Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 106
04/10/2014 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB162 | |
| HB356 | |
| HB380 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 356 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 380 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 162 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 356-ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WELLNESS
3:19:02 PM
CHAIR HIGGINS announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 356, "An Act establishing the Advisory Committee
on Wellness; and relating to the administration of state group
health insurance policies."
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON explained, as the sponsor of the proposed
bill, that HB 356 would establish an advisory committee on
wellness within the Department of Administration (DOA), and said
that the purpose was to implement a prevention of disease model
for health care. He stated that Sections 2 and 3 were the
impetus of the bill which asked that the DOA, as determiners of
the health care policy through the insurance provided, include a
wellness advisory committee. He explained that this committee
would have at least seven members, and he relayed that 90 people
had applied for appointment to an earlier wellness advisory
committee. He stated that there was a lot of interest in the
population to promote wellness. He reported that this proposed
committee would have the power to require the submitted
recommendations be addressed, similar to the Office of
Children's Services (OCS) advisory committee. He shared that
DOA did not have opposition to the proposed bill, as its goal
was to control the escalation of health care costs. He pointed
out that $3.8 billion of unfunded liability was caused by the
escalation of health care costs above the original long term
estimate for an annual cost increase of 2 percent. He directed
attention to the handout [Included in members' packets] for a
proposed initiative to save up to $10 million annually. He
spoke about Vitamin D, nutritional guidelines, and wellness in
the work place initiatives. He explained that the wellness
committee would work on proscriptive solutions for a voluntary
means to reduce disease in workers and the retired population.
He lauded the benefit of a wellness committee with the power to
solicit a response. He pointed out that this was also defined
as practical and reasonable suggestions for solutions to hold
down health care escalation costs. He reported that the
committee could meet via teleconference, as the proposed bill
had a zero fiscal note.
CHAIR HIGGINS questioned the accomplishments of the multitude of
committees, and asked about the need for another committee. He
directed attention to the current [Alaska] Health Care
Commission, which reviewed all of the State of Alaska. He noted
that a committee on controlled substances, formed more than 32
years previously, had never met.
3:26:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON replied that the Alaska Health Care
Commission was under the Department of Health and Social
Services (DHSS), and reviewed a different spectrum than this
proposed committee would under the DOA, which administered
health policies and negotiated contracts with state workers. He
pointed out that there had been a voluntary wellness committee,
however its focus had not been for prevention of disease and
there had not been any requirement for response to its
suggestions.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER respectfully pointed out that, although
the Alaska Health Care Commission did not solely dwell on
prevention, it did focus on ways to reduce health care costs
with prevention as a top priority. He declared his support for
the proposed bill. He shared that he had long been involved
with prevention groups, and he reported that many people were
working on prevention related to smoking, obesity, and chronic
disease. He expressed his discomfort with an indictment that
committees had not reduced the cost of health care, noting the
difficulty for documentation. Directing attention to page 1,
line 9, he questioned the intent language, "the state has not
adequately focused state policy on avoiding disease," and stated
that it did not mean that many people were not trying. He noted
that the smoking cessation program had required a lot of work.
He asked that respect be shown toward those people currently
working on prevention programs.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON replied that the proposed bill focused on
the DOA, and that he did not intend to impugn any other work on
wellness and prevention. He declared a need to focus on the
budgetary situation, and getting wellness programs initiated
with state workers and their dependents. He pointed out that
the current Wellness committee had not met since December. He
explained that the proposed bill required responses to its
recommendations, similar to the authority of the Citizens Review
Panel with the Office of Children's Services (OCS). He said
that he did not want to denigrate other work, and this proposed
bill was for wellness programs through DOA, as insurance and the
subsequent health care inflation were housed there.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER acknowledged the other various wellness
committees.
REPRESENTATIVE NAGEAK asked if Department of Health and Social
Services (DHSS) would increase its education for prevention, in
lieu of the creation of another committee.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON replied that DHSS had its own mission, and
its ways for working on change in the state, which was different
than DOA, which oversees the health care insurance policies. He
offered his belief that it was necessary to reduce the increases
to health insurance. He relayed that incentives to place
wellness programs, such as co-pays and deductibles, could be
offered through the health care contracts.
CHAIR HIGGINS asked for clarification that the wellness
committee would target the insurance policies.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON said that the proposed bill would target
insurance for the active workforce employees, retirees, and
dependents in the State of Alaska for reductions in liabilities.
CHAIR HIGGINS asked for an explanation to the zero fiscal note.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON replied that DOA had stated that a
wellness committee was advisable and, as it was a non-paid
position, there would be volunteer members who would attend
telephonic meetings. He opined that, if successful, it could
have huge benefits toward reducing the state budget.
3:38:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to report HB 356, Version 28-
LS1465\C, out of committee with individual recommendations and
the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, HB 356
was moved from the House Health and Social Services Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 380 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 380 |
| HB 380.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 380 |
| HB0356A.pdf |
HHSS 3/20/2014 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB 356 Wellness Presentation.pdf |
HHSS 3/20/2014 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB 356 Background Materials.pdf |
HHSS 3/20/2014 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB 356 Presentation 3 20 2014.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB 356 Background Material.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB 356 Mayo Clinic vitamin D for health a global perspective.pdf |
HHSS 3/20/2014 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB356 Support KPBSD.pdf |
HHSS 3/20/2014 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB356-DOA-DRB-03-14-14.pdf |
HHSS 3/20/2014 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB 356 sponsor statement.pdf |
HHSS 3/20/2014 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB380-DHSS-WIC-04-09-14.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 380 |
| HB 380 Research.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 380 |
| HB 380 Research.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 380 |
| HB 356 Cost Savings per year with vitamin D.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 356 |
| HB 380 Letter of Support.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 380 |
| HB 380 Letter of Support.pdf |
HHSS 4/10/2014 3:00:00 PM |
HB 380 |