)(1) and one from (b)(2).
1:32:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX suggested that the manufacturer could
simply put the ingredients on the label in order to be legal.
MS. STRASBOUGH she said does not have all of the facts
associated with the bill, but those who trade in these products
do not like the scrutiny and do not want to provide that
information.
1:33:45 PM
MS. MORLEDGE said the items are being marketed as things that
they are not, like incense. The packaging often states, "Not
for human consumption," but that is exactly what it is intended
for, she explained. She suggested that the Anchorage city
prosecutor answer the question.
CHAIR KELLER asked if instant coffee, a stimulant, could fall
under this prohibition.
1:35:34 PM
MS. STRASBOUGH said this bill depends upon mislabeling; a person
selling coffee would likely not want to disguise it. There is
another law, Imitation Controlled Substance, where something
like that might occur, but the element of falsity is necessary
for a violation to be committed under HB 362, she explained.
CHAIR KELLER assumed [instant coffee could fall under the
statute].
1:36:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he agrees with Chair Keller and
also with Representative LeDoux. He turned to page 1, line 11,
where the intent is correctly drafted because the item must have
(A), (B), or (C), and "or" is the key word [under (b)(1)].
However, "and" appears on page 1, line 13, but there only needs
to be one of (A) through (G) under [(b)(2)]. The word "or" does
not appear at the end of line 18, like it appears at the end of
line 11. He said he will offer an amendment at the appropriate
time to ensure that it requires only one criterion from [(b)(2)]
by inserting the word "or".
1:38:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if his suggestion is correct.
CHAIR KELLER stated that that can be worked out with the
sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said it is not clear to him whether
each sale would be a separate violation. "If you sold 10 of
these packages to one person and three to another, you would
have committed 13 separate offenses?"
1:39:21 PM
MS. MORLEDGE answered that the intent is a $500 violation per
package.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he will offer an amendment that
specifies that intent. He then said he is concerned about the
question that Chair Keller raised. "We have things that are
depending upon having street names," and those names vary, so
how can it withstand a test for vagueness? "I see this thing
not being challenged as a whole bill but in an individual case
where they have something from category A and something from
category B, and I see one thing is legal, and somebody will say
'well, I bought a legal drug.'"
1:40:57 PM
MS. MORLEDGE said the sponsor will be happy to work with
Representative Gruenberg on refining the bill's language.
REPRESENTATIVE BOB LYNN noted page 2, line 19, where the
esoteric names [of the product] are listed. "What happens if
somebody comes up with a new name that is not included in this
list?"
1:41:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG answered that the law would have to be
amended.
MS. MORLEDGE said the names are included now because they are
known; perhaps when the names change, the list can be deleted.
These are drugs that we would like off of the street
immediately, she stated.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN asked if there was language that would
include future street names.
MS. MORLEDGE said, "We would be happy to work on that."
1:42:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CHARISSE MILLETT said she is willing to work with
both Representatives Gruenberg and Lynn. "It is an ever-
changing group of names, and that's what we struggle with. And
it's an ever-changing group of drugs that are mixed in with
these," she noted. It is difficult to capture everything, but
she wants to make sure kids do not have access to the drugs and
people do not sell them. She reiterated that she will work with
anyone to make the bill better.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked about a definition of "false and
misleading."
1:43:39 PM
MS. STRASBOUGH said those terms are in frequent use in the
statutes. "I'm sure that a definition can be put together if
someone wanted one," she added.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked if it is defined.
MS. STRASBOUGH said she has not researched it, but it is her
impression that the statute uses the term without definition.
1:44:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX said she is looking forward to an answer
on why a person [selling the substance] would not just specify
what is in the package and who manufactured it in order to make
it legal.
VASILIOS GIALOPSOS, Staff, Representative Charisse Millett,
Alaska State Legislature, said that the overwhelming majority of
these synthetic substances comes from China. In order for them
to enter the United States under those pretenses, the substances
would have to comply with the federal Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and they would not be able to do so.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked why the substances would not be able
to meet the FDA requirements. If it cannot meet those
requirements, why is it not illegal?
MR. GIALOPSOS said that was an excellent question that he would
not be answering at this point.
1:46:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG noted that page 3, line 17, states that
the commissioner of the Department of Public Safety may delegate
its authority as appropriate. He asked if that phrase is
normally used, because it does not specify any outer limits of
what may be delegated. It could be unconstitutional, he added.
He then noted that the language does not specify who the
authority can be delegated to; it could be to a non-governmental
agency, and he sees potential problems.
1:48:17 PM
GUS SANDAHL, Kenai, Alaska, said he works in law enforcement,
and he is very supportive of legislation that prohibits the sale
and possession of these substances across all of Alaska. He
appreciates the time taken to eliminate loopholes and for
considering the bill.
CHAIR KELLER said he agreed and complimented the sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he had two more questions.
Regarding the section with the penalties, page 3, lines 21-22, a
person who violates the law is guilty of a violation. "Are you
intending to punish the person who makes the drugs, who
wholesales them, who retails it, or all three?" He then
referred to page 3, line 30, [defining a synthetic drug] as a
chemical intended to.... He asked who would have to have the
intent, "and how are you going to prove it?" He said he
supports the concept [of the bill], but he is trying to save it
from potential serious challenges.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX surmised that a violation is a civil
matter, rather than a criminal matter. "If it's civil, you're
not entitled to a public defender; you're not entitled to a
trial by jury; is that the reason for making it a violation as
opposed to a misdemeanor?"
CHAIR KELLER said that question will be answered later, and HB
362 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 2. HB 315 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| 3. HB 315 Ver U.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB 315 Fiscal Note~LAW.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB 315 Fiscal Note~OPA.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| HB 315 Fiscal Note~PDA.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| 5. HB 315 Legal Opinion re NH 2-26-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| 4. HB 315 Legal Opinion 2-18-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| 6. HB 315 Supporting Documents State Language on Jury Nullification.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| 7. HB 315 Supporting Document HB 140.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| 8. HB 315 Supporting Document HB 463.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 HB 463 |
| HB 362-Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362-Version U.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Fiscal Note~DHSS.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Fiscal Note~OPA.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Fiscal Note~Public Defender Agency.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Fiscal Note~Public Safety.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB362 Fiscal Note~Court System.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362-Legal Memo.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362-ADN Article 2-4-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362-ADN Article 12-18-13.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362-ADN Article-1-22-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362-Alaska Dispatch Article 1-10-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362-Anchorage Ordinance.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB362-ADN Article 2-8-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 250 ver. P Proposed Amendments.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 250 |
| SB 64 Letter~Betty Bair.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 Support Letter~Jayce Robertson.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 Memo Addressing Questions from House Judiciary 3-26-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| HB 315 Support Letter~Lance Roberts.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 315 |
| CSHB 362 Summary of Changes ver. U.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Support Document~ADN Article 3-25-14.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Fiscal Note~Revised OPA.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Fiscal Note~Revised PDA.pdf |
HJUD 3/26/2014 1:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |