Legislature(1997 - 1998)
05/05/1998 09:23 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL 313
"An Act relating to preventive maintenance programs
required for certain state grants; and providing for
an effective date."
SENATOR GARY WILKEN informed the committee that he had
served on the preventative maintenance task force during
the summer and fall before the legislative session. The
task force had traveled around the state and listened to
people; it became evident that there was an opportunity
provided by technology and collected knowledge that could
allow preventative maintenance to be put in place for a
minimal amount of money. He argued that the preventative
maintenance programs were important and were lacking in
many different areas. He noted that HB 313 would require
that school districts, Regional Education Attendance Areas
(REAAs), and municipalities would have preventative
maintenance programs in place before being given money
through state grants.
Senator Parnell asked why there was a delayed effective
date.
DANNY DEWITT, DIRECTOR, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT
BUSINESSES, ALASKA CHAPTER, replied that there had been
discussions (primarily with the Department of Education);
there was a concern that the short time-frame between the
present time and July 1, 1998 would not be enough time for
a number of entities to get a preventative maintenance
program in place. The House State Affairs Committee had
elected to delay one year so that entities could have
enough time to proceed without too much disruption.
Senator Torgerson summarized that the bill would require
that funds be withheld until a preventative maintenance
plan was in place that included a computerized maintenance
management program. He agreed with the idea. He questioned
the impact to municipalities and REAAs in terms of
financial output. Senator Wilken responded that many had
had the same question until Roger Patch gave a presentation
in Anchorage. Mr. Patch described what he had done in the
Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, and had
suggested that a municipality or agency could put a
qualifying preventative maintenance system in place for
$10,000, given current technology. He did not think the
process would be a burden.
Mr. DeWitt directed attention to a written description of a
program to track maintenance. He encouraged the use of a
computerized system with built-in reminders of what needed
to be done and when. He referred to different levels of
systems that could give most agencies an easy opportunity
to comply with the law.
Senator Torgerson was concerned about smaller REAAs, since
the smallest had only 21 people. He noted that the fiscal
note included a request for an assistant architect to
evaluate and conduct the systems. He questioned why the
department did not just track maintenance on a centralized
and consolidated basis for smaller REAAs. Mr. DeWitt
thought the option would be available for smaller
districts, but the district would have to have the plan.
There was not a requirement to create a new department in
any given operation.
Senator Torgerson MOVED to REPORT CSHB 313(FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal notes. There being no OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB 313(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and attached fiscal and zero fiscal
notes by the Department of Education.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|