Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
04/08/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB359 | |
HB393 | |
HB195 | |
HB251 | |
HB329 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | HB 195 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 251 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 329 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 349 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 359 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 393 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 329-AQUATIC FARM AND HATCHERY LEASES 1:59:14 PM CHAIR MCKAY announced that the next order of business would be CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 329(FSH) "An Act relating to state tideland leases; relating to geoduck seed transfers; and relating to aquatic farming or related hatchery operation site leases." 1:59:41 PM The committee took an at-ease from 1:59 p.m. to 2:03 p.m. 2:03:37 PM REPRESENTATIVE SARAH VANCE, Alaska State Legislature, as prime sponsor, presented CSHB 329(FSH). She paraphrased from the sponsor statement [copy included in the committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: House Bill 329 promises to provide a significant boost to Alaska's aquatic farming industry, known as mariculture. This legislation has the potential to bolster the state's economy, help preserve its environment, and enrich its coastal communities by streamlining the tideland lease process and extending lease durations to up to 25 years. Mariculture, the cultivation of marine shellfish and aquatic plants, stands as a beacon of sustainable economic growth for Alaska. Mariculture not only generates employment opportunities across various sectors but also injects vitality into coastal communities. The industry fosters commerce, both domestically and internationally, while nurturing a vibrant ecosystem in Alaska's pristine waters. One of the key features of HB 329 is the simplification of the lease acquisition process. Currently, prospective mariculturists endure a lengthy multi-agency application and review process which generally takes years to complete. This bureaucratic hurdle often deters potential farmers from entering the industry. HB 329 aims to lessen this burden by enabling quicker access to tidelands, enabling farmers to concentrate more on farming and less on paperwork. Moreover, the extension of the lease duration to 25 years provides for long-term stability for mariculturists and encourages sustained investment in the industry. This stability is crucial for the development of robust mariculture operations, which contribute significantly to Alaska's economic diversification. The environmental benefits of mariculture are also noteworthy. Shellfish and seaweed play a vital role in maintaining water quality by filtering out pollutants and excess nutrients. They provide essential habitat for diverse marine life and help mitigate ocean acidificationa pressing concern. Furthermore, mariculture aligns with Alaska's rich cultural heritage, complementing existing traditions and customs in coastal communities. By promoting the sustainable utilization of marine resources, mariculture strengthens the bond between Alaskans and their natural surroundings. With HB 329 paving the way for a more supportive regulatory framework, Alaska's mariculture industry is poised to flourish, creating jobs, stimulating commerce, and safeguarding the state's precious marine ecosystems. As stakeholders rally behind this initiative, Alaska's coastal communities stand to reap the benefits of a thriving and sustainable mariculture sector for generations to come. 2:06:46 PM REPRESENTATIVE VANCE pointed out that the Alaska Mariculture Alliance is an organization of growers, and the organization has requested that the proposed legislation provide a first preference for growers to obtain leases. She explained that currently leases are made for 10 years, but it takes several years for farmers to see a harvest; therefore, this would allow farmers first preference after their leases are up, giving them the assurance that sites would not be lost. It would also allow new leases to be up to 20 years, as this would allow for longevity of the farms. She added that having longer leases would help these farmers to obtain loans. REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referenced the amendments that were adopted in the House Special Committee on Fisheries, including a provision to allow for the transfer of geoduck seeds between hatcheries and aquatic farms. She added that the amendment also includes the Aleutian Islands in the proposed legislation, as it had been left out of the original law. She added that geoducks thrive in this area. She noted that another amendment that was adopted would eliminate the need for property appraisals, as this would simplify the process for the commissioner. She discussed how this would also consolidate language in the statute. REPRESENTATIVE VANCE directed attention to Section 4 of the proposed legislation, which deals with leases for carbon management purposes. She stated that aquatic farm growers have the concern that outside companies looking to invest in carbon sequestration would lease tidelands for an extended period, leaving the growers without the opportunity to access these areas. She suggested that an amendment could be made to limit the amount of tidelands these outside investors could lease. She expressed the understanding that there is interest in growing kelp for carbon sequestration, so there could be a dual purpose, as part of this could be for food. She posed the question to the committee on how this area of statute could be shaped going forward, so Alaskan mariculture farmers would be allowed to have a priority to tidelands to grow food and sustain the coastal communities. She also asked what areas of tidelands could be used solely for carbon sequestration. She noted that a prospective amendment has been used as a placeholder for this committee to discuss, as the committee deals with leases on a more regular basis. 2:12:22 PM PAUL FUHS, President, Alaska Shellfish Growers Association, expressed support for the proposed legislation, on behalf of the association. He stated that the bill would clean up unforeseen issues in statute, as mariculture is a relatively new industry. He discussed the long maturation rate for geoducks, as a 10-year lease would be too short for this process. He noted that the current lease process creates an unstable industry. 2:13:26 PM REPRESENTATIVE MEARS requested an explanation of a geoduck operation. MR. FUHS explained that geoduck farming is minimally invasive. He stated that the maximum lease is for 10 acres in the subtidal zone, so the farms are unseen. He stated that all other fishing activities could take place on and around the farm. He noted that carbon sequestration farms are much larger and can take over the area around the sites. He expressed the understanding that these operations would exclude local populations from using these sites. He suggested that only allowing these operations in remote areas could be a fix to this potential problem. 2:15:17 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to Sections 3 and 4 of the proposed legislation on carbon management and carbon sequestration. He questioned the distinction between these terms. MR. FUHS expressed uncertainty. He expressed the understanding that these terms have the same definition. REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER deferred the question to the bill sponsor. REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that this is drafting language. Considering the other carbon legislation, she expressed the intent in this bill to make sure the leases for growers would be secured. She stated that the drafter of the legislation determined the language. 2:16:53 PM JAKE ALMEIDA, Staff, Representative Sarah Vance, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Vance, prime sponsor of HB 329, responded that "carbon sequestration" would be the politically correct term, while "carbon management" is the legalese. REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER remarked on the consistency in the use of the terms in the proposed bill. 2:17:39 PM REPRESENTATIVE BAKER asked the number of current leaseholders and businesses this would impact. He commented that regarding other industries, a 20-year lease would be out of the norm. MR. FUHS responded that, in general, tideland leases are longer for other businesses, as they can be up to 55 years. He stated that the short leases do not fit the biology of geoducks. He stated that lease extension options would also ensure the farms are operating properly. 2:19:26 PM KATE DUFAULT, Program Manager, Aquatic Farms Leasing Program, Division of Mining, Land, and Water, Department of Natural Resources, responded that the program has currently administered around 78 aquatic farm-site leases, with 50 percent located in Southeast Alaska and 30 percent located in Southcentral Alaska. She added that the remainder are in Kodiak Island and the Alaska Peninsula. In response to a follow-up question, she stated that the leases range in size from under 1 acre to 180 acres. She stated that on average these leases are for 15 to 25 acres. 2:21:40 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether a shellfish mariculture lease or carbon sequestration lease would generate more state revenue and associated economic activity. MS. DUFAULT stated that there are some rough numbers from the 2022 annual sales, but currently she does not have them. She added that the sales from shellfish accounted for the bulk of annual sales. She estimated that shellfish account for around $1.6 million, while kelp accounted for $270,000 in sales. She stated that the numbers for 2023 are not yet compiled. REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER questioned the fiscal note. MS. DUFAULT said the fiscal note expresses the numbers in the thousands, not the millions. In response to a follow-up question, she stated that the staff time on the fiscal note would represent the total cost, not the cost per hour. 2:24:04 PM CHAIR MCKAY announced that HB 329 was held over.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 251 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
HB 251 Ver A.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
HB 251 Ver U.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
HB 251 Explanation of Changes between Version A and Version U.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
HB 251 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
HB 251 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
HB 251 RES Hearing Request 4.2.2024.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 251 |
HB 195 Sponsor Statement v B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
CSHB 195B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
HB0195B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
HB 195 Summary of Changes from v. A to B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
HB 195 Sectional Analysis v. B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
CSHB 195 Sponsor Presentation.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |
HB 329 Sponsor Statement v.D.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 329 |
CSHB 329B.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 329 |
HB 329 - Sectional Analysis v.D.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 329 |
HB 195 Supporting Document - CFEC Optimum Numbers Study.pdf |
HRES 4/8/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 195 |