Legislature(2011 - 2012)BARNES 124
02/17/2012 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB266 | |
| HB314 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 266 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 314 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 314-ALASKA RAILROAD LAND LEASES
4:26:16 PM
CHAIR OLSON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 314, "An Act extending the time period for which
the Alaska Railroad Corporation may lease land without reserving
the right to terminate the lease; and providing for an effective
date."
4:26:29 PM
ANNA LATHAM, Staff, Representative Kurt Olson, on behalf of the
sponsor, the House Labor and Commerce Committee, introduced
herself.
MS. LATHAM stated that HB 314 would extend the maximum Alaska
Railroad Corporation (ARRC) property lease term from 55 to 95
years. She provided a brief overview of the ARC, such that the
state has owned the Alaska railroad since 1985. It has been
incorporated and operates as though it is a private business.
The corporation generates revenues through real-estate holdings,
year-round passenger service and freight service. Historically,
railroads have owned large parcels of land which they lease to
generate revenue. The railroad industry has been cyclical so
revenue generated from property leases have helped to carry
railroads through economic downturns.
MS. LATHAM related that the ARRC leases approximately 2,000 of
the 36,000 acres it owns and the corporation currently holds 260
long-term leases. She reported that 38 percent of the 36,000
acres is devoted to right-of-way, 12 percent is used for
operations, and the remaining 50 percent is available for lease.
As a state-owned entity, the ARRC is mandated to foster economic
development statewide and in communities along the Railbelt. An
extension of lease terms for up to 95 years would assist the
ARRC in meeting this directive. She explained that longer
leases encourage high-value building construction by assuring
developers and financiers the developments will retain their
value for future buyers. Quality developments retain their
value for a longer period of time and have a higher resale
value, which is good for the railroad, the state, and for
leaseholders.
MS. LATHAM cautioned that this does not mean the standard lease
will be 95 years, but the bill will give the ARRC Board of
Directors the option of extending a lease for up to 95 years at
their discretion. She highlighted that this bill has received
widespread support and members' packets contain letters of
support from the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA), the cities of
Valdez, Seward and Whittier, and from various leaseholders and
developers throughout the Railbelt. She noted that the sponsor
has not received any opposition to this bill.
4:29:06 PM
JON COOK, Chair, Real Estate Committee; Member, Board of
Directors (BOD), Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC), stated that
the genesis of the bill was explained by Ms. Latham. He said
that this bill was requested by existing tenants and potential
developers who indicated they would be interested in developing
projects on ARRC leased property if the 95-year lease term was
available. He explained that the 95-year leases would give the
tenants an opportunity to remarket the properties to ensure that
the owners the long-term leases are as close to fee simple as
one can get. He advised that another reason to extend the lease
terms is that the underwriting standards for obtaining loans has
tightened up pretty dramatically since 2008. Therefore, 55
years for very large project is insufficient. He suggested if
HB 314 passes the 95-year leases would not be the norm, but
would be an exception reserved for new, large development, or
existing businesses that plan to invest substantial amount of
capital in the property.
4:31:14 PM
CHAIR OLSON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 314.
4:31:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES moved to report HB 314 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, HB 314 was reported from the
House Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB314 Supporting Documents-Assorted Letters.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| HB314 Supporting Documents-Assorted Letters (2).pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| HB314 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| HB314 Fiscal Note-DNR-MLW-2-10-12.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| HB314 Fiscal Note-DCCED-ARRC-02-10-12.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| HB266 Oppposing Documents-Letter Robin Cooke 2-6-12.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 266 |
| HB266 Supporting Documents-Assorted Letters and Emails for Feb 17 meeting.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 266 |
| HB314 ver A.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| HB266 Supporting Documents-Copy of email from Dave Evans with NCMIC.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 266 |