Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
03/10/2020 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB233 | |
| HB264 | |
| HB250 | |
| HB307 | |
| HB285 | |
| HB228 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 233 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 264 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 250 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 307 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 285 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 228 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 307-EXPANDING PRISONER ACCESS TO COMPUTERS
3:27:54 PM
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the next order of
business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 307, "An Act relating to living
conditions for prisoners."
3:28:16 PM
REID HARRIS, Staff, Representative Kreiss-Tomkins, Alaska State
Legislature, paraphrased from the sponsor statement, which read:
HB 307 bill amends AS 33.30.015(a) relating to living
conditions for prisoners by removing the restriction
prohibiting a prisoner from possessing a computer in
the prisoner's cell, and expanding the approved
purposes for which a prisoner may use a computer to
include facilitation of rehabilitation and
reintegration, access to legal reference materials,
visitation, or as part of a reentry plan.
3:29:12 PM
JENNIFER WINKELMAN, Acting Deputy Commissioner, Department of
Corrections (DOC), relayed that the department supports HB 307 -
the use of computers by inmates for reentry and rehabilitative
purposes. She pointed out the zero-fiscal note (FN) and stated
that under HB 307, the prohibition on inmate access to computers
would be lifted; once the restriction was lifted, the department
would consider the technologies and opportunities that exist.
3:30:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked about department oversight regarding
the inmate use of computers.
MS. WINKELMAN answered that oversight would be addressed in the
next phase. She said that the phase of lifting the restrictions
would be first; examining the policies for oversight and
determining the details of implementation would be in a second
phase.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE offered that "reintegration into society"
is vague. She maintained that the general public would support
efforts to assist inmates with education and reintegration; and
she acknowledged the importance of accessing services. She
stated, however, that the phrase "reintegration into society" is
too vague; the parameters of what an inmate may access is not
well defined; and an inmate could legally demand access to
social media and video games.
MS. WINKELMAN responded that to date, the focus has been on
General Education Development (GED) testing, [access to]
Medicaid [a government health care insurance program], and "for
the system to be able to create some sort of efficiency for
other departments." She stated that she acknowledged the
concerns and would welcome an amendment.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS commented that although the language is
permissive, in no way would an inmate have the legal right to
demand access to video games.
MS. WINKELMAN concurred, and reiterated that the department has
not had discussions on policies to address the concerns brought
forward by Representative Vance.
3:33:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY commented that school districts have
information technology (IT) security measures; they dictate the
sites that may or may not be accessed; the schools can monitor
what students are accessing. She offered that DOC IT could also
provide that security.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON asked whether DOC would provide the
computers for computer access.
MS. WINKELMAN answered no.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS expressed his understanding that
currently there is electronic device access by inmates and asked
what devices they access and who provides the devices.
MS. WINKELMAN replied that currently in facility education
departments with computers, the computers are older and without
internet access. In certain institutions, an inmate can
purchase a video game machine; however, any of the computers
provided to the inmates are "locked down" in the education
department and overseen by correctional officers (COs) or
education coordinators.
3:36:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked for a clear statement of the goal for
lifting the prohibition and exactly what opportunities exist for
reintegration into society under HB 307.
3:37:26 PM
KELLY HOWELL, Special Assistant to the Commissioner, Department
of Corrections (DOC), answered that the department considered
knowledge and awareness of the use of technology as one of the
aspects facilitating successful reintegration; once inmates are
released, they would have a familiarity with filling out an
online application for employment or health benefits.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS summarized that the intent of the
proposed legislation is clear philosophically and as such, has
the support of the committee; however, more specificity is
needed on implementation mechanically and programmatically.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked whether the use of computers for
reentry would occur within the education department, or whether
there are other areas in the prison where that would occur.
MS. WINKELMAN answered that often the education department area
is where reentry courses are held; however, many times
volunteers from community and the reentry coalitions and the
field and institutional probation officers (POs) work with
inmates to prepare them for release. Not just the education
coordinators or teachers in the facility help with the reentry
program.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS stated that HB 307 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 233 Letter of Support 3.9.20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 233 |
| HB 233 Letter of Support #2 3.9.20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 233 |
| HB 233 Letter of Support #3 3.9.20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 233 |
| HB 307 Sponsor Statement v. A 3.9.2020.pdf |
HJUD 3/23/2020 1:00:00 PM HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 307 Sectional Analysis v. A 3.9.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 307 v. A 3.9.2020.PDF |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 307 Fiscal Note DOC-IDO-03-06-20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 285 Sponsor Statement ver A 3.10.20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 285 |
| HB 285 Sectional ver A 3.10.20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 285 |
| HB 285 ver A 3.10.20.PDF |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 285 |
| HB 285 Fiscal Note DNR-DMLW-3-6-20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 285 |
| HB 228 Transmittal Letter 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 Sectional Analysis 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 Fiscal Note DOA OPA 1.27.2020.PDF |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 Fiscal Note DMVA Offc Commissioner 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 v. A 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 Fiscal Note DOA PDA 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 Fiscal Note DOC Health and Rehab 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 Fiscal Note DPS Statewide Support 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 228 Fiscal Note Law Crim. Div. 1.27.2020.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 228 |
| HB 233 Letter of Support - Testimony 3.9.20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 233 |
| HB 233 Letter of Support - Testimony #2 3.9.20.pdf |
HSTA 3/10/2020 3:00:00 PM |
HB 233 |