Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 120
01/27/2010 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB298 | |
| HB307 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 298 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 307 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 307 - SEXUAL ASSAULT PROTECTIVE ORDERS
2:41:13 PM
CHAIR RAMRAS [announced that the final order of business would
be] HOUSE BILL NO. 307, "An Act relating to sexual assault
protective orders."
2:41:34 PM
BILL EDWARDS, Staff, Representative Lindsey Holmes, Alaska State
Legislature, explained on behalf of the sponsor, Representative
Holmes, that HB 307 repairs a gap in magistrate and district
court judge jurisdiction with regard to issuing protective
orders in cases of sexual assault. Currently there are three
types of protective orders - those pertaining to domestic
violence (DV), those pertaining to sexual assault, and those
pertaining to stalking. Prior to 2001, protective orders were
issued only in cases of DV, but House Bill 1 in 2001 extended
this protection to cases involving stalking outside of a
domestic relationship, and Senate Bill 54 in 2006 further
extended this protection to cases involving sexual assault
outside of a domestic relationship.
MR. EDWARDS explained that the current problem is that the
statute giving magistrates and district court judges the
authority to issue protective orders was not amended to
specifically state that a protective order could be issued for
cases involving sexual assault, as was intended with the
aforementioned Senate Bill 54. As a result, magistrates and
district court judges in some parts of the state, particularly
rural parts of the state, have been saying, quite correctly,
that they don't have the authority to issue protective orders in
cases involving sexual assault. This means that victims of
these crimes have to go to a superior court judge, and this is
particularly burdensome on victims who live in communities that
are far away from a superior court. House Bill 307 remedies
this by amending AS 22.15.100(9)(B) such that magistrates and
district court judges would have the authority to issue a
protective order in cases involving sexual assault.
MR. EDWARDS, in conclusion, noted that members' packets contain
minutes pertaining to the aforementioned Senate Bill 54; e-mail
correspondence between himself and that bill's sponsor
confirming that the intent of that bill was for magistrates and
district court judges to issue protective orders in cases
involving sexual assault; and a letter of support for HB 307
from the Alaska Network on Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault
(ANDVSA).
2:44:15 PM
PEGGY BROWN, Executive Director, Alaska Network on Domestic
Violence & Sexual Assault (ANDVSA), said the ANDVSA supports
HB 307, and had noticed the aforementioned oversight that's
resulted in some magistrates and district court judges,
particularly in rural areas of Alaska, [refusing to issue
protective orders in cases involving sexual assault]. Closing
such loopholes might seem inconsequential, but doing so has a
huge impact out in the field, and provides the tools with which
perpetrators can be brought to justice and victims can be
protected.
CHAIR RAMRAS, after ascertaining that no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 307.
2:45:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM moved to report HB 307 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, HB 307 was reported from the
House Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 2 HB298 Sectional.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/1/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 3 HB298 version A.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/1/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 4 HB298 CTS Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/1/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 1 HB298 HJUD Hearing Request.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/1/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 5 HB298 DOC Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/1/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 6 HB298 PDA Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/1/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 7 HB298 LAW Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/1/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 8 HB298-DPS Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 1/25/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 298 |
| 0 HB307 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| 1 HB307 v A.pdf |
HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| 2 HB307 Sectional.pdf |
HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| 3 HB307 Support.pdf |
HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| 4 HB307-LAW-CRIM-01-25-10.pdf |
HJUD 1/27/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 307 |