Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/03/2010 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB347 | |
| HB350 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 350 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 285 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 347 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 350-PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING: LOCAL CONTRIBUTION
8:34:51 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 350, "An Act relating to the local contribution
to public school funding; and providing for an effective date."
DAVE JONES, Assistant Superintendent, Kenai Peninsula Borough
School District (KPBSD), informed the committee that legislation
enacted in 2001 created a disparity in local mill levy
equivalents and a serious equity issue among school districts;
however, HB 350 would resolve the equity issue. Historically,
his school district has been "funded to the cap," thus local
support provided by taxpayers has increased significantly. The
bill would lower the [local maximum allowed by law] and provide
local taxpayer relief without a revenue loss to the school
district; therefore, he related that the KPBSD school board is
in strong favor of HB 350, and would like to see the bill move
forward.
8:37:16 AM
GEORGE TROXEL, Superintendent, Mat-Su Borough School District,
paraphrased from a prepared statement, which read as follows
[original punctuation provided]:
House Bill 350 reduces the revenue available to the
Mat Su School District without increasing local taxes,
and furthermore, that impact is exponential over
coming years. I don't support HB 350 for that reason.
The Mat-Su School District is experiencing financial
hardships due to the general nature of expenses rising
faster than revenues in these times. Given this
scenario, the Mat-Su and two other Districts in the
state are singled out by HB 350 to get a double whammy
in the area of revenue shortfalls.
The Mat-Su School District has a growing enrollment,
over 800 students in the last three years. The
District did realize revenue enhancements generated by
the growth. Revenue increases received because of
increased enrollment take care of day-to-day expenses
but not the expenses of more general support and
infrastructure, such as buildings, grounds,
furnishings, and equipment.
In the past 10 years as many new schools have been
opened in the Valley. The opening of new schools has
tremendous impact on annual budgets. In the Mat-Su we
plan approximately a million dollars above the usual
annual operating costs for that first year a school is
open. Growth in the Valley is a good thing for the
State of Alaska, growth has its costs, and while the
Valley appreciates the Stat's support in handling this
growth that help is also an expectation for which the
state as a whole realizes dividends.
New schools are needed in the Valley. These new
schools will further stress the property owners
capacity to keep up with increasing demand for more
tax dollars to build these schools. The District
currently uses 61 portable buildings for classrooms.
These house close to 2000 student full time
equivalents. Bonds will need to be passed in the near
future that will rely on subsequent tax increases to
construct these needed schools.
House Bill 350 ultimately puts the askance for more
dollars from property owners in the Mat-Su. The
valley is not a home to major or great amounts of
industry. Many of our taxpayers are those who can
least afford more and more property tax increases.
Median incomes for most who work in the Valley are on
the low end of the scale. Multiply that by the fact
that a sizable percentage of gross property value in
the Valley is not a result of newly developed property
resulting from growth, but rising property tax
assessments on existing property. When higher tax
assessments come about because of increased value of a
property, the long term property owners become
victims. Just because a property's value increases it
does not follow that a property owner's ability to pay
more in taxes increases.
All of us are in dire budgetary circumstances with
more and more challenges. This is not the time to
change formulas for funding where anyone loses while
others are experiencing substantial gains.
8:40:56 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked for clarification on how HB 350 would reduce
the revenue available to the Mat-Su School District without
increasing local taxes. He observed that the intention of the
bill was to lower the mill rate across the state.
8:41:38 AM
MR. TROXEL explained that HB 305 changes the base year from 1999
to "one year in the past." Due to the increase in property
values, even though the mill rate remains constant, the dollar
amount of the assessment is greatly increased. In future years
to maintain funding, those dollars would be provided by local
taxpayers.
8:42:39 AM
CHAIR SEATON pointed out the intent of the bill was to assign
all of the municipalities across the state the same mill rate
required for local contributions. He surmised the mill rate was
not Mr. Troxel's concern.
8:43:28 AM
MR. TROXEL said he is not opposed to a 2.7 mill rate, but the
shifting of the base year to a more recent year with higher
property values, results in a substantial increase in the local
contribution.
CHAIR SEATON restated Mr. Troxel's objection to the bill was
regarding the change from a fixed base year, with new growth
taxed at 50 percent, to a rolling base year.
8:45:19 AM
MR. TROXEL said yes, and added that the relevant provision is in
Sec. 4 of the bill.
8:45:57 AM
COLLEEN VAGUE, President, Mat-Su District School Board, informed
the committee her school district has built eight new schools in
the last ten years. Each school was financed by homeowner bonds
that increased taxes for homeowners. She noted that three of
the new elementary schools are now at, or over, capacity and the
district lacks sufficient buildings to house and educate its
school population. In addition, at the current growth rate, the
district will be further behind in five years. Ms. Vague
pointed out that the increase in student population does not
result in more money for school construction; in fact, the
student population in the Mat-Su School District increased from
12,699 students in 1999 to the present count of 16,673 students.
She reiterated the school board's opposition to Sec. 4 of the
bill.
8:49:29 AM
CHAIR SEATON stated that HB 350 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| FY02-11LocalEffortAssessed&educationWithMills-2Pager_10-22-09.xlsx |
HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| HB350-EED-ESS-2-18-10.pdf |
HEDC 2/19/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| current program flow chart.docx |
HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/12/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/15/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 350 |
| HB 347 sponsor statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB 347 backup.pdf |
HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |
| HB 347 sectional.pdf |
HEDC 3/3/2010 8:00:00 AM HEDC 3/10/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 347 |