Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205
05/13/2024 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB358 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 358 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 358-DEEPFAKES: LIABILITY; ELECTIONS 1:34:02 PM CHAIR CLAMAN announced the consideration of CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 358(2d JUD) "An Act relating to defamation claims based on the use of deepfakes; and relating to the use of deepfakes in electioneering communications." [This is the second hearing of HB 358 in the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.] The intent is to consider a proposed Senate committee substitute (SCS). He invited Ms. Kakaruk to present the summary of changes. 1:34:34 PM BREANNA KAKARUK, Staff, Senator Matt Claman, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, presented the summary of changes from version D to version H for HB 358: [Original punctuation provided.] Summary of Changes Senate Judiciary Committee: Version D to Version H In the Committee Substitute to HB 358, the following changes were made: Page 2, line 12 • Reformat (d) and following subsections Page 2, line 29 following "pitch" • Insert "and at a speed" Page 2, line [31] • Insert "(2) the synthetic media constitutes satire or parody." Multiple sections • Delete "deepfake" • Insert "synthetic media" Page 4, lines 4 • Delete all material related to the definition of "deepfake" (version D page 3, lines 14-21) • Insert "(3) "synthetic media" (A) means an image, audio recording, or video recording of an individual's appearance, speech, or conduct that is manipulated by artificial intelligence or in a manner that creates a realistic but false image, audio recording, or video recording and produces (i) a depiction that a reasonable person would believe is of a real individual in appearance, speech, or conduct but did not actually occur in reality; and (ii) a materially different understanding or impression than a reasonable person would have from the unaltered, original version of the image, audio recording, or video recording; (B) does not include an image, audio recording, or video recording that is minimally edited, adjusted, or enhanced by artificial intelligence without materially altering how the meaning or significance of the depiction would be perceived by a reasonable person;" Page 4, line 15 • Insert "(B) does not include visual or audio media that is minimally edited, adjusted, or enhanced by artificial intelligence without materially altering how the meaning or significance of media would be perceived by a reasonable person" Page 4, line 19 • Insert "* Sec. 3. This Act takes effect immediately under AS 01.10.070(c)." Conforming changes: • Title change • Renumbering 1:36:40 PM SENATOR TOBIN corrected a line number in the summary of changes for the following text in subsection (d): Page 2, line 31: Insert "(2) the synthetic media constitutes satire or parody." 1:37:11 PM MS. KAKARUK expressed appreciation for the recommendation and said that she will correct the line number to "31" in the summary of changes. 1:37:21 PM CHAIR CLAMAN reminded members that the SCS changed the deepfake verbiage to synthetic media in the bill. 1:37:32 PM CHAIR CLAMAN solicited a motion. 1:37:36 PM SENATOR KIEHL moved to adopt the Senate committee substitute (SCS) for CSHB 358, work order 33-LS1272\H, as the working document. 1:37:54 PM CHAIR CLAMAN found no objection and SCS CSHB 358 was adopted as the working document. He invited the bill sponsor's staff to make a closing statement. 1:38:15 PM DAVE STANCLIFF, Staff, Representative Mike Cronk, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, indicated the bill sponsor had reviewed the SCS. He said there was discussion about: - the term "deepfakes" trivializing the seriousness of the bill. He stated that "synthetic media" is a more accurate and appropriate term. - the paragraph regarding satire and parody. He expressed confidence that the paragraph gives the Court System latitude to resolve such matters. He explained that, in his experience, legislation that is overly rigid or constructed for a guaranteed court outcome often fails. MR. STANCLIFF expressed gratitude for the committee's work on HB 358 and for doing it expeditiously. 1:39:33 PM SENATOR KAUFMAN inquired about the scope of liability under this legislation and the extent of activities the bill would encompass. He gave the example of a campaign mailer featuring a photo with a noisy background that required cleanup. He wondered whether HB 358 casts such a wide net that a person could be liable for cleaning up the background. He asked whether individuals could unintentionally violate the law under the definitions in HB 358 by making similarly common alterations for use in a mailer or electronic media. 1:41:00 PM MR. STANCLIFF replied that this would be part of the determination if the courts were presented with a case. He said the courts would have to make a judgment on the matter. He reiterated that being too specific can create problems related to freedom of speech, but at the same time, the issue arises regarding the purpose and intent of the act, including whether it was: - meant to be funny or a joke; - intended to seriously damage a person's image to the extent that they lose a political campaign; or - meant to cause other harm. MR. STANCLIFF agreed that HB 358 is not far from casting a wide net, but emphasized the courts would ultimately need to make those determinations. 1:41:56 PM CHAIR CLAMAN clarified that HB 358 only addresses defamation claims, defamatory material published about someone else. He stated that material a candidate posts about themself would not form the basis of a defamation claim. 1:42:57 PM SENATOR KAUFMAN explained that a past opponent depicted him in a very nice, three-piece black suit, which he did not own. The photo showed him throwing money around wildly to suggest he was irrational with spending. He stated the photo was wildly inaccurate. He asked whether HB 358 would provide standing to claim damages if he lost based on: - being depicted in a suit he never wore or owned, and - handing out state money he never would have, given his very responsible nature. CHAIR CLAMAN directed the question to Mr. Stancliff and said he would follow-up on it afterward. MR. STANCLIFF replied that he had a 50 / 50 chance. SENATOR KAUFMAN commented this was just food for thought. 1:44:32 PM CHAIR CLAMAN answered the question, stating the bill would probably provide the standing needed to bring such a claim. He noted that part of the issue would involve demonstrating that the opponent's intent was to misrepresent him. The focus would likely be more on the depiction of throwing money around than on the black suit. CHAIR CLAMAN said that given the economic earning potential in the oil industry compared to the legislature, it might be difficult to argue that losing the election resulted in economic damages. 1:45:24 PM SENATOR KAUFMAN conceded that the economic point was fair enough; however, he brought up the reputational damage that the photo could have caused by depicting him as a spendthrift. 1:45:38 PM SENATOR TOBIN said that, to avoid this dynamic, Senator Kaufman's opponent would simply need to include a disclosure on the image that is visible, easily readable, and printed in a font no smaller than any other text in the visual component. She noted that this protects everyone and is an important aspect of HB 358. She expressed hope that individuals would take heed, and that Alaskans remain honest and clear in their communications. She stated that Alaskans should neither engage in nefarious activities nor defame their political opponents and that such behavior does not belong in Alaska's political system. SENATOR KAUFMAN agreed. 1:46:21 PM CHAIR CLAMAN shared an anecdotal story about a constituent. He said he once asked a well-known Anchorage satire-parody comedian why he never endorsed political candidates in radio or television commercials. The comedian explained that he ran a satire and parody show, and he needed to be able to make fun of all candidates regardless of party lest Anchorage residents assume the Fly by Night Club advocates on behalf of certain candidates. That is why he never did campaign advertising for anyone. He said this touches on the issue of satire and parody in the bill. 1:47:16 PM SENATOR KIEHL circled back to a conversation from the first hearing on HB 358, specifically regarding falsifying conduct. He said that he had presented some hypotheticals, to which the presenters explained the intent of HB 358. They stated the purpose of the bill is to address false representations of physical conduct, such as depicting someone engaging in criminal, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate behavior. SENATOR KIEHL said that after thinking it through, he concluded that interpreting the meaning of someones conduct is likely protected speech. Therefore, it would not fall within the scope of HB 358, which primarily addresses overt deception. He acknowledged that his interpretation of those provisions had evolved, and he said the provisions themselves would remain unchanged. 1:48:33 PM CHAIR CLAMAN solicited the will of the committee. 1:48:38 PM SENATOR KIEHL moved to report SCS CSHB 358, work order 33- LS1272\H, from committee with individual recommendations and attached zero fiscal note(s). 1:49:00 PM CHAIR CLAMAN found no objection and SCS CSHB 358(JUD) was reported from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee. CHAIR CLAMAN said that this is probably the last Senate Judiciary Standing Committee meeting for the year and thanked members of the committee for their diligent work.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 358 version H 5.13.2024.pdf |
SJUD 5/13/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 358 |
HB 358 Summary of Changes Version D to Version H.pdf |
SJUD 5/13/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 358 |