Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
02/28/2022 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB323 | |
| HB307 | |
| HB306 | |
| HB58 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 323 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 307 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 306 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 58 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 306-EXTEND BOARD OF PHARMACY
3:24:31 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 306, "An Act extending the termination
date of the Board of Pharmacy; and providing for an effective
date."
3:25:19 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 3:25 p.m. to 3:26 p.m.
3:26:25 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ invited the bill sponsor to provide comment.
3:26:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDI STORY, Alaska State Legislature, as the
prime sponsor of HB 306, provided closing comments on the bill.
She said the Board of Pharmacy is important to Alaska and
Alaskans and urged that the board be extended.
3:28:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER inquired about the Board of Pharmacy's
position regarding the participation of veterinarians in the
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP).
3:28:43 PM
JUSTIN RUFFRIDGE, Chair, Board of Pharmacy, replied that at its
last meeting the Board of Pharmacy voted to support the bill
that was currently in front of the legislature to exempt
veterinarians from the PDMP [SB 132, HB 91]. He explained that
some potential updates are needed in the PDMP for it to work in
a more efficient and cohesive manner. In the meantime, he
continued, since the veterinarians are not participating in the
current rendition of the PDMP until some changes are made, it
seemed that the Board of Pharmacy was in support of that
exemption until such time as those changes were put in place.
He said a letter was recently sent out in that regard.
3:29:47 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ offered her understanding that the [July
2021] sunset audit report on the Board of Pharmacy states that
veterinarians are participating at a higher rate than are many
of the other prescribers. She recalled commenting at the bill's
previous hearing about the need to potentially update the
statute to make it easier for veterinarians to use but said she
didn't mean to imply that veterinarians should not participate
in the PDMP.
MR. RUFFRIDGE responded that this has been a long time coming in
discussion at the board level. He confirmed that the data for
veterinarians shows a higher [participation] rate in the PDMP,
but said it is a smaller number of individuals. Pharmacists and
pharmacies, he stated, currently have the highest rate of usage
of the PDMP, in the high 90 percentages, but it is because the
usage for pharmacists and pharmacies is relatively straight
forward and clear reporting, with no review requirement unless
it is felt like there is a necessity to review. Regarding other
prescribers, he pointed out that there are more of them, and it
is unclear as to what the delegate usage can be, especially for
physicians, so it would be difficult to move in the direction of
needing to discipline licensees for non-review requirements.
The Board of Veterinary Examiners, he continued, found itself in
an equally tough position of having to undergo investigations
for individuals who were in many cases just providing normal
everyday care, but the zero-reporting requirement was very
burdensome and there is a small number of individuals. The
Board of Veterinary Examiners made its case relatively well at
the Board of Pharmacy's last meeting and the board agreed on the
exemption. The Board of Pharmacy has previously discussed the
need for some changes to the PDMP regarding efficiencies and the
chair of the veterinary board has said that that would be a
great time to have a seat at the table to discuss those issues.
3:32:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked whether the Board of Pharmacy has
reviewed the study published in late 2021 or early 2022
regarding a significant increase in the instance of veterinarian
shopping as it pertains to opioids. She recommended becoming
familiar with the study prior to future hearings on [the bill
that would exempt veterinarians from the PDMP].
MR. RUFFRIDGE answered that some things heard at the board level
echo those concerns, including reports received from the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA). How veterinary prescriptions
happen in the PDMP has been a difficulty, he said. For example,
some pharmacies input veterinary prescriptions under the owner's
name with the pet's name elsewhere in the record, while other
pharmacies input the animal's name and birthdate and not the
owner's name at all. The Board of Pharmacy asked the question
of whether there needs to be a clear description of how
veterinary data is input into the pharmacy software as well as
into the PDMP. The answer was yes, so the Board of Pharmacy is
currently working towards regulation language to solidify how
reporting of veterinary prescriptions happens in the PDMP.
3:35:02 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ understood Mr. Ruffridge to have stated that
work is being done to clarify what information veterinarians
must enter in the PDMP if they were to continue to comply. She
encouraged Mr. Ruffridge to read the "Journal of Veterinary
Medicine" report that shows a three-fold increase in opioid
prescription amongst veterinarians in the last five years. Peer
reviewed data, she continued, shows an increase in veterinarian
shopping and the committee is interested in simplifying the
statute, providing statutory updates to make it easy for folks
to participate, and addressing any make-work and ambiguous
elements. The opioid epidemic continues and the cost of turning
a blind eye to a small subsection of the provider community
could be costly for individual Alaskans over time and everyone
bears the cost of that. She said she and Representative Snyder
are concerned and curious about potential updates to the statute
to meet the state's public health need while making the PDMP
more user friendly and transparent for veterinarians and other
license types who are required to participate in the PDMP.
MR. RUFFRIDGE agreed with Co-Chair Spohnholz's statement and
said there is clear evidence that tweaks are needed. Overdose
deaths in Alaska have gone up, he said, and that has been with
the PDMP in place. Additional features could be integrated into
the PDMP, he continued, such as data that is already collected
regarding overdoses, so physicians and other prescribers are
aware of issues with patients that they are seeing. Work needs
to be done on the PDMP and the Board of Pharmacy would like to
participate in that conversation when it is deemed appropriate.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ stated that the committee will follow up with
Mr. Ruffridge and Ms. Chambers to set up a time to identify
potential solutions.
3:38:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked whether language should be included
in the bill about the audit issues that led to the board's
extension for only six years [rather than eight].
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ explained it is typical that the sunset audit
findings are presented alongside the sunset extension
legislation, but the legislation doesn't typically include any
reference to that. She said a shorter sunset extension implies
that there were some issues which need to be addressed.
3:39:09 PM
KRIS CURTIS, CPA, CISA, Legislative Auditor, Division of
Legislative Audit, responded that the reduction in the extension
isn't necessarily a reflection of any specific finding or
recommendation. It is to recognize the board's evolving role in
combatting the public health crisis, she said. It is also
recognizing her recommendation not to wait eight years to come
back to see how the board is adapting to the new laws, as well
as because new laws are continuing to be discussed. The
legislature may want to consider reducing or increasing the
extension, she added.
3:40:04 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ opened public testimony on HB 306.
3:40:21 PM
DUANE WOOD, testified in support of HB 306. He said he is a
pharmacy student at the University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA).
He pointed out that every state has such a board to structure,
guide, and maintain the pharmacy community, and the board
maintains the professional licenses of pharmacists, technicians,
and interns. The whole community benefits from the knowledge
that the professional licenses of pharmacists and the Board of
Pharmacy are on solid ground, he stated.
3:41:42 PM
BARRY CHRISTENSEN, RPh, Co-Chair Legislative Committee, Alaska
Pharmacists Association, testified in support of HB 306. He
stated that he is a practicing pharmacist and that the Board of
Pharmacy has always done a great job. He recounted that former
Senator Lyda Green worked with [the Alaska Pharmacists
Association] to put forward the PDMP, which has been a work in
motion. He said the Board of Pharmacy over the years has done a
great job in nurturing the PDMP and making sure it is continued.
3:42:45 PM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ closed public testimony after ascertaining
that no one else wished to testify.
3:42:53 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS moved to report HB 306 out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, HB 306 was moved out of the House
Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 307 Letter of Support 02.24.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 307 Supporting Document - Interior Energy Project January 2022 Update to Legislature 2.23.2022.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 307 ver. A 2.23.22.PDF |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 307 Fiscal Note DCCED-AIDEA 2.18.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| HB 307 Sponsor Statement 2.21.2022.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 307 |
| SB 17 v. A Supporting Document - HB 306 2010 State Energy Policy.PDF |
HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM SCRA 2/25/2021 3:30:00 PM |
HB 306 SB 17 |
| HB 306 Sponsor Statement 02.09.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 306 |
| HB 306 ver A 2.22.22.PDF |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 306 |
| HB 306 Supporting Document - Legislative Audit Division Sunset Review BOP 07.15.21.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 306 |
| HB 306 Fiscal Note DCCED-CBPL 2.18.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 306 |
| HB 306 Letters of Support as of 02.22.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 306 |
| HB 306 Sectional Analysis Ver A 02.09.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 306 |
| HB 323 Sponsor Statement 2.17.2022.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 323 |
| HB 323 ver. A 2.22.22.PDF |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 323 |
| HB 323 Fiscal Note DCCED-CBPL 2.18.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 323 |
| HB 323 Research DLA 02.17.2022.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 323 |
| HB 323 Sectional Analysis 02.17.2022.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 323 |
| HB 323 Letter of Support 2.22.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/23/2022 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 323 |
| HB 58 Letter of Opposition - AK Family Action.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| CS HB 58 (L&C), v. I.pdf |
HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Testimony received as of 2.28.22.pdf |
HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DHSS-MS 2.28.2022.pdf |
HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DCCED-DOI 2.28.2022.pdf |
HL&C 2/28/2022 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |