Legislature(2001 - 2002)
05/12/2002 09:06 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 317(FIN)
"An Act relating to stalking and to violating a protective
order; and amending Rules 4 and 65, Alaska Rules of Civil
Procedure, and Rule 9, Alaska Rules of Administration."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRY CRAWFORD, sponsor, testified this bill closes
a loophole in Alaska law to allow unacquainted victims of a stalker
to receive the same security of a judicial protective order that
victims who have had a prior relationship with a stalker receive.
AT EASE 9:11 PM / 9:13 PM
Representative Crawford noted an anti-stalking law exists in the
domestic violence statues, but only applies to those offenders with
a prior relationship with the victim, such as husbands, ex-
boyfriends, etc., and does not apply to offenders who are strangers
to their victim. He emphasized if a stranger stalks a victim, the
anti-stalking law currently does not offer protection against the
offender.
Senator Green recalled discussions several years prior relating to
other domestic violence legislation in which a concern was raised
about a presumption of guilt. She noted the anti-stalking laws do
not contain a method for the accused to defend him or herself
against the allegations before a judicial order is issued. She
asked if this legislation contains provisions allowing the accused
proper notice and legal representation before such an order is
imposed.
Representative Crawford began to describe the three types of
protective orders currently available, including emergency
protective orders, which a police officer is able to issue.
DAVE D'AMATO, staff to Representative Crawford, testified that this
legislation has been under consideration for six to seven years in
part to address such issues as the concern Senator Green raised. He
informed that the attorney who drafted this bill, Jerry Luckhaupt,
subscribes to the theory that, "there should be no such thing as ex
parte protective orders" because of a presumption of guilt within
the community. Mr. d'Amato explained the provisions in this bill
"balances" the presumption of guilt with the need for protective
orders by allowing a party to obtain an 72-hour emergency
protective order but would not bar the accused party from their
home or work without receipt of proper notice, in which case the
accused would have an opportunity to challenge the order.
Senator Leman shared that he had sponsored anti-stalking
legislation that passed into law during a previous legislative
session. He expressed the protection is important and that he would
vote in favor of this bill.
Senator Leman "moved to report House Bill 317 from Committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying zero and
indeterminate fiscal notes."
There was no objection and CS HB 317 (FIN) MOVED from Committee
with zero fiscal notes: #1 from the Department of Law, and #5 from
the Department of Public Safety; and indeterminate fiscal notes: #2
from the Department of Corrections, and #3 from the Department of
Administration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|