Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
03/14/2018 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB355 | |
| HB75 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 75 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 355 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 355-FIRE;FOREST LAND; CRIMES;FIRE PREVENTION
3:20:29 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the first order of business would be
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 355(RES), "An Act relating to the crime of
criminally negligent burning; relating to protection of and fire
management on forested land; relating to prohibited acts and
penalties for prohibited acts on forested land; requiring the
Alaska Supreme Court to establish a bail schedule; and providing
for an effective date."
[Before the committee was the working draft, CSHB 355(RES),
labeled 30-LS1382\J.]
3:20:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAVID GUTTENBERG, Alaska State Legislature,
explained that HB 355 upgrades how the state deals with forest
fires, and clarifies language. He remarked that the state
cannot continue to have forest fires the size of the State of
Delaware year, after year, after year. [Representative
Guttenberg then paraphrased from the document titled "HB-355
Fire Prevention and Crimes on Forested Land.] He pointed out
that the some of the fires included: the Sockeye Fire that
caused $10 million in damages and was started by a human due to
careless open burning; the Card Street Fire in Soldotna was
human caused; the Funny River Fire was human caused and it was
in close proximity to the Card Street Fire from the previous
year; the Fairbanks Rex Bridge Fire near Clear was caused by
lightening; and the 2017 McHugh fire was started by a campfire
left behind by a hiker in Chugach State Park. The Division of
Forestry is trying to reduce the incidents of fire and set up a
schedule where people who simply do not have a burn barrel is
one thing, but someone who lets a fire get out of control is
something else, and someone that intentionally sets a forest
fire is another classification. Portions of this legislation
deal with more fire prevention programs, "and going down the
road and doing that stuff. Smokey the Bear kind of world."
This legislation includes some changes in statute to reflect
that the names have changed "so that the Division of Forestry is
actually what is referred to now where fire suppression is
actually what they're doing because those names change over
time," he said."
3:23:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP asked whether the intent of this legislation
is to update Title 41 statutes related to burning because the
statutes had not been reviewed in approximately 60 years.
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG responded that Representative Kopp was
correct.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP asked whether anyone could speak to the
changes in the different sections of HB 355.
3:25:09 PM
JOHN "CHRIS" MAISCH, Director & State Forester, Division of
Forestry, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), advised that
the last time these statutes were addressed was in 1961, and a
large portion of this bill updates the language for format and
the outdated style of writing and outdated terminology. He
paraphrased from the Sectional Analysis for Version J [included
in the members' packets], which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Section 1. Amends AS 11.46.427(a)(2) by adding
references to AS 41.15.060 -41.15.120 to make it
easier for agencies to coordinate enforcement of
similar statutes that appear in different Titles of
law.
Section 2. Amends AS 41.15.010 to add the word
forested land to the intent language of this statute.
Forested land is already defined in AS 41.15.170 and
brings consistency to terminology used in the
statutes.
Section 3. Amends AS 41.15.040 by updating terminology
by deleting the "division of land" and adding
"division of forestry". Clarifies the right of entry
to public or privately-owned land for the purpose of
preventing, suppressing, and controlling a wildland
fire to include for the purpose of "investigating" and
"when responding to a wildland fire or suspected fire
or administering the provisions of this chapter."
3:27:05 PM
MR. MAISCH explained that the words "at any time" were struck
because it was believed that "any time" was too broad and by
listing these out, it provided more specificity to that right of
entry piece. The prior statute read "preventing, suppression,
and control of wildland fire" and the term "investigating" was
added because the 1961 prevention was a holistic term that
included fire investigation for cause and determination.
Section 4. Adds a new subsection (b) to AS 41.15.040
that clarifies that a person may not interfere with or
prohibit access authorized under (a) of this section,
which is the right to enter for the purposes stated.
MR. MAISCH explained that the intent was to make clear to the
lay reader especially, that "investigating" was one of the
reasons the state had the right to enter the property. Clearly,
he advised, during an emergency that is one thing, but after an
emergency, if the division does not have permission from the
landowner to enter, it must seek a search warrant because the
landowner has standard protections under criminal or
constitutional law. He related that his prevention officers do
not carry badges or guns, they are peace officers, which is
defined later in the section. This language is solely for the
purposes of this chapter, and wildland and fire prevention is
related to the narrow definition of peace officer, he explained.
Section 5. Amends AS 41.15.050 Fire Season to allow
the commissioner the ability to designate other
periods as fire season at any time in order to allow
open burning only by permit or to prohibit open
burning.
Section 6. Amends AS 41.15.060. Permits. To include
obtaining a permit for setting of fires, use of
burning devices, and other activities and use of land
that increases fire danger. This would include burning
devices such as bum barrels, a common source of urban
interface ignitions. This section is also amended to
remove the type of offense a violation of this section
would be and relies on a new section to establish
types of violations.
3:28:55 PM
MR. MAISCH explained that the language is more specific as to
why the person is obtaining that permit. The current permit
system is only in place during fire season, which is the period
of time that is statutorily designated. The process, he
explained, is that a person can go online to self-issue a permit
which includes educational information about safe burning
practices and the things they must have on hand if they are
going to burn. Each day, the Division of Forestry opens and
closes burning based on conditions, he related, which could be
fire weather, availability of resources to respond to an
incident if it is already tied up with other wildland fire
activities, and it outlines the things a person must do to
safely use best practices to burn. Most importantly, the person
is to call in every day to determine whether it is a safe day to
burn, he advised.
Section 7. Adds a new subsection to AS 41.15.060
stating that a person may not participate in any
activities that increase fire danger without a permit
as prescribed by the commissioner in regulation.
Section 8. Amends AS 41.15.70. Disposal of burning
materials to read "may not discard ... burning
materials on forested land." Repeals language on the
type of violation this offense would be and relies on
amendments in Section 13 of this bill that provides a
new range of violations. It also removes a reference
to the "fire season" as the period of time this
section applies and removes a reference to "public or
private land".
Section 9. Amends AS 41.15.090. Building or leaving
fires. To read " ... may not start a fire ... without
first clearing the ground." The type of offense for a
violation of this section is removed and relies on a
new section to establish types of violations.
Sections 10. Amends AS 41.15.090 by adding a new
subsection (b) A person who starts a fire in or near
forested land may not leave the fire before totally
extinguishing the fire. This change makes it very
clear that leaving a fire unattended will result in
consequences.
Section 11. Clarifies AS 41.15.100 Setting fires
without consent. Updates language to "may not set on
fire forested land ... " to make this section
consistent with terminology and intent. The type of
offense for a violation of this section is repealed
and relies on a new section to establish types of
violations.
Section 12. Amends AS 41.15.110 Uncontrolled spread of
fire; leaving a fire unattended by repealing the type
of offense for a violation of this section and relies
on a new section to establish types of violations.
Subsection (b) has verbiage change to shall, a
positive action as opposed to the deleted current
language "who neglects to." New language is added to
make it clear that a person may not leave a fire
unattended and the type of offense for a violation of
this section is removed and relies on a new section to
establish types of violations. Subsection (c) updates
terminology and makes it clear in any criminal action
brought under this section that the escape of a fire
may be evidence that the person acted knowingly. This
change helps define mental state.
Section 13. Amends AS 41.15.120 by including the term
investigate as one of the criteria for when an officer
or employee of the United States or the state who is
authorized to prevent and suppress fire requests a
person to assist with such efforts. It also adds the
word shall as opposed to "fails to" in determining if
a person is in violation of the statute. The type of
offense for a violation of this section is removed and
relies on a new section to establish types of
violations.
Section 14. Amends AS 41.15.130 Backfires. Adds the
terminology and burnouts to allow fire suppression
activity as "directed by an officer or employee of the
U.S. or state who is authorized ... " and makes it
clear that AS 41 .15.045 (Civil immunity) applies to
the activities under this section.
3:31:27 PM
MR. MAISCH explained that Section 14 updates some terminology,
and "backfires" is the term used when the division lights fires
to fight fire, but the more common term is "burnout," which is
similar to a backfire, except backfire is a more outdated term.
When speaking with firefighters these days, they would rarely
use that language, firefighters refer to using fire to fight
fire as a burnout operation. The specific statutes are cited
and it makes some clarification as to when fire is used, as
opposed to the general term backfire.
Section 15. Repeals and reenacts AS 41.15.140 to
establish a range of violations and fines that
increase with the seriousness of the offense. This
section also links to the criminal statutes to improve
the understanding and consistency between enforcement
agencies and the courts.
Subsection (a) makes it clear that if AS 41. 15.150
applies, a felony charge, the following sections do
not apply.
Subsection (a)(l) establishes a class A misdemeanor
offense for violations of AS 41.15.010- 41.15 .130 for
persons who knowingly violate this section.
Subsection (a)(2) establishes a fine amount in
accordance with AS 12.55
Section 16. Amends AS 41.15.150 to provide specific
criteria for criminal burning in the first degree if
(a)(l) the person violates AS 41.15.155, and (2) a
provision of 41.15.010-41.15.130 or a regulation
adopted under AS 41.15.010-41.15.130
Subsection (b) provides for a class B felony if in
violation of subsection (a) of this section and is
punishable as provided in AS 12.55 the Sentencing and
Probation Chapter of Title 12.
Section 17. Amends AS 41.15.150 by adding a new
section to provide specific criteria for criminal
burning in the second degree if the person (a)(l)
knowingly sets a fire, (2) with criminal negligence,
the person (a) permits the fire to spread beyond the
person's control or (b)fails to prevent the fire from
spreading to forested land or other flammable material
and (3) as a result, the fire burns forested land or
other flammable material located or growing on land
that is not owned, possessed or controlled by the
person.
Subsection (b) provides for a class C felony if in
violation of subsection (a) of this section and is
punishable as provided in AS 12.55 the Sentencing and
Probation Chapter of Title 12.
Subsection (d) provides for an upgrading violation to
a class B felony if the initial setting of the fire is
in violation of AS 41.15.010 - 41.15. 130 or a
regulation adopted under AS 41.15.010 - 41.15.130.
Section 18. Amends AS 41.150.160. Double damages in
civil actions to clarify applicable statutes for this
provision.
Section 19. Amends AS 41.15.170 to add paragraph (5)
"knowingly" which has the meaning in AS 11.81.900 and
adds paragraph ( 6) "recklessly" which has the meaning
given in AS 11.81 .900.
Section 20. Amends AS 41.15.950 to add (b)(4) a new
subsection to provide clear authority to issue a
citation to a person who violates a provision of AS
41.15.010 - 41.15.170 or a regulation adopted under
this chapter.
Section 21. Adds a new section AS 41.15.960 directing
the supreme court to establish a bail schedule for
violations of statute specified in this bill.
Section 22. Repeals AS 41.15.080 which was a section
on equipment and notice requirement for operators of a
conveyance on or above forested land to be equipped
with a receptacle for the disposal of burning
material, shall post or display a copy of AS 41.15.050
- .080 and 41.15.140 in a conspicuous place.
Additionally, an operator of a milling, logging or
commercial operation shall also post and display a
copy of the statute per the previous notation and if
found in violation of this section, is guilty of a
misdemeanor.
Section 23. Amends the uncodified law of the State of
Alaska by adding a new section to read: TRANSITION:
REGULATIONS. The Department of Natural Resources may
adopt regulation necessary to implement the changes
made by this Act. The regulation take effect under AS
44.62 (Administrative Procedure Act), but not before
the effective date of the law implemented by the
regulation.
Section 24. Provides courts 120 days to establish bail
schedule required by Section 21.
Section 25. Sections 23 and 24 take effect immediately
under AS 01.10.070 (c)
Section 26. Except as provided in Section 25, this Act
takes effect July 1, 2018.
3:32:52 PM
MR. MAISCH offered that the whole purpose behind HB 355 is about
fire education and preventing human-caused wildfires. He
pointed to the document on the committee table titled, "HB 355
Fire Prevention and Crimes on Forested Land" and advised that
approximately 80 percent of the fires in Alaska are the result
of humans, especially around communities. He pointed to the
examples of five different wildfires in the last few years that
have cost the general fund, $20 million in one case, $10 million
in another case, and significant loss of structures for primary
residents. He related that even if one of those fires could be
prevented, it saves the state significant general fund monies,
and significant damage to private individuals.
3:33:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP referred to Sec. 2, [AS 41.15.010], page 2,
lines 4-7, which read as follows:
It is the intent of AS 41.15.010 - 41.15.170 to
provide protection from wildland fire and other
destructive agents, commensurate with the values at
risk, on forested land that is owned privately, by the
state, or by a municipality.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP offered a scenario of a fire, such as the
Sockeye Fire, that would sweep through a forested land and then
move through a residential area that is solely made up of homes.
He asked whether the statutes that come into play to address the
negligent burning go over to Title 11 in those areas and the
Title 41 offenses, or if it is all the same event as to
enforcement. The state has these mirror sets of laws between
Titles 11 and 41, and he said that he would like to have an idea
of the interplay between the two statutes.
MR. MAISCH responded that in Title 41, the definition of
forested land is broad as it includes, brush, grass, and
basically any flammable organic material. Therefore, it doesn't
matter where the fire occurs on the landscape, it is what the
division calls the "urban interface" which would be communities
and subdivisions, small villages, or in the true wildlands which
would be more like forest land. The Title 41 statute would
apply whether it is in an urban or rural setting as far as the
enforcement of the burning statutes. He explained that a
portion of this bill does cross-reference the criminal part over
to the criminal code. Currently, the only ability the division
has is to issue a violation for the violation of these statutes,
which is a mandatory court appearance as well as coordination
with the District Attorney's Office. It is rare that the
division takes that that action because it has to be a serious
case as the courts are already tied up with more important
matters. This legislation would offer the division more of a
range of options in dealing with infractions of the burn
regulations, he explained.
3:35:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP surmised that there are solely civil
violations here, and there are offenses here that are not
misdemeanors.
MR. MAISCH answered that the division is proposing a bail
schedule similar to a traffic ticket, to be approved by the
Alaska Supreme Court. He said, "Not a maximum of $500, but they
would establish the amounts based on the type of offense in the
regulations, a class A misdemeanor offense, and then two felony
offenses that are both at a class B and C level. He noted that
this is a scaled approach to enforcement and as the type of
offenses committed become more serious, potentially there is a
greater punishment, and that is the criminal phase. Currently,
he advised, the division has the ability to recover costs on the
civil side, and that is oftentimes how the division recovers
costs.
3:36:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD asked whether Mr. Maisch was familiar
with "Firewise?"
MR. MAISCH responded that Firewise is a program the division is
actively promoting, it offers education, and it works directly
with the homeowners and communities.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD advised that she has participated in
Firewise and it provides excellent programs. Firewise has
helped out with private property and it also helps with trail
building efforts to decrease the amount of debris and materials
that would stimulate fires. She asked whether Mr. Maisch works
with the "Hot Shots?"
MR. MAISCH answered that the division is the "Hot Shots," and he
would be happy to talk about the crews because they are
important resources to the division and are equivalent to a
"smoke jumper" in terms of the level of training and
professionalism.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD advised that she has tried for
approximately five years to get them into her area but it is
competitive" because they are in high demand. She commented
that they are extremely well trained and professional, but she
ended up using prisoners to help clear the debris to reduce the
fire hazards in her area and "they were awesome with the
chainsaw."
3:38:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD referred to Sec. 5. [AS 41.15.050], page
2, lines 21-30, and asked whether there are any changes in
permitting.
MR. MAISCH replied that there are no changes to permitting, and
that Section 5 clarifies that the commissioner has the
authority, at any time, to extend the fire season based on need.
3:39:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD referred to Sec. 10. [AS 41.15.100],
page 3, lines 22-23, which read as follows:
(b) A person who starts a fire in or near
forested land may not leave the fire before totally
extinguishing the fire.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD asked whether there is a definition of
"totally extinguishing the fire."
MR. MAISCH responded that the division points out that a person
must be able to touch it with their hand. He explained that
"cold and out" is the common way in which firefighters will look
when performing mop up on a fire to make sure a hot ember is not
covered in ash. Smokey Bear, the most iconic figure
internationally, offers the good message of, "stir the fire."
The fire must be dead-out and the best way to determine whether
a fire is dead-out is by touch. He offered that the division's
education programs focus on that, it offers school programs, it
is at the fairs around the state, and it is at all community
events where it has an opportunity to see and meet a lot of
people. The division's prevention officer teaches safe burning
practices, including how to properly extinguish a campfire to be
certain it is dead-out, he remarked.
3:40:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD asked whether the division runs the
Smokey Bear program.
MR. MAISCH answered that the United States Forest Service has
the copyright for Smokey the Bear, but yes, the division has its
own Smokey the Bear costumes in every area office, and they are
active with Smokey the Bear type of issues.
3:41:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD referred to Sec. 18. [AS 41.15.160],
page 5, lines 26-31 and page 6, lines 1-3, and paraphrased that
"you can double the damages in civil actions." She asked Mr.
Maisch to elaborate.
MR. MAISCH replied that double damages is the standard starting
point of civil recovery, and there are many reasons for a fire,
such as accidental and negligent, negligent, or a lot of
different standards that the division is reviewing. He pointed
out that double damages is the standard starting point for cost
recovery and it typically gets the attention of the party the
entity is trying to recover costs from, typically they settle
for insurance limits, depending upon the situation. The
division is not out to bankrupt an individual or a business, but
it depends on how egregious the offense, he offered.
3:42:24 PM
ANNE NELSON, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Natural
Resources Section, Civil Division (Anchorage), Department of
Law, explained that the double damages provision is available to
any person, as well as governmental entities, that have incurred
suppression costs. She described that it is a mechanism that
functions not only as a deterrent, but also as a method for the
state, in this case the Division of Forestry, to recoup the
costs of fighting a fire. This provision is also available to
property owners who may have lost property during a fire, she
offered.
3:42:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD asked whether the double damages only
include the suppression costs, or does it include property
damage to the private landowner.
MR. MAISCH answered that for the division, it is simply trying
to recover its costs of preventing the fire. Although, he
offered, sometimes when there are not sufficient insurance
proceeds, the division will subordinate itself and first let the
damaged homeowner be made whole for the damages they suffered
before the state will then step in and recover costs.
Typically, the division does not go for the value of the timber
or the land, it is just the suppression costs, he said.
3:43:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD referred to Secs. 21 and 24 and noted
that they go hand-in-hand with regard to the bail schedule and
asked whether the division has 120 days to develop a bail
schedule.
MS. NELSON responded that the Alaska Supreme Court must adopt a
bail schedule. Under this bill, the Division of Forestry would
adopt regulations implementing these statutes and create the
bailable offenses, which are essentially non-criminal tickets
that can be satisfied without a court appearance by simply
paying the fine. Once the regulations have been through the
public comment period and are properly adopted under the
Administrative Procedures Act (APA), those regulations would be
sent to the Alaska Supreme Court with a suggested bail schedule,
she explained. The Alaska Supreme Court would then review the
regulations and, she opined, it would publish them under
Administrative Rule 43.
3:45:08 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on HB 355.
3:45:51 PM
BRENDA AHLBERG, Kenai Peninsula Borough, advised that on behalf
of Mayor Charlie Pierce and the Kenai Peninsula Borough, they
support the enactment of HB 355. As the Kenai Peninsula's
population continues to grow, so too does the expectation that
wildfires must be reduced using combined strategies. Too often,
she pointed out that people quickly lose the sense of awareness
or fail to practice prevention after the response to wildfires
and costly rehabilitation measures have been completed for the
season. This bill creates an updated framework that addresses
fire prevention and enforcement actions aimed at reducing risk,
educating the public through outreach, and recognizing the
movement toward establishing fire adapted communities. She
commented, "Let's face it, we live in the trees, the wildland-
urban interface (WUI) and fuels reduction projects on private or
public landholding should compliment fire as a natural
occurrence on the landscape." Approximately 98 percent of all
fire starts on the Kenai Peninsula are human caused and that is
not acceptable. As the WUI continues to intermingle with
forested land, and as people continue to live in the trees,
there is a need to recognize that minimizing wildfire risk is a
shared responsibility among all landowners, she remarked.
3:47:39 PM
JAMES SQURYES noted his appreciation for the amendment process
that took place during the last committee of referral, but there
is still work to be accomplished on HB 355. He noted that he
has been concerned for some time with AS 42.15. He offered hope
that legislators use this opportunity to make additional
amendments to this bill to bring the statutes in line with the
constitutional elements that legislators swore to uphold under
Article 12, Sec. 5, of the Constitution of the State of Alaska.
In particular, Sec. 3 of the bill refers to AS 41.15.040, the
right of entry to control and suppress fires, needs to be
realigned with Article 1, Section 14 of the Constitution of the
State of Alaska, and the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of
the United States against unreasonable searches when it comes to
private property. (Indisc.) wants the Division of Forestry to
charge in and control and suppress wildfire even if it is on
private property, that is not the question here. He commented
that Alaska is a huge state and there is not that much private
property, even less when backing out urban from rural privately
owned forested land. He noted that what is in question is the
current prevention terminology in statute that can be easily
abused by virtually any employee in the Division of Forestry to
enter private property when there is no probable cause that a
crime is being committed. Currently, a Division of Forestry
employee is considered a peace officer under AS 41.15.950 and
may climb over a rock and posted gate and walk down a person's
driveway, where the homeowner clearly expressed their
expectation of privacy, without probable cause that a crime is
being committed to prevent, not just a wildfire, but any fire.
Many Alaskans, like himself, currently have smoke rolling out
the top of their chimneys as he presents his testimony. None of
the people have a problem [rising to] probable cause, yet they
know that Article 1, Section 22 indicates that the right of the
people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed, he
said. AS 41.15.040 could be cleaned up by a simple amendment on
page 2, line 14, adding the word "wildland" between the words
"suspected fire;" and on page 2, line 16, removing the word
"preventing." The title of this section could be modernized by
changing it to "AS 41.15.040, Authority of entry to control and
suppress ...
CHAIR CLAMAN advised Mr. Squryes that he had gone over his two
minutes and asked that he conclude his remarks.
MR. SQURYES said he wanted to address the situation of peace
officers under AS 41.15.950 being applied to the employees of
the Division of Forestry who are not trained as peace officers.
3:50:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked about his concerns with regard to
peace officers in this bill.
MR. SQURYES explained that AS 11.61.220 involves misconduct
involving weapons in the fifth degree, whereby an Alaskan
carrying a concealed firearm, even on his own private property,
has a duty to immediately notify a peace officer that they are
carrying a concealed firearm, and the peace officer has the
right to secure the deadly weapon. He described that this
procedure, wherein someone on the fire crew is not trained in
performing, opens the pandora's box to the possibility of
undesirable outcomes. In revising the statute, it is time for
this issue to be addressed, he said.
3:51:32 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN, after ascertaining that no one wished to testify,
closed public testimony on HB 355.
[HB 355 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB355 ver J 3.14.18.PDF |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/2/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/2/2018 7:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB355 Sponsor Statement 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/2/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/2/2018 7:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB355 Sectional Analysis ver J 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB355 Explanation of Changes ver D to J 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB355 Supporting Document-Expanded One Pager 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB355 Supporting Document-Alaska Fire Chiefs Support Letter 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB355 Fiscal Note LAW-CRIM 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB355 Fiscal Note DNR-FSP 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB075 ver D 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Sectional Analysis 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Sponsor Statement 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Washington Post Article - Five States Allow Gun Seizures 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Washington Post Article - Missouri Case 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-The Trace Article - ERPOs Reduce Suicides 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Sandy Hook Promise Letter 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Sandy Hook Promise Letters (Part 1) 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Public Comment (Part 1) 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Fact Sheet 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Fiscal Note DHSS-EPI 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Fiscal Note LAW-CRIM 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Fiscal Note DPS-CJISP 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Fiscal Note DPS-DET 2.28.18.pdf |
HJUD 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Fiscal Note JUD-ACS 3.12.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Opposing Document-Public Comment (Part 1) 3.12.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Public Comment (Part 3) 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-NYT Opinion - Mental Health System Can't Stop Mass Shooters 3.12.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Public Comment (Part 2) 3.12.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/12/2018 7:00:00 PM HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Supporting Document-Sandy Hook Promise Letters (Part 2) 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB075 Opposing Document-Public Comment (Part 2) 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/16/2018 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 75 |
| HB355 Supporting Document-Alaska Fire Chiefs Letter 3.14.18.pdf |
HJUD 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM |
HB 355 |