Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
03/29/2012 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB206 | |
| HB316 | |
| HB271 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 206 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 316 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 316-MILITARY FACILITY ZONES
9:43:23 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI announced that the committee would hear HB
316, which allows the Department of Military and Veterans
Affairs (DMVA) to establish "military facility zones." These are
zones of economic and industrial production that help military
bases fulfill their mission. The bill passed the House with
great bipartisan support. About 13 percent to 17 percent of
Alaska's economic activity can be attributed to military bases
around the state.
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON, sponsor of HB 316, introduced the
bill. He said that HB 316 provides a flexible tool to
municipalities to stimulate businesses in Alaska that are in
close proximity to a military facility. Military facility zones
create opportunities for significant benefit to Alaska and the
nation. This bill is inclusive of all Alaska, urban and rural
alike. These zones promote the expansion of infrastructure to
benefit both military and civilian objectives.
He reported that there are 32 military installations in Alaska
that have more than 24,000 active duty and reserve National
Guard troops serving in Alaska, with 37,000 military family
members. The annual payroll amounts to $1.5 billion. These
facilities include the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, the Navy,
Marine Corps, the Coast Guard, and their respective National
Guard and reserve components.
He continued to say that military facility zones are
successfully employed in other states, such as Virginia,
Alabama, Texas, Florida, Maryland, and Arizona. They are used as
vehicles to obtain and administer funds for business development
specifically relating to military activities that enhance the
military's mission and make military bases more efficient and
effective. Military facility zones in Alaska will clearly
demonstrate the state's continuing and substantive support for
the armed services and help defend against the negative impacts
of Alaska's regional economies and military communities should
Congress choose to implement the federal Base Realignment and
Closure Act (BRAC).
THOMAS STUDLER, staff, Representative Steve Thompson, provided
information related to HB 316 on behalf of the sponsor. He
thanked the committee for hearing the bill. He read from the
following sponsor statement:
'An act relating to military facility zones in the
state; relating to the development of housing in
military facility zones; relating to the financing of
projects in military facility zones; and providing for
an effective date.' HB 316 provides a very flexible
tool to municipalities to stimulate business in Alaska
in the close proximity of military facilities.
HB 316 gives statutory authority to the Department of
Military and Veterans' Affairs to establish 'military
facility zones' within the State of Alaska. Military
facility zones are designated areas in close proximity
to a military base (facility) where industrial or
economic development will directly enhance the base's
ability to fulfill its mission.
Military facility zones are successfully employed in
other states as vehicles to obtain and administer
funds for business development specifically relating
to military activities. Funding for such zones in
Alaska may be available from the Alaska Industrial
Development and Export Authority (AIDEA) and/or the
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC), or from
federal New Market Tax Credits. Federal, state, or
local public or private funding sources, credit, or
guarantee programs can be made available directly to
municipalities and boroughs that are working on
specifically approved projects within a military
facility zone.
Military facility zones create opportunities for
significant benefits to Alaska and the nation. They
will enhance economic activity near military
installations and thereby facilitate economic growth
and development in the state, especially where local
governments are working in close partnership with
their military counterparts. The zones promote
expansion of infrastructure to benefit both military
and civilian objectives, such as civil defense,
homeland security and emergency response. They will
enhance the nation's military capabilities by helping
bases operate more effectively and efficiently.
Finally, military facility zones in Alaska will
clearly demonstrate the state's continuing and
substantive support for the armed forces.
9:48:18 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI opened public testimony.
CRAIG CAMPBELL, President and CEO, Alaska Aerospace Corporation,
testified in support of HB 316, which provides ways for local
communities to help military stay in Alaska. He shared his
experience with military bases outside of Alaska where there are
many military-related businesses right next to bases. This is
not so in Alaska. Other states try to BRAC-proof their bases by
creating partnerships with businesses. They make an effort to
offset military costs and entice businesses to communities. He
maintained that this effort should be made in Alaska in order to
support the military. Alaska Aerospace supports this effort due
to their involvement with missile activity. He said the bill
would make building a launch complex economically feasible to do
in Kodiak.
9:53:09 AM
MCHUGH PIERRE, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Military &
Veterans Affairs, testified in support of HB 316. He stated
support for local communities as they bring forward the military
facility zone designation.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the bill has an impact on Alaska
Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC}.
ERIN HAVELOCK, Multi-Family Underwriter Supervisor, Alaska
Housing Finance Corporation, answered questions related to HB
316. He stated that the statutory authority to finance loans
would not be affected; AHFC would simply be notified of the
application for the military facility zone.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked about federal new market tax credits.
MR. HAVELOCK replied that the new market tax program targets
commercial businesses, not private home financing.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if the new market tax credits require the
creation of a military facility zone.
MR. HAVELOCK thought that was a question better directed to
Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority (AIDEA), which
handles commercial loans.
9:56:48 AM
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI noted wording in the bill that includes AHFC.
MR. HAVELOCK responded that AHFC would be involved if an
application for residential housing was presented through a
corporation or through partnering lenders.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI inquired if low interest residential loans
would be made available in a military facility zone.
MR. HAVELOCK replied that AHFC did not envision having a
priority for a military facility zone.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI addressed the same question to the bill
sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON explained that there would be a need for
more housing if the Marine Corp Base would expand. A corporation
would make a deal with the Marine Corp and build subdivisions of
housing, enabling the corporation to receive federal tax
credits. AHFC would be involved in providing housing loans to
persons interested in buying housing.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI closed public testimony.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON said the bill was another tool in the
tool box for communities and military base commanders to use to
enhance military expansion.
CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI noted HB 316 would be set aside.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 206 Full Text.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB206-DNR-MLW-03-23-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - What We Do.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 - Memo of Understanding.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Background.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 Support Document-AMA Letter.PDF |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Member States.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| SB 206 IMCC Back-Up - Welcome.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/10/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 206 |
| 1- HB0316 ver I- Bill.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| 2- HB 316 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| QA on HB316 memo.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-Fiscal Note-DMVA-MVA-CO-02-13-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DOR-AHFC-02-10-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DCCED-AIDEA-02-10-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316-DCCED-AIDEA-02-28-12.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| 7- HB 316- Rep Saddler Testimony.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB0316A.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| HB316 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 316 |
| CSHB 271 (TRA).pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB 271 Fiscal.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB 271(TRA) H. Floor amend 1.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB0271-1-2-022212-ADM-N.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| CSHB271 Support Renovators.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 Ak Truck support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Fed Standard CMV.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 NFIB Support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 Norcom Operations.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Norcom.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| Hb 271 St. John support.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 Vehicle classes.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HHB 271 Support enstar.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB271 AGC Letter.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB0271A.PDF |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB 271 SPONSOR.pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |
| HB271-DOA-DMV-2-17-12 (3).pdf |
SSTA 3/29/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 4/11/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 271 |