Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
04/15/2024 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB386 | |
| HB105 | |
| HB338 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 386 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 338 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 105 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 338-PHYS LBLTY: GENDER TRANS PROCEDURE;MINORS
2:19:19 PM
CHAIR VANCE announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 338, "An Act relating to physician liability for
gender transition procedures performed on minors; and providing
for an effective date."
2:19:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD, prime sponsor, presented HB 338. She
shared the sponsor statement [included in the committee packet],
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
An alarming number of adults who received gender
transition treatments or surgeries as children have
regretted those decisions. Over the last few years,
many European countries have adopted more restrictions
and started to reconsider the use of these treatments
provided to minors.
House Bill 338 (HB338) amends Alaska's Code of Civil
Procedure by allowing recovery of damages against
physicians who perform a procedure on minors that
result in injury. Some of these surgical procedures
are irreversible. HB338 focuses on the importance of
rigorous medical oversight and informed consent. An
action brought under this section must begin or start
within 20 years after the accrual of the cause of
action.
HB338 is a necessary step towards safeguarding the
well-being of children. It ensures that the medical
community in Alaska adheres to the highest standards
of care and that families can make well-informed
decisions.
2:21:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD presented the sectional analysis for HB
338 [included in the committee packet], which read as follows
[original punctuation provided]:
Section 1: This section amends the Alaska Code of
Civil Procedure, AS 09.10.055(b), by adding a new
exception to allow recovery of damages under Section
3, which relates to gender transition procedures
performed on minors.
Section 2: This section amends AS 09.55.549(f), which
deals with the limitation on noneconomic damages in
certain cases. The amendment specifies that the
limitation does not apply if the damages resulted from
reckless or intentional misconduct or from an action
brought under the newly proposed
Section 3. Section 3: This section adds AS 09.65.175
to establish claims for recovery of damages against a
physician for any injury or condition suffered by the
procedure. The action must be commenced within 20
years after the accrual of the cause of action.
Section 4: This section specifies that the Act takes
effect immediately.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD noted that she had reached out to numerous
statewide experts who are in support of the bill; however, they
said that the Alaska State Medical Board had threatened to
revoke their licenses during the COVID-19 Pandemic and felt that
they could be targeted for coming forward.
CHAIR VANCE opened invited testimony.
2:23:34 PM
STEPHANIE WINN, representing self, gave invited testimony during
the hearing on HB 338. She informed the committee that she is a
licensed marriage and family therapist in the state of Oregon
but is testifying on her own behalf in favor of the bill. As a
left leaning therapist who was once trained to provide gender
affirming care, she said she began to pivot the moment she
realized that people were being harmed by this approach. She
said she recognized that it was her ethical duty to listen to
"detransitioners" and those with painful regrets and
complications from drugs and surgeries that do not deserve to be
called experimental. She added that countless colleagues share
her concerns, whether publicly vocal or not. Since she first
began to change her stance in 2020, an abundance of evidence has
emerged supporting this position, including the publication of
numerous books, peer reviewed articles, and systematic evidence
reviews. She added that more whistleblowers have sounded the
alarm, and European countries have changed trajectories,
recommending a cautious attitude that provides therapy before
life altering medical procedures, and prioritizes the lifelong
health span of the patient. She opined that in 2024, physicians
have no excuse for eschewing reasonable caution, dismissing
testimonies of harmed and aggrieved parents, abandoning the
Hippocratic principle of nonmaleficence in medicine, and
disregarding the growing body of evidence that pediatric sex
trait modification is the most unconscionable medical scandal of
this time. She stated that HB 338 ensures justice for patients
and families who have been harmed by unscrupulous doctors who
have the hubris to ignore their conscience as well as the
evidence. She opined that medical professionals should take
well established facts about well-established psychology into
account and decline to provide treatments that are likely to do
more harm than good in the long run. She proceeded to list the
potential physical consequences of sex trait modification
procedures.
2:27:52 PM
IVAN ABDOUCH, PhD, representing self, retired associate
professor emeritus at the University of Nebraska Medical Center,
gave invited testimony during the hearing on HB 338. He
acknowledged that people on all sides of this issue want what's
best for these kids; however, they disagree on what's best:
medicate and operate, or wait until adulthood. He agreed with
the latter. He shared that he had come before the committee to
offer his perspective after 30 years in the business, which says
that medical and surgical gender transition in children and
adolescents should never be done. He made clear the following
misconception: medical and surgical treatment is for gender
dysphoria, not to address the transgender state per se. He
requested that the committee members keep the following three
facts in the forefront of their deliberation: there are not
current, generally accepted standards of care; no one can
determine with certainty the gender trajectory of a child or
adolescent for their lifetime; the danger of that incorrect
selection is amplified by the fact that treatment effects are
irreversible, and the unwanted effects are lifelong. He urged
policy makers to ask and answer the following question: What is
an acceptable number or children who experience irreversible
harm of lifelong effects due to erroneous medical or surgical
management? He submitted that the least unsafe management is
counseling by a competent therapist. He said please don't let
misdirected beliefs supersede safety.
2:32:00 PM
ARII DEWOLF, representing self, public policy professional, gave
invited testimony during the hearing on HB 338. He shared his
background as a gay, half black, Jewish conservative, adding
that "[his] story is America's story." He commented on the
removal of the human individual in medicine. He expressed
concern that big politics and big money have joined forces to
undermine the rights of individual Americans who are ascending
in the next generation. He opined that people cannot discover
who they are when there is a pipeline into medicalization,
pharmaceuticals, and surgical interventions. He emphasized the
importance of remembering why this country was founded, the
principles of the individual, and common sense.
2:36:24 PM
MATT SHARP, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom, gave
invited testimony during the hearing on HB 338. He noted that
the Alliance Defending Freedom serves as co-counsel with the
State of Alabama, defending its law that protects children from
dangerous gender transition drugs and surgeries. Children who
experience discomfort with their biologicals sex need access to
compassionate, effective mental healthcare, he said. However,
activists and profit driven gender clinics have deceived
children and parents alike into believing that unnatural, life
altering, and even permanently sterilizing puberty blockers,
hormones and surgeries are the solution to their struggle. He
pointed out that laws have long protected children from things
that society has deemed harmful, or that a child lacks the
maturity and experience to handle. He questioned how a child
that lacks the maturity to sign a contract, vote, purchase
alcohol, or get a tattoo could be mature enough to consent to
experimental, potentially irreversible medical procedures that
can lead to permanent sterilization. He added that court
rulings have held that states have a compelling interest in
protecting the physical and psychological wellbeing of minors.
As a result, Alaska can limit the freedom of children to choose
for themselves in making important, affirmative choices with
potentially serious consequences. He cited research that swayed
England's national health service, along with health authorities
in Sweden and Finland, to stop using puberty blockers and
hormones to treat gender dysphoric youth in clinical settings.
Based on this evidence, he reported that 24 states have enacted
laws like HB 338 to protect children from these practices.
Instead, they are prioritizing counseling and therapy for
children who express distress over their biological sex. He
referenced recent decisions by appellate courts, as well as the
U.S. Supreme Court, that allow these laws to be upheld to
protect children's health and safety.
2:42:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD noted that none of the invited testifiers
had been paid to share these opinions.
CHAIR VANCE sought questions from committee members.
2:42:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether the testifiers had met any
happy transgender ("trans") children who do not regret their
decisions.
2:43:59 PM
DR. ABDOUCH cautioned against using the term "transgender"
because it's hard to know with certainty whether a child is
transgender and/or gender dysphoric. He added that he had seen
many children that were dissatisfied or regretful over their
decisions.
MS. WINN noted that she lives in Portland where there is a
"showiness" about trans pride. she questioned whether there is
evidence that any transient feelings of joy, happiness, or
euphoria some of which could be placebo or the effect of mood-
altering substances outweigh the impact of lost fertility,
increased risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, Alzheimer's,
dementia, the inability to have children, and a greatly reduced
dating pool. She added that as a therapist, she must think
beyond face value to the long-term developmental trajectory of
the individual.
MR. DEWOLF said he had transsexual family members and friends
who are no longer [alive], whether by lifestyle or what happened
to their bodies. He shared that a gender clinic is being built
to help people who have experienced harm because there are
enough that have been harmed by it.
MR. SHARP responded that ultimately, subjective feelings are not
what the legislature looks at. Instead, he urged the
legislature to consider evidence and other systematic reviews in
deciding the best policies for Alaska.
2:49:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER asked whether it's the gender
reassignment procedure or the opinion of the medical
professional that puts the child at risk.
DR. ABDOUCH answered, "both." He reflected on his 30-year
practice in the transgender world with a multi-disciplinary
group of psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors, and allied
health people who would not treat anyone under the age of 25.
He explained that the procedures carry significant risk beyond
the usual surgical risk because it attempts to treat a
psychological problem with medical or surgical treatment.
MS. WINN commented on the power of the authority held by medical
professionals. She agreed that the answer is "both," and
acknowledged the emotional weight of a professional endorsing a
specific treatment.
DR. ABDOUCH advised using the terms "trans" and "experimental
treatment" with caution, opting instead for "untested."
2:55:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER shared his understanding that a small
percentage of babies are born hermaphroditic or with a
significant genital malformation. He asked whether treating
those [anatomic distortions] would fall under gender transition
procedure or whether it would be classified as some other
medical procedure.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD said that is not included in the bill and
shared her understanding that those [distortions] are very rare.
MR. ABDOUCH clarified that anatomic distortions are an entirely
different conversation.
2:56:46 PM
MS. WINN informed the committee that she had met with many
people with sexual development disorders. She emphasized that
the disordered sexual development (DSD) community is not
thrilled about being brought into this discussion.
CHAIR VANCE sought closing comments from the bill sponsor.
2:58:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD stated that children are not meant for
unintended body mutilation. She opined that anyone who pushes
for their children to have breasts or genitalia cut off, or
given hormone blockers, should be held accountable. She
characterized the procedures as child abuse worthy of criminal
charges.
CHAIR VANCE announced that HB 183 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 386 - Transmittal Letter v.A.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 386 |
| HB 386 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 386 |
| HB 386 - Sectional Analysis v.A.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 386 |
| HB 386 - Highlights v.A.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 386 |
| HB 338 - Sponsor Statement 4.2.24.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 338 |
| HB 338 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 338 |
| HB 338 Sectional Analysis 4.2.24.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 338 |
| HB 338 - Zero Fiscal Impact Statement.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 338 |
| CSHB 105 - Sponsor Statement Parental Rights TL House.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| CSHB 105 - v.S.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| CSHB 105 - (EDC) Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| CSHB 105 - (EDC) Summary of Changes.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| CSHB 105 - (EDC)-EED-PEF-4-27-23.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| CSHB 105 - (EDC)-EED-FP-4-27-23.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 105 - Proposed CS v.O.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 386 - PowerPoint Presentation.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 386 |
| Judiciary CS to HB 105 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |
| HB 338 - Supporting Documents.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 338 |
| CSHB 105 - Sectional Analysis v.O.pdf |
HJUD 4/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 |