Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/04/2006 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB307 | |
| HB29 | |
| HB446 | |
| HB326 | |
| HB57 | |
| HB419 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| = | HB 307 | ||
| + | HB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 446 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 326 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 419 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 307(RES)
"An Act creating the Knik River Public Use Area."
This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Green announced that a Senate Finance Committee Letter
of Intent was developed to address concerns raised by members
during the bill's first hearing.
Co-Chair Green moved to adopt the Committee Letter of Intent
(LOI) and read it into the record as follows.
Letter of Intent
Senate Finance Committee
CS HB 307(RES)
It is the intent of the 24th Alaska State Legislature that
the Department of Natural Resources evaluate instituting
user fees to pay the long term costs for management and
necessary facilities associated with the public use of the
Knik Public Use Area established under House Bill 307. The
department should consider such fees as a component of the
Management Plan that will be prepared under AS 41.23.190.
Senator Stedman spoke in opposition to the establishment of a
user fee program and, therefore, objected to adopting the LOI.
9:07:07 AM
Co-Chair Wilken pointed out that the inclusion of the word
"evaluate" was key to his support of the LOI, as it would
require the Department to develop a plan, which would then be
presented to the Legislature for "some sort" of approval.
Co-Chair Green characterized the Knik Public Use Area (KPUA) as
an "unwieldy area" in which to institute a user fee program, as,
rather than being a park at which money could be collected at
the gate, this is "an open area" with many entry points. An
appropriate user fee program must be developed. Options could
include the purchase of a bumper sticker, card, or certificate.
While a user fee program "would not be an easy thing to
implement", it is worthy of discussion.
9:08:27 AM
Senator Dyson, while appreciating the intent of the LOI, asked
the sponsor's opinion of it.
9:08:35 AM
BEN MULLIGAN, Staff to Representative Bill Stoltze, the bill's
sponsor, noted that Representative Stoltze was comfortable with
the language since it specified that the implementation of a
user fee would be "evaluated". This language would allow any
proposed fee structure to be reviewed by the Legislature.
Senator Bunde noted that numerous user fee programs have been
successfully implemented in the State. For example, the
Anchorage Ski Club sells a pin to generate money to maintain
their trails. While the purchase of the pin is voluntary,
pressure is exerted on users to purchase one. The State has a
snowmobile registration fee that generates money for snowmachine
trail maintenance.
Senator Bunde pointed out that this legislation would not have
been introduced had users of the KPUA area been more
responsible. Implementation of a user fee program would
accomplish two things: people who paid the fee "would be less
tolerant of the scofflaws" and the funds it generated would help
"care for the area".
9:10:29 AM
Senator Stedman was disinterested in establishing a user fee
precedence for areas beyond the KPUA. The prospect of requiring
people to pay user fees or to place identifying stickers on
their boats or recreational vehicles to recreate, hunt, or fish
on State or federal lands, such as the United States Forest
Service managed land in Southeast Alaska, was unappealing. He
was "adamantly opposed" to the language in the LOI. It could
diminish the bill's ability to be adopted by the Legislature.
9:11:16 AM
Senator Bunde pointed out that recreation in the State is
already being paid for, as such things as small boat
registration fees already exist. In order to support recreation
programs, the State must either implement user fees or utilize
the State's general funds.
Co-Chair Green asked whether Senator Bunde could suggest any
alternate funding source.
Senator Bunde could not.
9:11:48 AM
Senator Dyson noted that, for a long time, hunters and fisherman
have willingly purchased fishing and hunting licenses, as the
proceeds from those licenses are used to fund research and
resource management activities. He did not believe that
implementing a fee structure in the KPUA would set a
recreational use fee precedent because the purpose of the fee
would be to limit damage being done in the area and to pay for
the cost of policing it. He agreed with Co-Chair Green that the
area was difficult to work with. The proposal could either be
considered "brilliant" or at a minimum "a well thought out first
step" towards a solution.
Co-Chair Green added that the difficulty in addressing the
concerns about the area is compounded by the fact that it is "in
such close proximity to where people live". The "great deal of
interest" in how the area should be managed has increased the
conflicts.
Senator Stedman maintained his objection to adopting the LOI.
9:13:31 AM
Senator Olson, who was unfamiliar with the area, asked whether
implementing a user fee would assist in deterring "nuisance
behavior", specifically "the discharging of firearms in an
unwise manner".
Co-Chair Green responded that the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) might hire "caretakers" to police the area for
illegal activities, particularly during evening and weekend
hours when the use of the area is the heaviest. Additional
funding might be required in the future to support policing
efforts. While the State's general fund is not typically used to
fund this type of activity, this might be "an exception because
it is such a unique" and heavily used area. While the majority
of people using the area are respectful and law-abiding, five to
ten percent of the users are scofflaws. Peer pressure might have
some affect were the implementation of a user fee to fail to
alter deviant behavior.
A roll call was taken on the motion to adopt the LOI.
IN FAVOR: Senator Bunde, Senator Dyson, Senator Hoffman, Co-
Chair Wilken and Co-Chair Green
OPPOSED: Senator Stedman and Senator Olson
The motion PASSED (5-2)
The Letter of Intent was ADOPTED.
Senator Dyson moved to report the bill and the Senate Finance
Committee Letter of Intent from Committee with individual
recommendations and accompanying fiscal note.
Without objection, CS HB 307(RES) and the Senate Finance
Committee Letter of Intent were REPORTED from Committee with a
new $356,800 fiscal note dated May 3, 2006 from the Department
of Natural Resources.
AT EASE 9:16:18 AM / 9:16:38 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|