Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/02/2010 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB171 | |
| HB357 | |
| HB344 | |
| HB317 | |
| HB355 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 317 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 355 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 344 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 357 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 355
"An Act relating to criminal fines for organizations."
REPRESENTATIVE MAX GRUENBERG talked about Version P, the
House Judiciary version of HB 355, which raises the amount
of fines for corporations and other criminal organizations,
as shown on lines 7-13, page 1. It has been a number of
years since those fines were raised. The size of necessary
deterrents has not kept pace with the crimes, which are
often large. Under AS 11.16.130, a corporation or
partnership is legally accountable in a criminal sense for
the operations or conduct of an agent employed by the
company. The criminal fine section is key in deterring
organizational crime.
Representative Gruenberg addressed the second purpose of
the bill, which begins on page 2, lines 1-7, and closes a
loophole. He gave an example of a bribe whose purpose was
to stop a tax. The tax went through any way, resulting in
no gain to the defendant and no loss to the victim. He
termed the example a conspiracy - a criminal contract to
commit a crime.
Representative Gruenberg described the third category
covered in the bill, criminal solicitation - a request for
someone else to commit a crime. The statute is crafted so
that the maximum a judge can order is three times the gain
to the defendant, or three times the loss to the victim.
This provides for a reasonable deterrent.
Representative Gruenberg added that there is no fiscal
impact from the bill. All fines collected would go into the
general fund.
Co-Chair Stoltze questioned the inclusion of the
applicability section on page 2, lines 10-11.
Representative Gruenberg responded that it is in the bill
so there's no question that it would be applied in an
unconstitutional ex post facto manner.
3:56:36 PM
RICK SVOBODNY, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LAW,
introduced himself. He noted that the Department of Law
supports the bill.
Representative Fairclough inquired when the fines were last
raised or adjusted. Mr. Svobodny replied that there was a
raise in the penalty provisions for non-corporate crimes
three years ago, but he did not know if corporate crimes
were included.
GRETCHEN STAFT, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG, noted the
fines on page 1, lines 9-13, were last set in 1990. The
amount on page 1, line 7, was set in 2002.
Representative Fairclough asked what the increase prior to
2002 was. Ms. Staff said she would have to research that
information. She believe it increased from $500,000 to $1
million.
Representative Foster inquired how these amounts compare to
other states. Ms. Staff replied that they were slightly
higher than other states, but they are maximums and the
court can set a lower fine.
4:00:11 PM
Ms. Staff read that the fines depend on the type and level
of the crimes. Some states do not separate felony from
misdemeanor crimes. She gave examples of fines in various
states.
Co-Chair Stoltze requested the data in writing.
Representative Gruenberg pointed out that the numbers were
suggestions. He left the decisions up to the committee.
Representative Fairclough wanted further justification for
increasing the fines.
4:02:43 PM
Mr. Svobodny gave an example of a fine. Three years ago the
state was in a process of investigating BP for the shutdown
of the North Slope oil fields based on BP's negligence. At
that time the maximum fine would have been $500,000. The
state ultimately agreed to join with the federal government
in a resolution of that case which resulted in a penalty of
$4 million. Some corporations have conduct that can result
in fairly large penalties.
Co-Chair Stoltze spoke in support of the bill.
4:04:41 PM
Representative Kelly commented that it looked like a huge
disparity compared with other states. He thought it wasn't
business friendly.
Co-Chair Stoltze maintained that the state was only being
unfriendly to businesses that commit a crime.
Representative Doogan thought the amount might not be
enough for some of the kinds of crimes imagined.
4:05:59 PM
Representative Gara commended the closing of a loophole in
the bill.
Co-Chair Stoltze referred to a zero fiscal note.
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report CSHB 355(JUD) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSHB 355(JUD) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with previously published zero
fiscal note: FN1 (LAW)
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 3.Letter of intent CSHB317.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| 4.HB 317 sponsor statment.docx |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| 5.HB317 changes between original and CS.docx |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| 10.Increases to education funding chart from DEED.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| 11.AMYAHouseEdCommQuestions.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| 12.support.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| 01 HB355 Sponsor Statement[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 355 Law Review Article.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 355 |
| HB 317 Amendment #1 Gara.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| SB 171 Amendment Thomas.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| CSSB 171 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| CSSB 171 Memo on changes 04092009.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| CSSB171(FIN)-REV-PFD-02-09-10NEW PFD for Deceased Individuals.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| HB 357 WORKDRAFT CS 26-LS1356 S Version.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB 357 Letter of Intent.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB 357 Legal Memo.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB 357 City of Whittier Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB357 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 357 |
| HB 317 Gara Amendment Backup.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| HB 317 Amendment Gara #2.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 317 |
| SB 171 CS WORKDRAFT 26 LS0804 C Version.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB 171 Fiscal Note DOR.pdf |
HFIN 4/2/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |