Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/10/2010 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB246 | |
| HB307 | |
| SB194 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 307 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 194 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 246 | ||
HB 307-SEXUAL ASSAULT PROTECTIVE ORDERS
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of HB 307.
1:41:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LINDSEY HOLMES, Alaska State Legislature, sponsor
of HB 307, asked her staff to introduce the bill.
BILL EDWARDS, Staff to Representative Holmes, said HB 307
repairs the statutes pertaining to protective orders in cases of
sexual assault. Prior to 2001 protective orders existed only in
cases of domestic violence. In 2001 they were extended to cases
of stalking outside a domestic relationship and in 2006 they
were further extended to cases of sexual assault outside a
domestic relationship. However, in an oversight in the 2006 law
magistrates and district court judges were not given
jurisdiction to issue the protective orders. As a result a
number of magistrates and district court judges are declining to
issue protective orders, specifically in cases of sexual
assault. They point out that the current statute gives
jurisdiction to do so only in cases of domestic violence and
stalking.
HB 307 would amend AS 22.15.100 to give magistrates and district
court judges jurisdiction to issue protective orders in cases of
sexual assault in addition to stalking. This has been
particularly problematic in rural communities. He noted that the
sponsor of the 2006 legislation indicated that his intention had
been to include magistrate jurisdiction for cases of sexual
assault. The Alaska Network on Domestic Violence and Sexual
Assault and the Alaska Peace Officers Association support the
legislation.
1:43:58 PM
CHAIR FRENCH asked to which statute sexual assault was added in
the 2006 legislation.
MR. EDWARDS replied the sexual assault statute, AS 18.65.850
through .870, was created in 2001 for stalking. The 2006 Act
extended the stalking statute to cases of sexual assault.
CHAIR FRENCH summarized that in 2006 sexual assault was added to
the list of domestic violence protective orders, but the
legislation didn't give a judge the authority to issue the
protective order.
MR. EDWARDS agreed. A literal reading of the statutes shows that
to be correct; they don't have jurisdiction.
1:44:54 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE joined the meeting.
CHAIR FRENCH observed that a victim of a sexual assault can now
get a no-contact order from the judge handling the criminal
case, but not every case goes to criminal court.
MR. EDWARDS said that's right. The remedy for victims in cases
of sexual assault without an accompanying criminal case is to
get a protective order for sexual assault. That was the reason
for creating the 2006 statute.
CHAIR FRENCH said he wonders what the system response should be
in cases where a victim asks for a sex assault protective order
when there has been no criminal charge filed.
Finding no further questions and no testimony, Chair French
closed public testimony.
1:48:02 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE asked if the sponsor reviewed the statutes to be
reasonable sure that sexual assault is the only category that
should be added to protective orders.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES replied there are other areas that the
court may want to give magistrates jurisdiction, but they are
not related to protective orders.
SENATOR MCGUIRE said at the time she didn't understand why the
stalking statute didn't include strangers. Now she wonders if
magistrates should be allowed to issue protective orders in
other cases.
MR. EDWARDS replied it may be the case that in other
circumstances judges should be empowered to issue protective
orders and not wait until there's been victimization.
SENATOR MCGUIRE said it would be interesting to talk with
magistrates to find out if there are other circumstances where
they would like to have that tool.
1:51:29 PM
CHAIR FRENCH pointed out that there is some legitimate pushback
to protective orders. Most of the time they are used
appropriately, but every now and again they're used otherwise.
CHAIR FRENCH held HB 307 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSSB 194 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/10/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| Excerpt from SOA Plan to Reduce & Prevent Underage Drinking Oct 2009.pdf |
SJUD 2/10/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| Legal Memo 10.20.2009.pdf |
SJUD 2/10/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |
| Letter of Support Anchorage CHARR.pdf |
SJUD 2/10/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 194 |