Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
04/16/2024 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB68 | |
| HB190 | |
| HB330 | |
| HB173 | |
| HB362 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 173 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 330 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 256 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 362 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 190 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 68 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 330-RESTRICT PRISONER ACCESS DIGITAL DEVICES
3:55:50 PM
CHAIR SHAW announced the next order of business would be HOUSE
BILL NO. 330, "An Act relating to the use and possession of
electronic devices by prisoners."
3:56:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY moved to adopt Amendment 1 to HB 330,
labeled 33-LS0761\H.2, C. Radford, 4/8/24, which read:
Page 3, line 16, following "purpose":
Insert "or as a substitution for in-person visitation,
receiving mail, or other in-person communication"
REPRESENTATIVE WRIGHT objected for the purpose of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY explained that Amendment 1 would ensure
that prisoners rights are protected by allowing them to have the
option of receiving in-person visitation or mail and that an
electronic device would not replace any sort of physical
correspondence.
REPRESENTATIVE WRIGHT asked to hear from the bill sponsor.
3:57:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SARAH VANCE, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor of HB 330, expressed apprehension to the wording of the
proposed amendment and said it could inadvertently restrict any
sort of visitation if electronic visitation is the only
available form of correspondence.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY explained that the word "or" in Amendment 1
leaves the use of different types of visitation as options.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE responded that the Department of
Corrections (DOC) had concerns about physical mail being
transmitted from prisons and said it could be problematic to put
these rights into statute if they already pose a consternation
to DOC.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY said she took great concern with DOC
wanting to restrict physical mail correspondence.
4:01:26 PM
APRIL WILKERSON, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Corrections,
explained that DOC currently has contraband issues that come
through the mail; however, it was not the intent to replace 100
percent by utilizing the tablets for mail services. She
described it as an enhancement that would be one option of many.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY stated her intention was that the amendment
would strengthen in statute that it could still be allowed.
MS. WILKERSON replied that DOC did not intend to eliminate
current processes by utilizing the tablets. She reiterated that
the intention was to enhance current operations by using the
tablet for video visitations or streaming mail. She clarified
that there would still be mail that would need to be copied and
delivered.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY stressed that she did not want tablets used
as a substitute for receiving an in-person visitation or mail
and other communications.
4:03:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD stated that she was "not a fan" of HB 330.
She asked what level offenders would qualify to use tablets.
MS. WILKERSON explained that there would be a limited aspect of
the tablets. They are on a dedicated network and do not connect
to the Internet, and in no way able to send e-mails and the
like.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD restated that she sought to know at what
level offenders have access to a tablet.
MS. WILKERSON said the intent was to get tablets in the hands of
any offender and it is not based on conviction levels. She
assured that security is being looked into currently and the
tablet would not allow the offender to utilize it for criminal
enterprise or connect inappropriately with victims.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD emphasized her concern over offenders
having tablets and the possible ramifications.
MS. WILKERSON replied that solid infrastructures are being
followed to ensure the security of the system, and she offered
to share information from the vendor about their security
network. She added that everything that would come through the
tablet would be tracked, monitored, and recorded.
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD asked whether the tablet would be safer
than paper mail.
MS. WILKERSON clarified that on a tablet, mail generates a
different picture than a manual process.
4:08:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WRIGHT maintained his objection.
4:08:30 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representative Story voted in favor
of Amendment 1 to HB 330. Representatives Carpenter, C.
Johnson, Allard, Wright, and Shaw voted against it. Therefore,
Amendment 1 failed by a vote of 1-5.
4:09:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY moved to adopt Amendment 2 to HB 330,
labeled 33-LS0761\H.3, C. Radford, 4/8/24, which read:
Page 3, line 17, following "kind":
Insert ";
(4) allow a state correctional facility
operated by the state to charge a fee for electronic
mail or electronic visitation services"
Page 3, following line 17:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 2. The uncodified law of the State of
Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read:
APPLICABILITY. AS 33.30.015(a)(4), enacted by sec. 1
of this Act, applies to services used by a prisoner on
or after the effective date of this Act."
REPRESENTATIVE WRIGHT requested to hear from the bill sponsor.
4:10:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated she agreed that she does not want
exorbitant fees imposed on the offenders; it is a matter of what
is fair and balanced. She offered her belief that if Amendment
2 were adopted, it would limit flexibility as the department
works through the pilot program.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY expressed concern about families on limited
budgets with loved ones who are incarcerated.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referred to a video that was played during
the introduction of HB 330 and recapped that there were
companies that work in partnership with the vendors of the
tablet who would fund educational opportunities at no expense to
the inmate. She noted there are a variety of options available
for different services.
4:13:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER commented that he did not want to see
inmates or family members getting charged large fees, but there
was value in having a convenience user fee to participate in the
system that would otherwise be free if they were local. He
opined that more family interactions with prisoners could occur
with the tablet. He stated opposition to Amendment 2.
4:14:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD opined that criminals should not be
rewarded in prison and should continue to pay their debts to
society. When they are released is something different, she
said. She restated that she did not support Amendment 2.
4:14:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY requested to hear from Ms. Wilkerson
regarding those who do not have funds to provide services but
are charge fees.
MS. WILKERSON expounded on the inmate telephone system and how
it is written into a contract. She further noted that there are
a number of free calls per week.
4:16:45 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Story voted in
favor of Amendment 2 to HB 330. Representatives Wright,
Carpenter, C. Johnson, Allard, and Shaw voted against it.
Therefore, Amendment 2 failed to be adopted by a vote of 1-5.
4:17:20 PM
CHAIR SHAW opened public testimony on HB 330.
4:17:41 PM
DON HABEGAR, Community Coordinator, Juneau Reentry Coalition,
testified in support HB 330 on behalf of himself and the
coalition and opined that it is a much-needed piece of
legislation. He noted the need for access for the community to
a facility and certain things prevent this. The reentry process
must have necessary community support, he said. He acknowledged
concerns about security, but advanced technology better
safeguards the community, and he encouraged the passage of HB
330.
4:20:15 PM
MARSHA OSS, Reentry Coordinator, Fairbanks Reentry Coalition,
said she supported the previous testifier's statements. She
added that HB 330 would allow DOC increased access to technology
inside Alaska's prisons and allow the department to provide
services to more individuals, which would help address DOC's
staffing challenges. She thanked Representative Vance for
introducing the bill.
4:22:16 PM
CHRIS DIMOND, Western States Carpenters Union, testified in
support of HB 330. He said the type of curriculum would give
inmates who are about to be released a pathway to an actual
career that could help them. The end goal is to get someone to
stay out of prison when they are released, and these tools and
technology should continue to be looked into, he opined.
4:23:23 PM
CHAIR SHAW, after ascertaining no one else wished to testify,
closed public testimony on HB 330.
4:23:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE gave closing comments. She recognized many
of the concerns surrounding the proposed legislation but said
she added tighter restrictions. She noted the difficulties
prisoners endure, such as separation from family, and that there
must be better reentry processes. She pointed out that page 3
in the bill addressed many concerns. She said there is a
responsibility from the state to help rehabilitate prisoners so
they are not a burden to communities and to trust that the
legislature would make the best decisions moving forward.
4:26:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WRIGHT moved to report HB 330 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes.
4:27:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ALLARD objected.
4:27:42 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Story, Wright,
Carpenter, C. Johnson, and Shaw voted in favor of moving HB 330
out of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. Representative Allard voted against
it. Therefore, HB 330 was reported out of the House State
Affairs Standing Committee by a vote of 5-1.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB190 Alaska Sunset Commission Presentation 3.12.2024.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| CSHB 190 Sectional Analysis Version B.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190 - Sponsor Statement Version S.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190 Verison S.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190 Fiscal Note - Office of Gov.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 190 Amendment 5 Story HSTA.pdf |
HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| SB 68 Fiscal Note DEC 3.7.24.pdf |
HSTA 4/4/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
SB 68 |
| SB 68 Fiscal Note DNR 3.7.24.pdf |
HSTA 4/4/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
SB 68 |
| SB 68 Sectional Analysis, version D.A.pdf |
HSTA 4/4/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
SB 68 |
| SB 68 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 4/4/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
SB 68 |
| Difference between SB 68 and HB 287.pdf |
HSTA 4/4/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 287 SB 68 |
| SB 68 Amendment 1 HSTA.pdf |
HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
SB 68 |
| SB 68 Amendment 2 HSTA.pdf |
HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
SB 68 |
| HB0173A.2.19.24.PDF |
HSTA 3/5/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB173.VerA.SectionalAnalysis.2.19.24.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB173.VerA.SponsorStatement.2.19.24.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Ver A - US Dept of Labor. Dollar Threshold Amount for Contract Coverage.3.21.24.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Ver A - ABC State Prevailing Wage Laws Map 3.21.24.jpg |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Ver A - Newsline ABC Members Survey.3.21.24.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Fiscal Note DOLabor.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB173.VerA.Letter of Support and Resolution RS 24-042 MatSu Borough 4.9.24.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB173.VerA.Letter of Support NFIB 4.9.24.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB173.VerA.Letter of Support Wasilla Chamber 4.9.24.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB173.VerA.SupportingLetter AML 4.9.24.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 - Opposition Letter Alaska District Council of Laborers.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 - Opposition Letter IBEW Local 1547.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 - Opposition Letter Operating Engineers Local 302.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 - Opposition Letter Western States Regional Council of Carpenters.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 330 Supporting Document - Improving Public Safety.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Supporting Document - Inspire_Tablet_Program_Write_Up.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Supporting Document - Not a luxury.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Supporting Document - RAND.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Supporting Document - Research in Support of Digital Access (2).pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Version H Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Version H Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Version H.pdf |
HSTA 3/26/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/2/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB362 Support Document - 18 USC 4006_ Subsistence for prisoners.pdf |
HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/30/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf |
HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/30/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB362 Sponsor Statement 03.28.24.pdf |
HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/30/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB362 Support Document - UFCR Medicare Rate Limitation.pdf |
HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/30/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB362 Support Document - Washington State Medical Contracts for services.pdf |
HSTA 4/9/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/11/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/30/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 362 Fiscal Note DOC.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/30/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 362 |
| HB 190 - Amendment 4 Carpenter HSTA.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB 330 Amendment 1 Carrick HSTA.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 330 Amendment 2 Carrick HSTA.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 330 |
| HB 190 - Amendment 4 Carpenter HSTA.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 190 |
| HB173 - Opposition Letter Teamsters Local 959.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |