Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 106
03/11/2010 08:00 AM House STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB251 | |
| HB349 | |
| HB336 | |
| HB400 | |
| HB348 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 336 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 400 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 348 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 251 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 336-ELECTRIC & TELEPHONE COOPERATIVES' VOTING
8:22:29 AM
CHAIR LYNN announced that the next order of business was HOUSE
BILL NO. 336, "An Act relating to electronic voting procedures
for electric and telephone cooperatives; and providing for an
effective date."
8:22:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 336, Version 26-1458\R, as a work draft.
There being no objection, Version R was before the committee.
8:23:05 AM
NANCY MANLY, Staff, Representative Bob Lynn, Alaska State
Legislature, introduced HB 336 on behalf of the sponsor, the
House State Affairs Standing Committee, which is chaired by
Representative Lynn. She said HB 336 would put into statute the
ability for telephone or electric cooperatives to allow members
to vote by electronic transmission, as specified by the
cooperatives' by-laws. She relayed that the proposed
legislation was filed at the urging of cooperatives around the
state.
MS. MANLY explained that currently cooperatives may vote only in
person or via the postal service, a method which is outdated and
could be having a negative impact on member participation in
elections and other important matters. Passing HB 336 would
permit electronic transmission, but only if approved by each
cooperative's by-laws. The bill would not make electronic
transmission voting mandatory.
MS. MANLY noted that Matanuska Telephone Association members
have already voted to adopt a by-law allowing electronic
transmission voting. All it and other cooperatives need now is
for the legislature to amend the statute to allow this type of
voting.
8:24:24 AM
BILL STEYER, Director, Government Relations/Corporation
Communications, Chugach Electric Association, Inc., related that
Chugach Electric Association is a member-owned electric
cooperative whose members have already voted to amend the
Chugach Electric Association by-laws to allow electronic voting.
Mr. Steyer said the term "electronic transmission" is broad,
which is why the phrase "as specified by the cooperative" was
added in version R. The intent, he said, is to allow each
cooperative to set up voting procedures that work for that
organization. He said Chugach Electric Association's plan is to
allow members to vote via the Internet, but not to send a text
message vote on the day of the annual meeting. In response to
Representative Johnson, Mr. Steyer offered his understanding
that if an organization wanted to allow voting via a facsimile
machine, it could do so [under HB 336]; although he said he is
not sure that would be a form that Chugach Electric Association
would incorporate into its own election procedures.
8:29:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON expressed his support of the proposed
legislation, but said he is concerned about security. He stated
that as a member of a cooperative, he will monitor this issue.
He emphasized the importance of getting genuine, member votes.
8:30:29 AM
CHAIR LYNN said he shares the same concern. He said he does not
want a member to be identified as having voted for one candidate
over another.
8:30:44 AM
MR. STEYER responded that that is a very legitimate concern that
needs to be addressed as soon as the cooperative chooses a
vendor for its electronic voting system. He stated that his
goal every year is to "have a process that can survive any
challenge," which is instrumental in adopting electronic voting.
He opined that no organization should pursue electronic voting
unless it can ensure the elections are secure.
8:31:57 AM
MR. STEYER, in response to Representative Gatto, said he knows
of a couple cooperatives in the Lower 48 that issue both a
member number and control number electronically; however, he
said he does not know if a member's vote would be discounted if
he/she did not submit both numbers at the time of voting.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTO expressed concern that people will find a
way to scam the system. He noted that one person out of ten is
a victim of identity theft.
8:33:56 AM
MR. STEYER said when Chugach Electric Association began in 1948,
people voted in person. In the 1980s, people could,
alternatively, vote by mail. He said he was instrumental in
developing a three-step process by which to ensure the security
of the vote-by-mail system. He said in order to do that he had
to think about ways in which a person could scam the system. He
related that the vote-by-mail system has been successful for the
last 20 years. Now that cooperatives are on the verge of taking
another step to electronic voting, it will be important to be
equally diligent. Mr. Steyer said, "I can't answer every
question about the 'what ifs' and what might happen yet, but I
would hope, certainly before we would conduct this process, that
we would know those answers and be comfortable."
MR. STEYER, in response to Representative Gatto, talked about
the outgoing process, over which he said there is not total
control. He emphasized that the control lies in the return,
when the roster is checked against the ballots returned. He
said voting electronically would be just one option. Currently,
99 percent of Chugach Electric Association members cast their
ballots by mail. He offered further details related to voting
accuracy.
8:39:37 AM
MR. STEYER, in response to Representative Gatto, restated that
Chugach Electric Association allows each of its members only one
vote; however, he said it is true that sometimes people may cast
two ballots. He said this happens most usually because the
machine used inadvertently stuffs two ballots into an envelope.
He said this happens only a half a dozen times each year, out of
the 70,000 packets mailed. If both ballots are sent in, the
election committee makes the decision as to which one to choose.
Most of the time the two ballots are identical. In response to
a follow-up question from Representative Gatto, he said one
ballot is given to each member. A single person can have a
membership, a married couple can have a membership, and one
ballot will be given to one of two people who are cohabitating.
Commercial customers with more than one location will still
receive only one membership. Mr. Steyer said different
committees have had varying philosophies regarding how to deal
with multiple ballots from one member, and they set procedure
accordingly. He reiterated that only one ballot will be counted
from each member, and it is up to the election committee whether
it is the first or last.
8:44:56 AM
MR. STEYER, in response to Representative Gruenberg, offered his
understanding that no cooperative in Alaska is currently
utilizing electronic voting, although members of the Matanuska
Telephone Association, Inc. (MTA) and Chugach Electric
Association have voted to change their organizations' by-laws to
permit electronic voting if state statute is changed.
8:45:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG directed attention to language on page
1, lines 9 and 10, which read as follows:
except that electronic transmission may not be the
only allowed option for voting.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG continued as follows:
In view of your testimony that you already have two
methods of voting - by mail and in person - the thing
that I'm concerned about is - at least under the
wording of this - the two methods that could be
allowed are in person and electronic. That would
effectively nullify the intent of this, which is to
allow a method that people do really use to be the
alternative for electronic voting.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said he is prepared to offer an
amendment that would address that problem, perhaps by changing
language to specify that one of the options must be to vote by
mail. He pointed out that many people in his district do not
own computers.
8:46:35 AM
MR. STEYER proffered that the advantage of electronic
transmission is not only convenience, but also the money that
cooperatives would save for each ballot that they do not have to
pay to mail. He suggested that there may be an evolution
regarding ballots, such as occurred with the application for the
permanent fund dividend, and he said he would not want to
support an amendment that may precluded cooperatives from
cutting back on the amount of mail they send. He said he does
not foresee Chugach Electric Association ever putting itself in
the position of not accommodating people who do not have
computers and cannot physically get to a meeting, and he said he
is certain Chugach Electric Association would be challenged by
its members if they do not like a choice that has been made.
8:50:17 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said it is not his intent to preclude
Chugach Electric Association from going through the evolution
that Mr. Steyer is describing. He echoed the concerns of
Representatives Johnson and Gatto regarding security issues. He
directed attention to language on the second page of a fiscal
note from the from the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA),
which read as follows:
The Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) has limited
jurisdiction that includes regulating the rates and
services of non-exempt electric and telephone
cooperatives. See AS 42.05.141. With the exception
of deregulation elections governed by AS 42.05.712,
RCA jurisdiction does not extend to membership voting
procedures. Members of electric and telephone
cooperatives seeking to enforce the electronic voting
procedures proposed by this legislation would need to
pursue judicial recourse rather than RCA intervention.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said that is a cumbersome method and
courts are not as familiar with the way cooperatives operate as
is the RCA. He said he is prepared to offer a provision that
would put the jurisdiction over this issue in the RCA.
8:52:41 AM
MR. STEYER responded that currently the RCA today does not have
jurisdiction over Chugach Electric Association's elections and
if a member has a problem with an election, he/she takes it to
the court system; therefore, Representative Gruenberg's
suggestion would be "a pretty dramatic departure from that and
one that we would need more deliberation on I'd have to say."
8:53:52 AM
MR. STEYER, in response to Chair Lynn, said that in the last
three years' elections, an average of 21 percent of Chugach
Electric Association's members voted, which he said is a higher
average than many other cooperative elections. He related that
his board of directors is interested in this legislation as a
means by which to encourage more people to vote and to get
younger people involved. He said he asked the aforementioned
organizations in the Lower 48 whether they have increased member
voting and have attracted younger members as a result of
electronic transmission, and whether this means of voting has
proved to be secure. He said the organizations reported no real
increase in voting and have not done a study to ascertain
whether there has been an increase in younger member
participation; however, the organizations told him that they had
had no problems related to security.
8:56:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN suggested that if an organization
already offers a method of paying bills on line, it would not be
too big of a jump to also allow those people to vote
electronically. He talked about the savings from not having to
mail out statements, and compared that to the savings from not
having to mail out ballots.
MR. STEYER confirmed that Chugach Electric Association currently
does offer a method of paying bills on line and doing other
business transactions on line, and he said some of the
cooperative's members have stated a preference to do everything
electronically. He spoke again about the evolution to
electronic transactions and the need to secure such transactions
before offering them.
8:58:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN surmised that electronic voting would be
even more appreciated in rural areas where members of smaller
cooperatives may be spread out over a larger geographical area.
He predicted [electronic transmission] is something that will be
seen much more in the future.
9:00:07 AM
CHAIR LYNN, after ascertaining that there was no one else who
wished to testify, closed public testimony.
9:00:20 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON expressed interest in finding out from
Legislative Legal and Research Services whether the penalty for
voter fraud in cooperative elections is similar to that in other
elections. In response to Chair Lynn, he indicated that
although this matter is of interest to him, it probably would
not [be a matter for which he would want the bill held longer in
committee].
9:02:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON said she does not want to hold up the
bill, but said she would like to know if there is any kind of
penalty [proposed within the bill].
9:03:12 AM
MR. STEYER reiterated that cooperatives are member-owned,
private organizations, and he said he is unaware of criminal
penalties for fraud in a cooperative election. Furthermore, he
said he is unaware of what penalties are in place for fraud
within a municipal or state election.
9:04:03 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON emphasized that cooperatives need to
think about what they would do if fraud occurs through the use
of electronic transmissions during an election.
9:04:29 AM
MR. STEYER said in the last 24 years of his involvement in
Chugach Electric Association's election processes, there has
always been the prospect for fraud, but there has not yet been a
case of fraud.
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON said she thinks the age of computers
and electronic transmittal brings with it the chance for fraud,
and she again encouraged cooperatives to give the matter of
penalties consideration before they are necessary.
CHAIR LYNN offered his understanding that Mr. Steyer had said
cooperatives have no clear avenue regarding penalties. He
stated, "The issue is there whether we pass this bill or do not
pass this bill."
9:08:07 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON said he thinks having a criminal penalty
alleviates the chance that people will do fraudulent acts on a
lark. He said he thinks the cooperatives will be stringent in
ensuring their systems are set up well and their elections
remain valid. He reiterated that on this point, he would like
to get more information, but he said he is comfortable with the
court being there as the remedy for voter fraud in the mean
time.
9:09:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON said as the evolution occurs, issues
arise. He said it is not up to the cooperatives to determine
whether fraud is a criminal offense; that is up to the
legislature. He said what is at stake today compared to what
was at stake years ago is incomparable; the value of businesses
has increased exponentially, which in turn increases the desire
to commit fraudulent acts. Representative Johnson said laws
serve two purposes: outlining what can and cannot be done and
serving as a deterrent. He said he does not think [fraud] is
the issue of the proposed legislation; HB 336 is proposing
another method of voting. He expressed support for HB 336, and
encouraged the legislature to keep its eye on the issue of
fraud.
9:12:19 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN said there is a procedure by which
people can submit an electronic signature, which may be a
deterrent to someone committing fraud.
9:13:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG noted that AS 15.56.040 addresses voter
misconduct in the first degree and AS 15.56.050 addresses voter
misconduct in the second degree. He said both statutes apply to
governmental elections, but not to cooperative or corporate
elections. He concurred that [addressing the issue of fraud] is
a good idea, but is not part of the proposed bill.
9:14:43 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to report the proposed committee
substitute (CS), Version 26-LS1458\R, out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, CSHB 336(STA) was reported out of the
House State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 01 HB0400A.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 02 2-26-10 HB 400 Sponsor Statement PDF.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 03 HB400-DOA-DAS-03-05-10.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 04 HB 400 Sample of Emergency Awards from Fiscal Year 2009.docx.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 05 HB400 VCCB Awards 2009 graphs - 1.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 06 HB400 VCCB Awards 2009 graphs - 2.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| HB336-Fiscal Note-CED-RCA-3-3-10.pdf |
HCRA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 336 |
| 07 HB400 VCCB Claims Chart.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 08 HB400 VCCB Emergency Awards FACTS (1).pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 09 HB 400 VCCB Emergency awards FACTS (2).pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 400 |
| 00 3-10-10 HB 336 Changes from Version A to Version R.doc.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 336 |
| 01 3-10-10 CS for HB 336 STA Version R.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 336 |
| 02 HB0336A.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 336 |
| HB 336 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 336 |
| HB 336 letters of support.pdf |
HCRA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 336 |
| 01 HB 251 Version R.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| 02 HB 251 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| 03 HB 251 LETTER Alaska Towing Assn.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| HB251-CED-COM-3-8-10.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| HB251-DOT&PF-COM-3-8-10.pdf |
HSTA 3/9/2010 8:00:00 AM HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 251 |
| 01 Electronic Bill Packet for HB 349.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 349 |
| 02 HB349-DHSS-SPC-03-08-10.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 349 |
| 01 HB0348A.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 348 |
| 02 HB 348 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 348 |
| 03 HB 348 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 348 |
| 04 HB348-DOA-DOPLR-03-08-10.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 348 |
| 05 HB 348 Legal Memo.PDF |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 348 |
| 06 HB 348 Personnel Board stories.PDF |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 348 |
| 07 HB 348 relevant statutes.PDF |
HSTA 3/11/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 348 |