Legislature(1993 - 1994)
02/17/1994 01:30 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 313
"An Act relating to suspended imposition of criminal
sentences and to the period in which suspension of the
imposition of sentence for conviction of the crime of
disorderly conduct may be authorized."
GEORGE DOZIER, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE PETE KOTT summarized
CSHB 313 (JUD). He noted that the legislation amends AS
12.55.085(a). This section grants authority to the court to
bestow a suspended imposition of sentence in criminal cases.
He noted that aN individual found guilty of violating a
criminal conviction could be put on probation under a
suspended imposition of sentence. If the individual
complies with all the terms and conditions of their
probation, sentence is not imposed and the underlying
judgement is vacated. He explained that the suspended
imposition of sentence (SIS) is generally employed for
offenses that are not of a serious or grave nature. He
observed that SIS's commonly involve youthful offenders.
The SIS is limited to the length of time that the person
could receive as jail time for the crime, under current law.
He noted that some class B misdemeanors are limited to 10 -
90 days of jail time. He maintained that the 10 - 90 days
is not sufficient for the offender to be observed during
suspended imposition of sentence. The legislation would
allow the SIS to be equal to the amount of time a person
could be sentenced to jail or up to one year, whichever is
the greater amount. He noted that only class B misdemeanors
would be effected.
Representative Navarre asked if there would be a fiscal
impact if the probation is increased. Mr. Dozier explained
that the probation does not include active monitoring of the
offender. At the end of the probation period the offender's
file is consulted and if no petitions for revocations have
been filed the judgement is vacated.
In response to a question by Co-Chair MacLean, Mr. Dozier
explained that if an offender commits a violation while on
SIS the court has the ability to revoke probation and impose
the original sentence.
Ms. Knuth observed that the Department of Law, Department of
Corrections and Alaska Court System all support the
legislation. She maintained that CSHB 313 (JUD) allows
courts to use SIS in more cases. She noted that the court
4
is not entering SIS's in cases currently due to the short
period of probation. She anticipated that more SIS's will
be issued if the legislation is passed. She emphasized that
the records of offenders will be vacated if they have
complied with the conditions of their probation. She
expounded that the court has requested that SIS's be
expanded to a one year period.
In response to a question by Representative Martin, Ms.
Knuth clarified that Alaska statute addresses which cases
can be granted a SIS. She noted that SIS's cannot be issued
for sexual offenses.
Co-Chair MacLean MOVED to report CSHB 313 (JUD) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSHB 313 (JUD) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with six zero fiscal notes
published 2/9/94, two by the Department of Administration,
one by the Department of Law, one by the Department of
Public Safety, one by the Department of Corrections, and one
by the Alaska Court System.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|