Legislature(2009 - 2010)BARNES 124
02/23/2010 03:00 PM House ENERGY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR45 | |
| HB296 | |
| HB303 | |
| HB31 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 303 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 296 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 45 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 303-SMALL BUSINESS ENERGY EFFICIENCY GRANTS
3:54:17 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 303, "An Act establishing the Alaska energy
efficient small business grant fund and program."
3:54:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURT OLSON, Alaska State Legislature, thanked the
committee for its work and introduced his aide.
3:55:20 PM
JENNIFER SENETTE, Staff, Representative Kurt Olson, Alaska State
Legislature, introduced HB 303 on behalf of Representative
Olson, prime sponsor. Ms. Senette referred to Alaska Housing
Finance Corporation's (AHFC) successful home energy rebate
program and said that this legislation was intended to open that
program to small businesses. HB 303 would allow small business
owners wishing to ameliorate the energy efficiency of their
buildings to receive a rebate for some of the expenditures. As
with the homeowner program, HB 303 would require an energy
efficiency rater evaluate the business structure to be
retrofitted before and after the improvements. The amount of
the rebate would be determined by the amount of energy
efficiency gained by making the improvements, and by receipts
for the completed work and materials. The bill sets three
guidelines for the businesses to meet in order to qualify for
the program. Firstly, the assessed value of the structure to be
retrofitted cannot exceed $1 million. Secondly, the structure
must be owned by a person or persons licensed by the state and
with no outstanding liabilities to the state. Thirdly, the
structure must meet criteria adopted by AHFC. Ms. Senette
anticipated questions and noted that representatives from AHFC
and the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) were available to testify.
3:58:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM observed that a small business may be
operated out of a home or garage. She surmised that type of
small business would not qualify.
MS. SENETTE suggested the bill sponsor would be willing to work
on that point.
3:59:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM stated her belief in the sponsor's
intent to include businesses, such as sub-contractors and day
care owners, who may work at home.
CO-CHAIR EDGMON asked whether a non-resident small business
owner would qualify.
3:59:50 PM
MS. SENETTE responded that there is no language in the bill that
requires residency.
CO-CHAIR EDGMON asked whether the rater concept is the same as
the residential users.
4:00:43 PM
MS. SENETTE said yes. HB 303 is intended to "mirror" the home
energy rebate program. She suggested more details could be
provided by AHFC.
4:01:06 PM
CO-CHAIR EDGMON expressed his concern about the bill because of
the limited amount of funds available for residential users of
the home energy rebate program. Since only 10 percent of the
state has participated, a vast number of homes in the state have
yet to participate. Co-Chair Edgmon understood the benefits of
helping small businesses; however, he cautioned against
diverting money and preventing residential users from getting
rebates on their homes.
4:02:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON recalled there were problems in drafting
the bill during the interim because the amount of surplus funds
was unknown, and the success of the new AHFC program was also
unknown. He surmised that there is a fair amount of surplus and
said, "But again, that's probably something that will be dealt
with by the finance committee."
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK referred to page 2, line 7, of the bill, and
asked whether a business owner who leased property for the
business would qualify.
4:04:05 PM
MS. SENETTE said the bill is intended for the owner of the
business.
4:04:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK gave an example of a business owner who
wanted to install new windows in a space he or she leased.
MS. SENETTE said she will have to get back to the committee in
this regard.
4:04:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM asked whether the sponsor objected to
the addition of a residency requirement.
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON indicated no.
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM said a residency requirement is
essential.
4:05:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN noted that many small business owners
who operate from a leased space pay for utilities and may not be
able to talk the building owner into making energy improvements.
He asked whether the sponsor knows how to help an owner in that
situation.
4:06:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON voiced the sponsors' intent to start small,
get the program up and running, and let it develop and grow.
4:07:22 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT observed that although she understood the
concern for businesses located in malls, the intent was truly
for small business.
BRYAN BUTCHER, Director, Governmental Affairs & Public
Relations, Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC), Department
of Revenue (DOR), in response to Co-Chair Edgmon, explained that
AHFC does not have a definition of a small business. He
deferred to the bill sponsor.
4:08:51 PM
CO-CHAIR EDGMON relayed his support of the concept of HB 303,
but perhaps not the mechanism. He suggested a loan program may
be better. He then asked for AHFC's position on the impact HB
303 would have on the residential homeowner energy rebate
program.
4:10:20 PM
MR. BUTCHER acknowledged that home energy rebate program funds
are fully encumbered, although funds will become available from
those who do not complete the program. Furthermore, the
weatherization funds will be spent in FY 2011. It is certain
that the passage of HB 303 will require additional funding. He
said the possibilities for a loan program may include a
revolving loan fund with energy performance contracting. In
response to an earlier question as to how the energy audits
would work for this, he explained that the AKwarm software that
is used for the ratings on the residential program is being
expanded for use on commercial buildings.
4:11:57 PM
CO-CHAIR EDGMON expressed his sense of discomfort with the bill
as it currently stands, and gave the example of a $10,000 rebate
approved for a $1 million building. He suggested that the bill
sponsor consider a separate program that the legislature would
put more money into. In that case, he would also support more
money for the current residential and weatherization programs.
Co-Chair Edgmon said further conversations about helping small
businesses, residential users, and housing authorities with
weatherization money should take place in the House Finance
Committee. He said, "I am saying that I do have a level of
discomfort with the bill as it's presently structured because I
think there are some fundamental issues that need to be
addressed somewhere along the line."
4:14:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN referred to page 2, line 4, of the bill,
and asked whether AHFC provided loans for small businesses for
new structures.
MR. BUTCHER answered that AHFC is strictly residential and does
not have relationships with small businesses. He opined this
language is probably fashioned on the home energy rebate program
in that owners can qualify for a rebate if they build a new, 5
Star Plus home.
4:15:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EDGMON asked whether the AKwarm software has to
be updated for use on businesses.
MR. BUTCHER said yes, but that is something AHFC is already
doing as part of negotiations with the Department of Energy
(DOE) and for requirements in other legislation.
CO-CHAIR EDGMON asked whether another mechanism might
incorporate this concept.
MR. BUTCHER acknowledged that this could be discussed.
4:16:37 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT relayed that the sponsor offered the bill as an
amendment to the energy omnibus bill, so that option remains
available to the committee.
4:17:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK referred to page 2, line 14, of the bill,
and asked whether a business owner with several properties would
qualify for improvements to only one property.
MR. BUTCHER imagined it would be a situation where only one
address could be used one time, although this would be discussed
as the program is set up.
[Co-Chair Millett turned the gavel over to Co-Chair Edgmon.]
4:18:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK gave several examples of business ownership.
MR. BUTCHER confirmed that AHFC would talk to the Department of
Commerce, Community, & Economic Development (DCCED) and the
Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) in this regard.
4:20:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS also called attention to page 2, line 14,
of the bill. He pointed out the difficulty in establishing the
value of a commercial building in rural areas, and unorganized
boroughs, where there is no tax assessment by a municipality.
Representative Ramras questioned AHFC's ability to establish
parity between commercial buildings in Dillingham, Ekwok,
Fairbanks, and Anchorage.
[Co-Chair Edgmon returned the gavel to Co-Chair Millett.]
4:21:38 PM
MR. BUTCHER deferred the question to AEA as AHFC does not have
this expertise.
4:22:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS re-stated his question as to the
methodology to assess the value of a building, especially in
rural areas or an unorganized borough, in order to ascertain the
dollar value and observe the guidelines and procedures referred
to in the bill.
4:22:35 PM
SARA FISHERGOAD, Deputy Director, Operations, Alaska Industrial
Development & Export Authority (AIDEA) and Alaska Energy
Authority (AEA), Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic
Development, stated she would talk to other experts for
guidance.
4:23:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS said this is a significant hurdle. He
suggested the solution of making any structure in rural Alaska
eligible for the credit. Other suggestions were to use the
population density in the community or the number of employees
as the method for determining eligibility.
4:24:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN pointed out the need for a definition of
"small business." He recalled that the federal definition of
small business is one with 100 employees or less; however, in
most of Alaska, a business with 99 employees is not considered
small. This definition may vary in different areas of the
country.
4:25:56 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT noted several questions on the bill. She said
she and Co-Chair Edgmon intend to hold the bill but continue the
discussion.
4:26:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON informed the committee that one of the
concepts was to establish value on a square footage basis, which
would get around the regional issue.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK also supported the square footage concept.
4:27:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS assured members he is a small businessman,
even though he has 250 employees, when compared to the giants
that he is competing against. For example, Silver Bay Seafoods
in Sitka moves 31 million pounds of seafood, but is small when
compared to Ocean Beauty and Trident Seafood. He urged that
the numeric values of employees should not be used to determine
what is a small business.
4:29:23 PM
CO-CHAIR EDGMON observed that the intertie between energy and
economics is very real. He expressed his support of efforts by
the legislature to help small businesses, such as commercial
fishermen, through loan programs or in other ways.
4:30:15 PM
CO-CHAIR MILLETT announced that HB 303 was held pending
forthcoming amendments.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 31 sectional summary.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HB0031A.pdf |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HB 31 Amendment Sectional Summary.PDF |
HENE 2/16/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HB 31 sponsor statement.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HB 31 net metering map.PDF |
HENE 3/24/2009 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HB 31 NHA Waterpower.PDF |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 31 |
| HB 296 SEP bonds Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HENE 2/9/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
| HB0296-1-1-011910-REV-N.pdf |
HENE 2/9/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
| HB0296-2-1-011910-DOT-N.pdf |
HENE 2/9/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
| HB 296 Amendment 1.PDF |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
| AM#2 HB296.pdf |
HENE 2/9/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
| HB0296A.pdf |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 296 |
| HB 303 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
HENE 2/16/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 303 |
| HB 303 Sectional Summary.PDF |
HENE 2/16/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 303 |
| HB303-REV-AHFC-2-14-10 AFHC Small Business Energy Loans.pdf |
HENE 2/16/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 303 |
| HB0303A.pdf |
HENE 2/16/2010 3:00:00 PM HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 303 |
| HJR045A.pdf |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
|
| Gov Cap and Trade.pdf |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
|
| Energy Committee Agenda 02232010.pdf |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 303 NFIB Support.pdf |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 303 |
| HB 303 Amendment 1 Petersen.PDF |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |
HB 303 |
| HJR 45 fiscal note.pdf |
HENE 2/23/2010 3:00:00 PM |