Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
04/08/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB359 | |
| HB393 | |
| HB195 | |
| HB251 | |
| HB329 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 195 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 251 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 329 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 359 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 393 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 329-AQUATIC FARM AND HATCHERY LEASES
1:59:14 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 329, "An Act relating to state tideland leases;
relating to geoduck seed transfers; and relating to aquatic
farming or related hatchery operation site leases." [Before the
committee was CSHB 329(FSH).]
1:59:41 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:59 p.m. to 2:03 p.m.
2:03:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SARAH VANCE, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, presented CSHB 329(FSH). She paraphrased from the
sponsor statement [copy included in the committee packet], which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
House Bill 329 promises to provide a significant boost
to Alaska's aquatic farming industry, known as
mariculture. This legislation has the potential to
bolster the state's economy, help preserve its
environment, and enrich its coastal communities by
streamlining the tideland lease process and extending
lease durations to up to 25 years.
Mariculture, the cultivation of marine shellfish and
aquatic plants, stands as a beacon of sustainable
economic growth for Alaska. Mariculture not only
generates employment opportunities across various
sectors but also injects vitality into coastal
communities. The industry fosters commerce, both
domestically and internationally, while nurturing a
vibrant ecosystem in Alaska's pristine waters.
One of the key features of HB 329 is the
simplification of the lease acquisition process.
Currently, prospective mariculturists endure a lengthy
multi-agency application and review process which
generally takes years to complete. This bureaucratic
hurdle often deters potential farmers from entering
the industry. HB 329 aims to lessen this burden by
enabling quicker access to tidelands, enabling farmers
to concentrate more on farming and less on paperwork.
Moreover, the extension of the lease duration to 25
years provides for long-term stability for
mariculturists and encourages sustained investment in
the industry. This stability is crucial for the
development of robust mariculture operations, which
contribute significantly to Alaska's economic
diversification.
The environmental benefits of mariculture are also
noteworthy. Shellfish and seaweed play a vital role in
maintaining water quality by filtering out pollutants
and excess nutrients. They provide essential habitat
for diverse marine life and help mitigate ocean
acidificationa pressing concern.
Furthermore, mariculture aligns with Alaska's rich
cultural heritage, complementing existing traditions
and customs in coastal communities. By promoting the
sustainable utilization of marine resources,
mariculture strengthens the bond between Alaskans and
their natural surroundings.
With HB 329 paving the way for a more supportive
regulatory framework, Alaska's mariculture industry is
poised to flourish, creating jobs, stimulating
commerce, and safeguarding the state's precious marine
ecosystems. As stakeholders rally behind this
initiative, Alaska's coastal communities stand to reap
the benefits of a thriving and sustainable mariculture
sector for generations to come.
2:06:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE pointed out that the Alaska Mariculture
Alliance is an organization of growers, and the organization has
requested that the proposed legislation provide a first
preference for growers to obtain leases. She explained that
currently leases are made for 10 years, but it takes several
years for farmers to see a harvest; therefore, this would allow
farmers first preference after their leases are up, giving them
the assurance that sites would not be lost. It would also allow
new leases to be up to 20 years, as this would allow for
longevity of the farms. She added that having longer leases
would help these farmers to obtain loans.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referenced the amendments that were adopted
in the House Special Committee on Fisheries, including a
provision to allow for the transfer of geoduck seeds between
hatcheries and aquatic farms. She added that the amendment also
includes the Aleutian Islands in the proposed legislation, as it
had been left out of the original law. She added that geoducks
thrive in this area. She noted that another amendment that was
adopted would eliminate the need for property appraisals, as
this would simplify the process for the commissioner. She
discussed how this would also consolidate language in the
statute.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE directed attention to Section 4 of the
proposed legislation, which deals with leases for carbon
management purposes. She stated that aquatic farm growers have
the concern that outside companies looking to invest in carbon
sequestration would lease tidelands for an extended period,
leaving the growers without the opportunity to access these
areas. She suggested that an amendment could be made to limit
the amount of tidelands these outside investors could lease.
She expressed the understanding that there is interest in
growing kelp for carbon sequestration, so there could be a dual
purpose, as part of this could be for food. She posed the
question to the committee on how this area of statute could be
shaped going forward, so Alaskan mariculture farmers would be
allowed to have a priority to tidelands to grow food and sustain
the coastal communities. She also asked what areas of tidelands
could be used solely for carbon sequestration. She noted that a
prospective amendment has been used as a placeholder for this
committee to discuss, as the committee deals with leases on a
more regular basis.
2:12:22 PM
PAUL FUHS, President, Alaska Shellfish Growers Association,
expressed support for the proposed legislation, on behalf of the
association. He stated that the bill would clean up unforeseen
issues in statute, as mariculture is a relatively new industry.
He discussed the long maturation rate for geoducks, as a 10-year
lease would be too short for this process. He noted that the
current lease process creates an unstable industry.
2:13:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MEARS requested an explanation of a geoduck
operation.
MR. FUHS explained that geoduck farming is minimally invasive.
He stated that the maximum lease is for 10 acres in the subtidal
zone, so the farms are unseen. He stated that all other fishing
activities could take place on and around the farm. He noted
that carbon sequestration farms are much larger and can take
over the area around the sites. He expressed the understanding
that these operations would exclude local populations from using
these sites. He suggested that only allowing these operations
in remote areas could be a fix to this potential problem.
2:15:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to Sections 3 and 4 of the
proposed legislation on carbon management and carbon
sequestration. He questioned the distinction between these
terms.
MR. FUHS expressed uncertainty. He expressed the understanding
that these terms have the same definition.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER deferred the question to the bill
sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that this is drafting language.
Considering the other carbon legislation, she expressed the
intent in this bill to make sure the leases for growers would be
secured. She stated that the drafter of the legislation
determined the language.
2:16:53 PM
JAKE ALMEIDA, Staff, Representative Sarah Vance, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Vance, prime sponsor of
HB 329, responded that "carbon sequestration" would be the
politically correct term, while "carbon management" is the
legalese.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER remarked on the consistency in the use of
the terms in the proposed bill.
2:17:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BAKER asked what number of current leaseholders
and businesses this would impact. He commented that regarding
other industries, a 20-year lease would be out of the norm.
MR. FUHS responded that, in general, tideland leases are longer
for other businesses, as they can be up to 55 years. He stated
that the short leases do not fit the biology of geoducks. He
stated that lease extension options would also ensure the farms
are operating properly.
2:19:26 PM
KATE DUFAULT, Program Manager, Aquatic Farms Leasing Program,
Division of Mining, Land, and Water, Department of Natural
Resources, responded that the program has currently administered
around 78 aquatic farm-site leases, with 50 percent located in
Southeast Alaska and 30 percent located in Southcentral Alaska.
She added that the remainder are in Kodiak Island and the Alaska
Peninsula. In response to a follow-up question, she stated that
the leases range in size from under 1 acre to 180 acres. She
stated that on average these leases are for 15 to 25 acres.
2:21:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether a shellfish mariculture
lease or carbon sequestration lease would generate more state
revenue and associated economic activity.
MS. DUFAULT stated that there are some rough numbers from the
2022 annual sales, but currently she does not have them. She
added that the sales from shellfish accounted for the bulk of
annual sales. She estimated that shellfish account for around
$1.6 million, while kelp accounted for $270,000 in sales. She
stated that the numbers for 2023 are not yet compiled.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER questioned the fiscal note.
MS. DUFAULT said the fiscal note expresses the numbers in the
thousands, not the millions. In response to a follow-up
question, she stated that the staff time on the fiscal note
would represent the total cost, not the cost per hour.
2:24:04 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that HB 329 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 251 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
| HB 251 Ver A.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
| HB 251 Ver U.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
| HB 251 Explanation of Changes between Version A and Version U.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
| HB 251 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
| HB 251 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
| HB 251 RES Hearing Request 4.2.2024.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
| HB 195 Sponsor Statement v B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
| CSHB 195B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
| HB0195B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Summary of Changes from v. A to B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Sectional Analysis v. B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
| CSHB 195 Sponsor Presentation.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
| HB 329 Sponsor Statement v.D.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 329 |
| CSHB 329B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 329 |
| HB 329 - Sectional Analysis v.D.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 329 |
| HB 195 Supporting Document - CFEC Optimum Numbers Study.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |