Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/15/2010 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB350 | |
| HB413 | |
| HB393 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 413 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 393 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 350 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 350-PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING: LOCAL CONTRIBUTION
8:04:07 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 350, "An Act relating to the local contribution
to public school funding; and providing for an effective date."
8:05:04 AM
CHAIR SEATON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 350.
8:05:38 AM
CHAIR SEATON refreshed members on the purpose of HB 350. This
bill would address the local contribution to the "basic need
component," which is funded under the foundation formula for
school funding. Under the bill, the amount of the "basic need
component" does not change, but the amount of state and local
effort will change. He stated that the bill effectively would
provide differential tax relief to various school districts
across the state. Thus, funds are removed from the school
education fund and used for differential tax relief for
municipalities. The goal of HB 350 is to apply an even method
of taxation, one that is proportionally fair and economically
sustainable by setting a uniform mill rate at the lowest current
rate. The result will be that a municipality will not have to
pay more than its current local tax mill rate. He paraphrased
from a portion of the sponsor statement, which read as follows
[original punctuation provided]:
Legislation enacted in 2001 changed the funding
formula to require that only half of the increased
current year's property value over the base year's
value be counted. However it added this to a fixed
year (FY 99) to determine the property value for the
purposes of calculating required local effort for
education. Use of a fixed base year instead of the
previous year to calculate full and true value and
local effort contribution has lead to a growing
disparity between districts.
HB 350 will address this problem by requiring the
local contribution of a city or borough school
district to be derived from a uniform rate of a 2.7
mill tax levy on the full and true value of the
taxable property in the district as of January 1 of
the second preceding fiscal year plus 50% of the
increase in value to the following year.
Under the current formula, areas with growing
populations are given an ever greater tax break than
stable areas. Districts containing older communities
are therefore required to pay higher taxes than
expanding districts. HB 350 will apply an even method
of taxation, one that is proportionally fair and
economically sustainable. It has set a uniform mill
rate at the lowest current rate so no municipality
will have to pay more than its current local tax mill
rate
CHAIR SEATON referred to a chart in members' packets, stating
that currently the state transfers $77 million a year out of
available money for education to municipalities as tax relief.
This does not change the districts' funding, but funds are
transferred differentially to districts. The continuously
mounting increase in education costs will result in limiting the
base student allocation (BSA) increases. Most school districts
support "fixing" this system before it consumes a major portion
of the state's education funds.
8:09:27 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER pointed out that the "differential tax
relief" has been perceived as an unfair allocation to districts
but was intended to provide additional funds to school districts
that are growing in size. He referred to a graph in members'
packets titled "Percent Change is Assessed Valuation of Taxable
Property in the Mat-Su Borough." He explained that the costs
increase with additional students in the Mat-Su Borough. He
agreed that "something may need to be fixed" but the problem is
not an "across the board" difference in taxes needed from the
local communities. The tax burden on landowners is "out of
sight." To address this issue, the state provided general fund
(GF) dollars to local districts that are increasing in size. He
said he will oppose the bill since he does not agree with the
approach taken in HB 350 to address the problem.
8:11:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON pointed out that school bonds are being
voted down. She remarked that many students are using temporary
school facilities yet the communities have voted down school
bonds for new schools.
8:11:45 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER requested further information on whether
the Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District has not approved
school bonds.
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON related it has done so in the past, but
she was unsure what has currently happened.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER maintained that his district faces
challenges, noting it is not just the lack of facilities since
expanding at the rate it has costs money for teachers and to
provide start up costs for schools.
8:12:34 AM
CHAIR SEATON stated HB 350 was constructed to accommodate the
growth in the various communities. This bill would not directly
affect the mill rate that is assessed on each home or business.
This bill does not create a direct tax. Additionally,
communities also have the option to find other funding sources
for education. Some districts, such as the Kenai Peninsula
Borough, have adopted a sales tax dedicated to education. This
bill provides a method of calculation based on valuation, he
stated.
8:13:55 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ referred to the handout in members' packets
titled "Mill Equivalent Change"and noted that the City of Juneau
has participated at 4 mills. She asked for the effect of HB
350, and if it would lower the mill rate to 2.7 mills.
CHAIR SEATON agreed it would lower the mill rate. He explained
it would treat all districts across the state at the same mill
rate. He referenced a table in members' packets titled "Mill
Equivalent Change" to indicate the mill differences. He further
explained that if a community grew substantially since 1999,
that the millage rate would be at a much less valuation. He
referred to Craig, which is still paying 4 mills on its
valuation, whereas Saint Marys increased its tax base and is
paying 2.7 mills. He interpreted that communities that are not
growing will contribute a higher portion of the basic need. He
pointed out the impact on several districts, including his
district, the Kenai Peninsula Borough, which is set at 3 mills.
8:16:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked for clarification on whether
communities have a choice.
CHAIR SEATON answered no. He elaborated that the basic need for
education is calculated in the foundation formula. The original
calculation for local contribution was calculated at 4 mills
times the assessed valuation. In 2000, the statute was changed.
Initially, that legislation had a "rolling look back" but the
bill was amended to establish a "given year" to use as the
inception year. He offered his belief that since the change
happened late in the session an unintended consequence happened.
This bill is to ensure adequate state funding for education.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER noted that if the committee takes the
position that this should be equitable across the state, has the
impact for unincorporated boroughs shall be considered. He also
asked if the bill should contain a requirement for local payment
since the legislature acts as the school board for
unincorporated boroughs.
8:19:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE EDGMON stated that the overall costs are affected
by how schools are constructed and heated, such as whether
diesel fuel is used to heat the school versus natural gas. He
offered to provide the "numbers" for his district.
CHAIR SEATON asked members to focus on the specific issue the
bill addresses.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER commented that the struggle is with the
growth or the differential costs for operation and not the
diesel costs.
8:20:34 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked the department to explain how the local
contribution occurs in the unorganized boroughs.
8:21:11 AM
EDDY JEANS, Director, School Finance and Facilities Section,
Department of Education and Early Development (EED), explained
that the Regional Education Attendance Areas (REAAs) do not have
a required local contribution based on property values. The
REAAs' local contribution is through the form of the "impact aid
contribution." Thus, the impact aid is in lieu of property
taxes paid by the federal government for people who reside on
federal lands that are not subject to taxes. He offered that he
would consider the impact aid as the local contribution for the
REAAs. He pointed out that some REAA's have more federal land
than others and those with a smaller or larger tax base
contribute more or less, accordingly. He noted some
municipalities have a larger tax base than others, and are
required to contribute more to support education. Those
municipalities with a smaller tax base would also contribute
less. The change that is before the committee today is to
achieve uniformity on the mill levy in the required local
effort. As Chair Seaton noted, the basic education foundation
formula calculates the basic need, which is the adjusted ADM
multiplied by the base student allocation (BSA). Once the basic
need is established, "we determine who is going to pay." Three
components are considered: required local contribution, impact
aid, and state aid. The required local contribution ranges from
2.7 mills to 4 mills on real and personal property values, using
the schedule previously referred to by Chair Seaton. This bill
would level the required local contribution from the current
mill rate to 2.7 mills across the board. It does not increase
the amount of funding for the foundation formula program but it
simply shifts it from who is paying, local versus state.
CHAIR SEATON asked for clarification on the statement that the
amount of funding to a school district would not change.
MR, JEANS responded that he is referring to the amount of
funding to a school district via the funding formula.
8:23:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON related her understanding that the
impact aid from the REAAs would not be affected.
MR. JEANS responded that the REAAs are required to contribute 90
percent of the impact aid that they receive.
8:24:17 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER asked whether the committee has used a
property valuation to assess how the impact aid compares to the
2.7 mill rate under consideration.
MR. JEANS answered that property values do not exist in the
unorganized areas. He offered that the closest comparison would
be the per pupil valuation on the impact aid compared to local
effort. He recalled comparisons that showed a number of REAAs
at the top of the scale that contribute more money on a per
student basis, through impact aid, than many municipalities. He
noted some REAAs at the bottom of the scale are not contributing
much since not many people live on federal lands. The range
varies considerably, he stated.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER stated that if the committee's goal is
statewide uniformity the committee will need to broaden its
scope.
8:25:29 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the impact aid is based on
economic activity on federal lands.
MR. JEANS answered no, that it is based on the land being non-
taxable land.
8:25:46 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked if the people living on federal, non-taxable
land are not taxed by the state.
MR. JEANS related that the impact aid is for lands that have
been moved from state tax rolls due to some type of federal
intervention. Thus, lands conveyed under the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) are non-taxable lands until
developed and the people living on those lands generate federal
impact aid. Additionally, people living on military bases are
not taxed and also generate federal impact aid.
8:26:57 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ moved to report HB 350 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER objected.
8:27:34 AM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Seaton, Munoz,
Gardner, Buch, Edgmon, and Wilson voted in favor of HB 350.
Representative Keller voted against it. Therefore, HB 350 was
reported out of the House Education Standing Committee by a vote
of 6-1.
8:28:27 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 393 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/24/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/31/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| HB 393 Charter School statutes.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/24/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| back up AMYA.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 413 |
| HB413-EED-ESS-3-10-10.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 413 |
| sponsor statment HB413.docx |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 413 |
| HB 393 Charter School Background.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/24/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Support ltr fed dir.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Per pupil fac aid.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Fed Funding.pdf |
HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Discret Grants.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| AK Grade 10.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/29/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| Support public.pdf |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/31/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 393 |
| FY02-11LocalEffortAssessed&educationWithMills-2Pager_10-22-09.xlsx |
HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| HB350-EED-ESS-2-18-10.pdf |
HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| current program flow chart.docx |
HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| Sponsor Statement HB 350.doc |
HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |