Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/11/2002 01:37 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 355-MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAX
CHAIRMAN STEVENS announced HB 355 to be up for consideration.
MS. AMY ERICKSON, Staff to Representative Murkowski, said:
State and local governments tax mobile
telecommunication services in a variety of ways.
Because of the mobility of wireless equipment
determining which state and local taxes apply can be
very complicated. The process of determining where a
transaction is taxable is commonly referred to as
sourcing. In order to create a more uniform system for
taxing wireless calls, Congress passed a Mobile
Telecommunications Act in 2000. States now have until
August 1 of this year to conform to the federal act and
those states failing to conform will be preempted from
imposing taxes on most calls made outside of where the
customers' primary use occurs - those so-called roaming
customers - to another jurisdiction.
HB 355 conforms state law to federal law to clarify
that mobile telecommunications services are subject to
taxation in the users' primary place of use, the
residential or business address where the customers'
use of the mobile service primarily occurs. Passage
will prevent multiple taxation and allow the state to
appropriately tax wireless services and eliminate
confusion as to where to tax the wireless calls. This
bill does not impact the rate of taxes or fees that
state and localities impose on the wireless calls or
the types of calls subject to taxes. It's revenue
neutral. Each jurisdiction with taxing authority will
continue to determine to tax calls and at what rates.
The Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act was crafted
by industries, state and local tax officials and is
endorsed by such entities as the National Governor's
Association, the League of Cities and the Federal Tax
Administration.
MR. DARRELL BELL, AT&T, said he was available to answer
questions.
CHAIRMAN STEVENS wanted to make sure that this bill clarifies
that there is only one jurisdiction.
MS. ERICKSON explained further that if as a customer, she had
established Anchorage as her home, that means she could "roam" to
Seattle and Phoenix and Anchorage will always be able to tax her
call. Conversely, we can't tax anyone making a call from here who
lives in Seattle.
SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass CSHB 355(CRA) from committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying $0 fiscal note.
There were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|